If it's true that City won't be able to afford Kane if the Grealish deal goes through, I'm hoping that they'll sign Grealish. As great as he is, he after all brings the sort of things they already possess in relative abundance, and he's not that much better than whoever he'll keep out of their lineup. Kane, on the other hand, would definitely bring dimensions they don't currently have, and could be transformational.
Transfer Tweets - 2021/22 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting
- Thread starter Damien
- Start date
- Status
If it's true that City won't be able to afford Kane if the Grealish deal goes through, I'm hoping that they'll sign Grealish. As great as he is, he after all brings the sort of things they already possess in relative abundance, and he's not that much better than whoever he'll keep out of their lineup. Kane, on the other hand, would definitely bring dimensions they don't currently have, and could be transformational.
Luckily we just got the only other player in that bracket (at least in terms of talent)
Luckily we just got the only other player in that bracket (at least in terms of talent)
Sancho wonderful post.
Seems Grealish has basically said if you can agree a fee I’ll leave - if not I’ll sign a new deal - and left it up to the clubs.
That's a steal.
Is he any good? From the video I saw he reminded me a lot of Rojo... a bit rash and looked like a red card in the waiting. Was hoping we'd go for any of the other names we we're linked with... which we luckily did
If they do our players will have to be at the very top of their game all season long if they want to topple City, I mean you might be looking at 98 points or more to be above City this season.
TBH if City are allowed to buy both Grealish and Kane in this same window I don't think any of us can really expect us to go on and win the league this coming season.
Regardless of a transfer to City, why would Grealish renew at Villa? It doesn’t make any sense for him
Villa fan, loves the club, more money (Villa’s owner is loaded), and a club on the rise. Not the worst decision.
He gets a big pay rise
This is small ambition if true - in this case he wouldn’t fit at a big club anyway.
He would get significantly more in a big club further down the road, as well as chances to actually win something
No, they've 'not spent' £45m from Sane, have made £50m from selling Harrison, Angelino, Nmecha & the % profit on the Sancho deal - then expect to get £47m from selling Ilic, Herrera, Porro & Morgan Rogers (feck knows how) + loan fees on top of that.
Last edited:
Their PR team working overtime again.
Paupers, I don't know how they manage
That’s such a terrible argument.
It’s simply an opinion. Of course other people may think differently
Bigger team, who I would like to go to, refused to pay the money required to buy me from my (incredibly rich) club. I love my club, I was a boyhood fan and I am still contracted to them for 4 years but my club now want to increase my weekly wage.
No. I couldn't possibly sign a new deal to set me up for life incase I get injured or any other unforseen circumstances as someone on the internet thinks it shows a lack of ambition
Not shocked. He’s a PL player all over
Plus sales not purely loan
Pay bump until someone else comes in for him next season. Question is, will Villa pull a Levy and demand an even higher fee next season?
More money. Probably inserts a release clause if there isn't one already.
"I want to leave in the correct way"
Continues leaving in the incorrect way
Continues leaving in the incorrect way
Apart from Sane and Angelino, never heard of the others.
They buy and sell a pile of players you've never heard of every season. Usually for decent fees. Just City being City.
- Status