And if AWB got injured, who would've replaced him?
Probably one of Fosu-Mensah (before January), Lindelof or Bailly.
And if AWB got injured, who would've replaced him?
Probably one of Fosu-Mensah (before January), Lindelof or Bailly.
This shouldn’t have any implications on how hard we push for a CB. We’re in desperate need of one regardless of what happens with Tuanzebe.
Phil Jones is also back in full training after 18 months on the sidelines with a knee injury. The 29-year-old, who still has two years left on his contract plus a 12-month option, has not featured since January 2020.
TFM was awful anytime he came in, Lindelof was already in the team and Bailly was hardly fit.
Will be like a new signing.We are saved!
I think for the next two or three windows we will see a lot of loan's and swaps as clubs juggle the financial fall out from Covid.I don’t understand why we don’t sell these players if there is interest. This idea of loaning Williams and Axel makes little sense to me. This isn’t even to criticise the players, but the general strategy of loaning these players out to make room for replacements in their position. What is the point? If we get Trippier and Varane, then what happens to these players when they return from loan in a year? I just don’t understand the concept of trying to buy a right back, but not wanting to sell one that can’t get a game for you, only loan.
Whoah, why would you even contemplate something so terrible when we can sell him 5 years later when nobody wants him (including us).I don’t understand why we don’t sell these players if there is interest. This idea of loaning Williams and Axel makes little sense to me. This isn’t even to criticise the players, but the general strategy of loaning these players out to make room for replacements in their position. What is the point? If we get Trippier and Varane, then what happens to these players when they return from loan in a year? I just don’t understand the concept of trying to buy a right back, but not wanting to sell one that can’t get a game for you, only loan.
He does look like Lindelöf with a Spanish filter.
I don’t understand why we don’t sell these players if there is interest. This idea of loaning Williams and Axel makes little sense to me. This isn’t even to criticise the players, but the general strategy of loaning these players out to make room for replacements in their position. What is the point? If we get Trippier and Varane, then what happens to these players when they return from loan in a year? I just don’t understand the concept of trying to buy a right back, but not wanting to sell one that can’t get a game for you, only loan.
We should be selling with buy back options like Liverpool do but instead we keep them at the club and don’t play them which hinders their development and also reduces their value. Axel was good every bit as highly rated as Tomori 2 years ago - Chelsea just got 25m for him. We just do not sell players and it’s completely absurd.I don’t understand why we don’t sell these players if there is interest. This idea of loaning Williams and Axel makes little sense to me. This isn’t even to criticise the players, but the general strategy of loaning these players out to make room for replacements in their position. What is the point? If we get Trippier and Varane, then what happens to these players when they return from loan in a year? I just don’t understand the concept of trying to buy a right back, but not wanting to sell one that can’t get a game for you, only loan.
The play is normally to loan first to ramp the interest up further. Or at least it should be. Especially in Axel's case who has been an injury mess for a while. Williams should've been sold the season after his breakout when interest was sky-high and he was still on a low salary.I don’t understand why we don’t sell these players if there is interest. This idea of loaning Williams and Axel makes little sense to me. This isn’t even to criticise the players, but the general strategy of loaning these players out to make room for replacements in their position. What is the point? If we get Trippier and Varane, then what happens to these players when they return from loan in a year? I just don’t understand the concept of trying to buy a right back, but not wanting to sell one that can’t get a game for you, only loan.
That's because he physically looks quite like him. Just taller and a little more slight. It is a bit uncanny.He gives me serious Lindelof vibes.
That's because he physically looks quite like him. Just taller and a little more slight. It is a bit uncanny.
And also the shittest at heading the ballHim and Lindelof for the most handsome CB pairing in the league. I'm for it.
That's because he physically looks quite like him. Just taller and a little more slight. It is a bit uncanny.
What city players want to join spurs
100M + Jesus could be good business for them. He can play the Firmino role and free up Son / New RW they can get with 100M.
Yep, and from a club that will end-up being relegated, as is tradition.They’ll get at least 70mil for him.
Going from Harry Kane to Jesus would be like going from actual Jesus to that bearded wan who won the Eurovision a few years back.
Wouldn't be surprised if they took up his optionWe are saved!
Needs to massively bulk up.