Probably one of Fosu-Mensah (before January), Lindelof or Bailly.And if AWB got injured, who would've replaced him?
Probably one of Fosu-Mensah (before January), Lindelof or Bailly.And if AWB got injured, who would've replaced him?
TFM was awful anytime he came in, Lindelof was already in the team and Bailly was hardly fit.Probably one of Fosu-Mensah (before January), Lindelof or Bailly.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This shouldn’t have any implications on how hard we push for a CB. We’re in desperate need of one regardless of what happens with Tuanzebe.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I really dont think we'd loan him out if we didnt know at least with some certainty that someone comes in.This shouldn’t have any implications on how hard we push for a CB. We’re in desperate need of one regardless of what happens with Tuanzebe.
We are saved!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Phil Jones is also back in full training after 18 months on the sidelines with a knee injury. The 29-year-old, who still has two years left on his contract plus a 12-month option, has not featured since January 2020.
Yep. All of our RB options outside of AWB are terrible. This was also true a year ago.TFM was awful anytime he came in, Lindelof was already in the team and Bailly was hardly fit.
I don’t understand why we don’t sell these players if there is interest. This idea of loaning Williams and Axel makes little sense to me. This isn’t even to criticise the players, but the general strategy of loaning these players out to make room for replacements in their position. What is the point? If we get Trippier and Varane, then what happens to these players when they return from loan in a year? I just don’t understand the concept of trying to buy a right back, but not wanting to sell one that can’t get a game for you, only loan.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Will be like a new signing.We are saved!
I like the look of him.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I think for the next two or three windows we will see a lot of loan's and swaps as clubs juggle the financial fall out from Covid.I don’t understand why we don’t sell these players if there is interest. This idea of loaning Williams and Axel makes little sense to me. This isn’t even to criticise the players, but the general strategy of loaning these players out to make room for replacements in their position. What is the point? If we get Trippier and Varane, then what happens to these players when they return from loan in a year? I just don’t understand the concept of trying to buy a right back, but not wanting to sell one that can’t get a game for you, only loan.
Whoah, why would you even contemplate something so terrible when we can sell him 5 years later when nobody wants him (including us).I don’t understand why we don’t sell these players if there is interest. This idea of loaning Williams and Axel makes little sense to me. This isn’t even to criticise the players, but the general strategy of loaning these players out to make room for replacements in their position. What is the point? If we get Trippier and Varane, then what happens to these players when they return from loan in a year? I just don’t understand the concept of trying to buy a right back, but not wanting to sell one that can’t get a game for you, only loan.
This is so true! Imagine if Maguire was out and they were playing together!He does look like Lindelöf with a Spanish filter.
I think Williams is young enough that you loan him out and see how he does with a season in the PL under his belt. If he does well then he could have another season on loan or he comes back and pushes for a place. Certainly, Telles (and Trippier if we sign him) won't be around forever. If he does well and we decide Laird is ahead of him or he's not quite good enough then sell him next summer after we've hopefully had stadiums full and money flowing into the game again.I don’t understand why we don’t sell these players if there is interest. This idea of loaning Williams and Axel makes little sense to me. This isn’t even to criticise the players, but the general strategy of loaning these players out to make room for replacements in their position. What is the point? If we get Trippier and Varane, then what happens to these players when they return from loan in a year? I just don’t understand the concept of trying to buy a right back, but not wanting to sell one that can’t get a game for you, only loan.
We should be selling with buy back options like Liverpool do but instead we keep them at the club and don’t play them which hinders their development and also reduces their value. Axel was good every bit as highly rated as Tomori 2 years ago - Chelsea just got 25m for him. We just do not sell players and it’s completely absurd.I don’t understand why we don’t sell these players if there is interest. This idea of loaning Williams and Axel makes little sense to me. This isn’t even to criticise the players, but the general strategy of loaning these players out to make room for replacements in their position. What is the point? If we get Trippier and Varane, then what happens to these players when they return from loan in a year? I just don’t understand the concept of trying to buy a right back, but not wanting to sell one that can’t get a game for you, only loan.
He gives me serious Lindelof vibes.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The play is normally to loan first to ramp the interest up further. Or at least it should be. Especially in Axel's case who has been an injury mess for a while. Williams should've been sold the season after his breakout when interest was sky-high and he was still on a low salary.I don’t understand why we don’t sell these players if there is interest. This idea of loaning Williams and Axel makes little sense to me. This isn’t even to criticise the players, but the general strategy of loaning these players out to make room for replacements in their position. What is the point? If we get Trippier and Varane, then what happens to these players when they return from loan in a year? I just don’t understand the concept of trying to buy a right back, but not wanting to sell one that can’t get a game for you, only loan.
That's because he physically looks quite like him. Just taller and a little more slight. It is a bit uncanny.He gives me serious Lindelof vibes.
Similar strengths/weaknesses, too (in particular, lack of aerial ability).That's because he physically looks quite like him. Just taller and a little more slight. It is a bit uncanny.
And also the shittest at heading the ballHim and Lindelof for the most handsome CB pairing in the league. I'm for it.
I thought he looks more like DarmianThat's because he physically looks quite like him. Just taller and a little more slight. It is a bit uncanny.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
100M + Jesus could be good business for them. He can play the Firmino role and free up Son / New RW they can get with 100M.What city players want to join spurs
And Spurs turned it down? Sure.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Going from Harry Kane to Jesus would be like going from actual Jesus to that bearded wan who won the Eurovision a few years back.100M + Jesus could be good business for them. He can play the Firmino role and free up Son / New RW they can get with 100M.
Yep, and from a club that will end-up being relegated, as is tradition.They’ll get at least 70mil for him.
Going from Harry Kane to Jesus would be like going from actual Jesus to that bearded wan who won the Eurovision a few years back.
Wouldn't be surprised if they took up his optionWe are saved!
That's what we said about Lindelöf... And still do.Needs to massively bulk up.
This will end up happening, and could be the sort of deal that scuppers potential bargains this window by setting a precedent. We should be moving quickly for out targets.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date