Transfer Tweets - 2019/20 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.
We bought him for 75m + 15m in bonuses that he won’t have achieved. He’s been fecking wank. And people STILL moan when we get our money back. Give me fecking strength
We bought him for 75m+ add ons.
We are getting 60m + add ons.
Everton get 5m from that.

We are getting 55m guaranteed..
How is that getting our money back?
 
You’re cutting your nose off to spite your face in this argument - are you happy with Woodward?

The bloke gave Rooney and Sanchez absolute mega deals when they were busted flushes

Investment banker or not he’s fecking clueless
He's an easy target IMO, there's more than just him that's at fault. But he's the focal point of it all.

He's not in charge of contract negotiations is he?
 
Are you kidding? You managed to get most of the initial fee back for an unwanted player, desperate to leave, with only one club interested, after a very poor season. That was very good business from Woodward

Also of note, it almost certainly registers as a profit on your books, which once again, are the only thing that matters for a club like United

Why would it register as a profit?

We’re still obliged to pay any amortised fees to Everton even if he leaves.

We’ve sold him for a base fee of £15m less than the initial fee we bought him for.

What am I missing?
 
We’re stronger with Lukaku than without. I have no issue selling him, but if it’s true we’re finished then it’s been a pretty poor transfer window, and not the sort of window that was briefed at the start of the summer nor the sort of window you’d expect from an ambitious club that has underperformed for 6 years.
 
I'm sorry but Ole must take some blame too. If the owners weren't ready to pay for the transfers, he should have put pressure on them. Because ultimately his job doesn't end with giving a list to Woodward. I'm sure he knows how incompetent Woody is, he should have done more. Even now he's telling reporters he's happy even if no one else is brought in.

That's just nonsense, he's never going to start calling out the people who employ him, and no one should ask him to.

He will make the best of what he's got, and when it all unravels I hope the fans finally point the finger in the right direction this time.
 
We’re stronger with Lukaku than without. I have no issue selling him, but if it’s true we’re finished then it’s been a pretty poor transfer window, and not the sort of window that was briefed at the start of the summer nor the sort of window you’d expect from an ambitious club that has underperformed for 6 years.

We aren’t an ambitious club
 
The state of caf :lol: . We get rid of a technically limited player, who doesn't suit our current style, while getting back the big money we spent on him. And people still moan. Heck, even if he went for 55M I wouldn't have cared but just because it was Inter, I wanted every last penny from those cheapos, as payback for Perisic saga.
 
Yep. Which leaves us with one potential goalscorer who does not seem to know when to shoot and when not to, another who the slightest thing sends him into mental anguish and another who is a child.

Yep if we don’t buy a striker we’re in big trouble
 
Not in a million years. He is shockingly bad

Agreed. SAF had dolly/daisy and Rio/Vidic. He knew the importance of being solid at the back first.

With better defenders the full backs have more chances of generating overlaps up front and creating spaces and opportunities to isolate players. With better defenders we'll look much less vulnerable when the opposition counter.

I'm tired of seeing a gaping hole in our defence. I'm hoping with some preseason and new recruits Phelan can get them better organised.

SAF was famous for his attacking football but he never neglected the defence.
 
People are mot moaning because the donkey's left, they are moaning because they are afraid that no more players will be bought. If we buy no one else tomorrow, we are likely to be in for a very long and dull season.
 
I completely concur. This summer has proved that. We used to be though...so what’s changed?

Ferguson retired

The Glazers have been skinflints since day one but his genius masked it

Even when we have splashed the cash it was nothing special relative to our turnover and only arrived after years of under investment

People are clinging onto the hope that lads like Greenwood and Gomes getting blooded

Good luck with that, it’ll be people like Mata and Lingard stinking the place out, while Rashy will score about 14 for his 200k a week and Martial will fall out with his latest missus and have a year long breakdown

Fannies
 
Why would it register as a profit?

We’re still obliged to pay any amortised fees to Everton even if he leaves.

We’ve sold him for a base fee of £15m less than the initial fee we bought him for.

What am I missing?
No you don't. You still have to make the actual cash payments(if there are any still pending, but in this case you'll simply give them the money inter give you)

The moment you sell him he comes off the books. If you signed him for let's say 90(full add ons, bear with me here) on a five year deal then his value at this moment is £54m. By selling him for £60m you register an initial profit of £6m, which will rise once the add ons are met
 
I'm a fan of Big Rom and I think we're worst off without him. I just find it laughable that the same people who complained when he was part of the squad are now complaining that we've sold him and he hasn't been replaced.

Well I’m one of those people who think we are better off without Lukuku even if we don’t buy a replacement.

He’s a poor striker, and clearly he’s toxic. Very happy to throw his team mates under the bus, to try and promote himself.

Will be instantly forgotten, worst first team striker in 30 years for Utd (clearly I’m not talking about the likes of Dong or Bellion).
 
No you don't. You still have to make the actual cash payments(if there are any still pending, but in this case you'll simply give them the money inter give you)

The moment you sell him he comes off the books. If you signed him for let's say 90(full add ons, bear with me here) on a five year deal then his value at this moment is £54m. By selling him for £60m you register an initial profit of £6m, which will rise once the add ons are met
Exactly, this is a good deal for us.
 
Hopefully the board realize that we simply have to bring someone in before the deadline and that a deal has been lined up to be completed in the event of RL leaving. If that is not the case then yer again this summer has been an embarrassment. Holding judgement until tomorrow. For my 2 cents, I'd take Ben Yedder or Williams in an instant.
 
Amortization.

I addressed that in my post. Do people really think Inter are just going to transfer us that £60m in one go?

Base fees + add-ons shouldn’t be confused with amortisation. They have nothing to do with each other.
 
Wow so thats its Lukaku is gone.

Surely we could have let this carry on for a few weeks to get more a payment out of them? Unless we might get anyone in last minute and need the guaranteed cash.. Im predicting longstaff tomorrow.
 
Why would it register as a profit?

We’re still obliged to pay any amortised fees to Everton even if he leaves.

We’ve sold him for a base fee of £15m less than the initial fee we bought him for.

What am I missing?

Presumably as we're 2 years through his 5 year deal we internally list his value as 2/5 of what we bought him for.
 
What has this summer proved exactly?
If we were serious about competing we wouldn’t be going into the season with the current midfield and attacking options at the club. If the money is there we’d spend it. It isn’t there for spending. I’d actually argue the fact Mourinho completely lost the transfer plot probably showed it wasn’t there last year either despite the “we have 100m to spend on Varane” shite that was peddled. Most of us disliked him too much to notice though.
 
I addressed that in my post. Do people really think Inter are just going to transfer us that £60m in one go?

Base fees + add-ons shouldn’t be confused with amortisation. They have nothing to do with each other.

Lukaku's value on our books is c.£50m. We're making a loss on the transfer but it's a profit on the accounting book.
 
Spurs getting to MFs even though they have quality in that department, while we choose to disregard this area is very depressing.
 
Wow so thats its Lukaku is gone.

Surely we could have let this carry on for a few weeks to get more a payment out of them? Unless we might get anyone in last minute and need the guaranteed cash.. Im predicting longstaff tomorrow.

We have to put our tin foil hats on and cross fingers that selling Lukaku before the window means we get a 4th signing in. Also getting Lukaku out ASAP was necessary after whats gone on in recent days.
 
Well I’m one of those people who think we are better off without Lukuku even if we don’t buy a replacement.

He’s a poor striker, and clearly he’s toxic. Very happy to throw his team mates under the bus, to try and promote himself.

Will be instantly forgotten, worst first team striker in 30 years for Utd (clearly I’m not talking about the likes of Dong or Bellion).

True. I'm thinking he's Peter Davenport levels of bad.
 
I addressed that in my post. Do people really think Inter are just going to transfer us that £60m in one go?

Base fees + add-ons shouldn’t be confused with amortisation. They have nothing to do with each other.
You're the one who doesn't get it: amortization and payment are different things, unrelated
 
Spurs & arsenal will have a better window than us. Both also finished ahead of us last season. Fantastic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.