Where does that leave Lukaku
We'll still need to sell Lukaku.
We have a lot of time to sell, but barely any time to buy. No way are we selling Lukaku without getting in a replacementWe have a lot of time to sell our players. Our transfer window might be ending soon, but Italy have all the time they want.
I'd rather we moved on to replacing Herrera because we won't finish in the top four with the midfield we currently have.
I think it's been plainly obvious from the off that he's being pushed rather than wanting it. Definitely something new don't need even if the transfer muppets wouldn't care. You don't sign players who don't want to be at your club really. It rarely works out well.
we’re trying to save face by pulling out before being publicly rejected.
We have a lot of time to sell, but barely any time to buy. No way are we selling Lukaku without getting in a replacement
23 possibilities:
1) we’re pissed off that he’s hesitant and we’ve actually pulled the plug.
2) we’re trying to save face by pulling out before being publicly rejected.
3) we’re trying to put pressure on to get the deal done quickly.
AgreedHonestly if Dybala doesn't want to be here, we shouldn't be after him, don't want another Di Maria scenario.
Antonio #Conte : "It seemed first made for Lukaku at Inter, then everything was done with Juventus ... the reality is that as long as you don't have the agreement with the player and between clubs, until you sign, nothing is decided. We'll see, I don't know what it will happen; the company is working on the market
Edited with the English translation.What does that last sentence mean?
Does it though?Feels like the club have got their act together. Don’t sign players who don’t want to be here other than for the money.