United get rejected for 90m but Leicester accept 65m? Yeah, that makes sense.
Transfer Tweets - 2019/20 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting
- Thread starter KM
- Start date
- Status
United get rejected for 90m but Leicester accept 65m? Yeah, that makes sense.
And when City gets they player, they beat us to it. When we got the player, is always because City pulls out. How convenient.
Haha. first Koulibaly and now Maguire.. both valuations dropped from 150/90m to 95/65m.
Woody not falling for any made up number right away must be a sign of improvement.. that clown got taken for a ride for 6 years... finally getting some sense.
The absolute state of so called 'newspapers' in this country! Anything connected to Utd...inflate the transfer fee by 25-30%, any other club reduce by 25%! Beyond pathetic how transparent their agenda is, but Utd news generates clicks like no other club so they will carry on.
Has transfer window journalism (I use the word journalism extremely reluctantly) ever been this insanely erratic and borderline nonsensical in terms of the constantly shifting numbers involved, degree of progress involved in transactions etc.? As others have said, you're literally wasting your time bothering at this point.
Yes, every year.
Why do we get quoted close to £90 million?
Ye I wasn't having a go mate, more just responding to the general idea that seems to have made its way around that he's useless going forward. Also, thought the article was a really interesting read and goes into really good detail about all aspects of his game.
If Maguire is going for 65M, then we should buy, in my opinion.
United and Palace officials have been in talks since the weekend over a fee for the England Under-21 right-back, with the Selhurst Park club wanting at least £50m guaranteed for the 21-year-old.
Palace also want United to remove the sell-on clause that was part of the deal that took Wilfried Zaha back to Palace in January 2015.
How do you poise yourself to do something?
Poised:
H having a composed and self-assured manner.
No mention of us in De Ligt article at all. I really think we are truly out of the race for him. He's not coming here. It's Maguire or none
It’s ridiculous how long this is taking. What is Woody doing every day? He has one job to focus on right now.
Any tweets from The Sun today?
How do you poise yourself to do something?
Poised:
H having a composed and self-assured manner.
That's more like it. No more poising crap, just sign them.
Your post in the thread Transfer Tweets - 2019/20 | Excess moaning or posting non-transfer tweets = threadban, no exceptions was deleted. Reason: Repeat after me: The. Sun. Is. Blacklisted.
09:15
09:15
The. Sun. Is. Blacklisted.
#Juventus : growing optimism for #Rabiot . Possible final agreement by the weekend
Didn't Real splash like 50 million on Militao just recently ? Varane is also a starter there . Unless Miliato is prospect ,where is DeLigt going to play ?
We reportedly pulled out a few weeks ago when it became obvious that Raiola had simply used us to get him a better deal elsewhere.
Definitely not coming here.
With all our money and our might we should be storming the transfers market but somehow it doesn't happen.
That's more like it. No more poising crap, just sign them.
I actually thought I'd deleted that one
Juve have been linked with literally every play going !
Juve are interested until they hear the price, like all Italian teams.
McDonell was full of shit, what a surprising twist.
He wasn’t taken over United, but Spurs. There is a big difference. It is like saying Brendan Roger took 4 years to make leceister top four and champions league finalist over Lampard at Chelsea. Difference in the quality of the squad and resource is a big factor. Plus, I believe it took Poch only 1 season to make spurs top four candidate.
Wouldn't surprise me, Juventus are shrew gits with free transfers, wish our club would take more advantage of them over the years.
City are known to leak much lowered transfer fees to the press. They like to keep up this absurd pretence of doing things on a shoe string budget. It’s totally pathetic
Whereas we leak higher fees to the press right? Yet somehow with their lower leaked fees and our higher leaked fees, we’ve both spent roughly the same if you took a look at the respective accounts of both teams over the past 6 years. Maybe the ABU media now also prepare both set of accounts too? Did the USA fake the moon landing too?
He doesn’t have just one job to focus on right now, though. That’s part of the problem and why we need a DoF (or whatever the hell the club wants to call it).
I can’t tell if you’re agreeing with me or bollocking me here. City like to portray this image that they’re not paying players top level wages but their accounts show they pay about 10k less per player per month than United, whilst they’ve also been exposed for paying managers massive ‘fees’ indirectly.
They're having our pants right down it that's what we give them.
- Status