Transfer Tweets - 2019/20 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.
I love the way fans who know nothing think it’s all like FManager.

If it was you would all be in better jobs....
 
So overpriced average British players it is. Imagine spending 130 to 150 mill on Maguire and AWB
Couldn't care less how much it cost if they are who we want.
 
Would mean we're shipping De Gea out, possibly back to Atletico where he came from. Oblak is a a big all round improvement based on current state of things.
If it's De Gea going the other way and us paying £30m I'd be fine. But I really want to see the bulk of our money spent on outfield players.
 
It will be soo typical of us these days to sign these two overhyped players for 130m. When we could sign Cancelo (45m) and Alderweirald (25m) for a combined 70m. Both of these two players are better on the ball, plus we could also fill several other holes in the squad, and sign Van de beek (35m) and Ziyech for another 30m (total spent 130m). This will result in us signing 4 players instead of 2 and a far better and balanced squad than shelling out 130m for these two.

Plus the biggest problem i see with them is we will be paying a premium on players with either very obvious weeknesses. Maguire is prone to lack of pace, whereas AWB is average going forward.

Agree with this 100%. Do not think most of the fans here see it the same way and who knows what decision is made and who makes them at the club.
 
I love the way fans who know nothing think it’s all like FManager.

If it was you would all be in better jobs....

To be fair to Football Manager, they are proper scouts and researchers who more than often get it right on the game! Signed KdB and Lukaku at 17 for Ajax on the recommendation of a scout! Everything else is pretty much like a computer game though!
 
It will be soo typical of us these days to sign these two overhyped players for 130m. When we could sign Cancelo (45m) and Alderweirald (25m) for a combined 70m. Both of these two players are better on the ball, plus we could also fill several other holes in the squad, and sign Van de beek (35m) and Ziyech for another 30m (total spent 130m). This will result in us signing 4 players instead of 2 and a far better and balanced squad than shelling out 130m for these two.

Plus the biggest problem i see with them is we will be paying a premium on players with either very obvious weeknesses. Maguire is prone to lack of pace, whereas AWB is average going forward. I can bet Pep would never sign AWB due to his shortcomings going forward and him being technically very average, then when our defenders will be punting foward when pressed against any decent opposition, then they will again be blaming Ole for not having game plan etc.

We need technically sound players who can avoid press and for those players i dont mind us paying premium. For example i won't bat an eyelid if we spend 100m on De Ligt or another 100m on De Jong, as you can actually see their supreme technical ability along with the potential to be world class in next 2 years.
Way too much sense in one post. Make this dude (or girl) the DOF
There's always something with us isn't there. Either it is full on galacticos or only English
We need to be smart, all the players mentioned in the quoted post would improve us and would be way better investment than AWB and Maguire. Sad to see the club act all dumb, again. But hey, I've almost reached the point where I expect nothing from our club but excellence at being shite
 
It will be soo typical of us these days to sign these two overhyped players for 130m. When we could sign Cancelo (45m) and Alderweirald (25m) for a combined 70m. Both of these two players are better on the ball, plus we could also fill several other holes in the squad, and sign Van de beek (35m) and Ziyech for another 30m (total spent 130m). This will result in us signing 4 players instead of 2 and a far better and balanced squad than shelling out 130m for these two.

Plus the biggest problem i see with them is we will be paying a premium on players with either very obvious weeknesses. Maguire is prone to lack of pace, whereas AWB is average going forward. I can bet Pep would never sign AWB due to his shortcomings going forward and him being technically very average, then when our defenders will be punting foward when pressed against any decent opposition, then they will again be blaming Ole for not having game plan etc.

We need technically sound players who can avoid press and for those players i dont mind us paying premium. For example i won't bat an eyelid if we spend 100m on De Ligt or another 100m on De Jong, as you can actually see their supreme technical ability along with the potential to be world class in next 2 years.

Good post! That’s what would happen if Ed and his staff are competent and sensible.

Most fans would prefer the one or two big name signings but then will complain about why we haven’t solved our problems afterwards and blame a shitty window/transfer business.
 
It's a bit funny we're supposedly in for Maguire after that exact move was overruled last year. And it was nearly the same price if I remember correctly.
 
I really just can't understand these fees these days. Like who in their right mind would pay £75M for Harry fecking Maguire?! He's a decent player but nowhere near that amount of money. I also rate AWB very highly and want us to sign him but anything over £40M is a joke. The transfer market is completely broken.
 
I mean when Fergie said there’s no value in the market when Eden Hazard is moving for £30m you could argue with him. I couldn’t blame us for not signing Maguire if they’re asking for £75m. Utterly ridiculous.
 
I mean when Fergie said there’s no value in the market when Eden Hazard is moving for £30m you could argue with him. I couldn’t blame us for not signing Maguire if they’re asking for £75m. Utterly ridiculous.
If Hazard is moving for £30m, I’d
Wonder why we aren’t in for him
 
I mean when Fergie said there’s no value in the market when Eden Hazard is moving for £30m you could argue with him. I couldn’t blame us for not signing Maguire if they’re asking for £75m. Utterly ridiculous.

Agreed. I refuse to go to the cinema theater now because back in the day you could see a double feature for 10 cents.
 
It's funny - if Ed bothered splashing the cash last season in defense he wouldn't be fleeced as much this year.
 
It's funny - if Ed bothered splashing the cash last season in defense he wouldn't be fleeced as much this year.

At the risk of being thread-banned for posting non transfer tweet related.

Ed will get fleeced regardless. There is absolutely no respect when it comes to dealing with Ed. Players can demand whatever they want to come here and other teams offer us players they no longer want for ludicrous sums.

I heard we were offered Perisic for a Lukaku straight swap. I also heard we turned them down but how stupid other clubs must think our higher ups are at this football related end of the business.
 
One can argue that fergie wasn’t adapting with how football was evolving.

I agree, football has always progressively inflated with time it was outrageous for us to spend 30 million on a teenager in Rooney previously. Numerous years later 70 million will get you a competent defender, it's not as bad as it sounds from an objective perspective.

If every premier league team is essentially strapped for cash due to TV rights / sponsorship why has our club's financial resources not escalated to a higher feat ? We can't boast about financial resources and fold when it matters (Sancho, Maguire) clearly it's due to the Glazer's.
 
If I could earn 4x my current wage by changing employer I wouldn’t give a feck about gratitude. But that’s me.

At your level it'd be life changing though.
At Maguire's level, not anywhere near as much.
 
One can argue that fergie wasn’t adapting with how football was evolving.

To the crazy economics yes and in terms of the power of agents. I think he did stop adapting towards the end. That had always been a strength for him previously.

I agree, football has always progressively inflated with time it was outrageous for us to spend 30 million on a teenager in Rooney previously. Numerous years later 70 million will get you a competent defender, it's not as bad as it sounds from an objective perspective.

If every premier league team is essentially strapped for cash due to TV rights / sponsorship why has our club's financial resources not escalated to a higher feat ? We can't boast about financial resources and fold when it matters (Sancho, Maguire) clearly it's due to the Glazer's.

Not in my opinion. He refused to bow down to silly agent fees because it would set a precedent that we're there to get fleeced. He was ahead of the game in minimizing social media use for players around the club because he knew what a big distraction it would cause.

Take Raiola - does Pep like to deal with him? Are Barcelona reportedly succumbing to agent fees? Do you see Klopp + Liverpool's efficient structure, or Bayern's structure bowing down to the same?

Definately for another thread but whatever Fergie did, he did it because he knew where the market was turning and you don't want to get into a vicious circle.
 
Not in my opinion. He refused to bow down to silly agent fees because it would set a precedent that we're there to get fleeced. He was ahead of the game in minimizing social media use for players around the club because he knew what a big distraction it would cause.

Take Raiola - does Pep like to deal with him? Are Barcelona reportedly succumbing to agent fees? Do you see Klopp + Liverpool's efficient structure, or Bayern's structure bowing down to the same?

Definately for another thread but whatever Fergie did, he did it because he knew where the market was turning and you don't want to get into a vicious circle.

City regularly top the agent fees list. Liverpool topped it last year. Bayern are falling behind and Barca simply can’t afford big money on De Ligt.

Our destiny would have been greatly different if we had landed Aguero and Hazard.
 
City regularly top the agent fees list. Liverpool topped it last year. Bayern are falling behind and Barca simply can’t afford big money on De Ligt.

Our destiny would have been greatly different if we had landed Aguero and Hazard.

Liverpool bought shed loads of players - they'd top it by default of such a large turnover.
 
They spent more than City and United combined. The idea that they’re not paying agents big fees is wrong.

They brought in more players, so they'd pay more agent fees. Hardly a point to make is it? We are known for bending over for paying over the odds, and selling at fraction of true value. Look at the agent fees we paid Raiola :lol: I wouldn't be surprised if our agent fees in bringing Pogba in topped everything Liverpool did last year.
 
They brought in more players, so they'd pay more agent fees. Hardly a point to make is it? We are known for bending over for paying over the odds, and selling at fraction of true value. Look at the agent fees we paid Raiola :lol: I wouldn't be surprised if our agent fees in bringing Pogba in topped everything Liverpool did last year.

They’ve paid more than us in 3 of the past 5 seasons.

Totals over 5 years

Liverpool - £105.35m

United - £81.88m
 
Status
Not open for further replies.