I think that you might be Ed Woodward, you have infiltrated the caf. Firstly I was one of many excited when Sanchez came, don't think many could have seen how disappointing he'd be. I disagree with you about the contract with Sanchez, yes there was no transfer fee but he had only a few months left on his contract and we swapped a player for him. He was definitely not in his prime when he came here, he was being benched by Arsenal and not performing to the standard he was a while before. We thought a new start was what was needed and he could work under Jose, let's not rewrite history, he was in bad form the end of previous season. He definitely was going to be on big wages, nobody would argue that. What you should argue is that how much more than our top earners he would be on, the potential 70 grand a week bonus for starting games that the BBC reported the other day. That's scandalous if true, doesn't take a genius to figure out that's not going to sit well with some. Especially with many players with contract renewals coming up. That's just poor long term planning, Ed Woodward has to take blame. Jose didn't give a feck if we were paying him a million a week, he was never here for the long term. The contract to me wasn't properly thought out. It was in one part stopping city from getting stronger, secondly trying to make a statement marquee signing without thinking of long term consequence. That deal was poorly planned and it felt reactionary, it's not like we offered 10 grand more than city did.
That's the point isn't it, our transfer policy has been erratic. From buying Fellaini in a Summer for more than we had to, from buying Paul Pogba on a record fee as an investment. Managers definitely had a say in our transfer plans but Ed Woodward is not getting a pass, responsibility has to be taken. He's played a huge part in the mess that we are currently in.
Darmian could have be sold last summer, Italian clubs were put off the price. Yeah you can't fleeced but what's the point keeping someone who isn't going to play. Somebody who wants to move on and isn't close to second choice. I'm not going in to with the chuckle brothers at the back. If you think keeping Smalling and Jones on long term contract was a wise move then you must have been in hibernation since Fergie left, we aren't getting back to the top with these two starting regular.
Where is the long term planning, accountability and most importantly responsibility? Ed Woodward was appointed by the Glazers to help the club on and off the pitch. He's got many commercial deals off the pitch but unless the club start performing on it then that's not sustainable forever. Blame can't be pinned on one individual but it must be shared. Your delusional if you think this summer will run smoothly, we only have other Summers to compare it to. We need a DOF who is planning for the next five to ten years, that's with a route from the academy to first team, recruitment of youth/experience and preparing for exits. It's not about letting better players leave because of poor contract negotiations, keeping players in obvious decline and relying on one window to fix it all. Sick of Glazer sympathisers in here. You can construct your posts as elegant as you want, doesn't change that there is flawed points throughout it.
Sanchez was in his prime in thatbhe had just turned 29 years of age. That is a prime age for an athlete. 3 months of patchy form wasn’t used against him. He scored 24 league goals the season before I think. I’m not defending his form, he’s obviously been rubbish, and I suspect that the reaction will be to try and offload him. That’s life. But i do think the decisions were right at the time. In the 3 months or so that preceded Sanchez’ signing, the criticism at the time was why we were not signing Sanchez and letting City sign him. At that point, that was the topic of his incompetence. Because we as fans have become so bitter with our plight, us signing a top player in Sanchez can only possibly be summarised as ‘it was in one part stopping city from getting stronger, secondly trying to make a statement marquee signing without thinking of long term consequence.’ People keep saying ‘I’m not saying Ed doesn’t know business, he just doesn’t know football’. These are business decisions.
In summary, I don’t think fans should be microanalalysing a club’s executive. The main points, I would think, would only be whether they refuse to spend money or if they refuse to sack underperforming managers or hire poor managers. For me, looking at Woodward’s tenure, I don’t think those accusations are valid. I guess last summer gave detractors something to cling to finally, but in all the years, he has spent money and backed his managers. We have had summers where we have added Di Maria, Falcao, Blind, Herrera and Shaw, we have had summers where we have added Pogba, Ibrahimovic, Mkhitaryan and Bailly. These are players that were unanimously accepted as top players, and many of which were our caf favourites. Of course, they haven’t worked out, but I think the hypocrisy is it seems fans want him to take the decisions on personnel and make himself a football manager. After all, we are criticising the players signed when these were the managers choices. Do we want Ed making football decisions?
Those clinging to Darmian are clutching at straws. We could/should have sold him, but ultimately, nobody cares if we’re being honest and his value is negligible. As for Smalling and Jones, you are again requesting Ed Woodward to play football manager and decide that these players aren’t that good and put them up for sale. He doesn’t make those decisions. No executive should be criticised for extending contracts of players their manager wants to keep.
The obsession with a DoF who will make our troubles all go away is something I get a bit. Manchester United have always operated without one. Our managers make decisions on style of play and personnel. The reason DoF’s are important outside of United is because typically, there is high turnover of manager. That requires different styles and requirements for different players. It is no easier to sign or sell with a DoF. If Ole was guaranteed to stay for a decade then there is absolutely no need for one.
Regarding this summer, I didn’t say I was confident overall. I am confident with Ed Woodward’s ability to do his portion of the job. We may not get who we want. But his role is to try to get the players Ole identifies, and commit the funds to get the deals done. I expect him to do that, so why would I have an issue with Woodward? You speak of previous summers, where I also mentioned summers where we spent a lot of money on top players. I imagine that if we did that again this summer, and they were the players the manager wants, that he could be seen to have ‘done his job’. It will then be over to Ole. If he fails, he will eventually be sacked, and we will look for another proven or talented manager to begin his own project. I agree that we could use a DoF because if that happens, we want to avoid having to change several players.