Transfer Tweets - 2018/19 | Remember if posting foreign language tweets to post in English too

Status
Not open for further replies.
It seems I can keep posting these stats forever and no one reads them. He's had 1 serious injury, that's it!

17/18 Hamstring Injury Nov 2, 2017 Mar 11, 2018 129 days 29
16/17 Knee injury Oct 17, 2016 Dec 1, 2016 45 days 9
14/15 Hamstring Injury Jan 12, 2015 Mar 2, 2015 49 days 8
14/15 Thigh problems Sep 18, 2014 Sep 25, 2014 7 days 2
12/13 groin strain Nov 12, 2012 Nov 19, 2012 7 days 1
11/12 Strain in the thigh and gluteal muscles Jan 23, 2012 Feb 9, 2012 17 days 2
11/12 Thigh problems Dec 5, 2011 Jan 2, 2012 28 days 3
11/12 Malleolar injury Oct 3, 2011 Oct 13, 2011 10 days

45 days is a lengthy absence, as is 49. In his 4 seasons in the Premier League, 3 of those he has had lengthy spells on the sidelines, and his most recent one being the worst one yet.

He's a very good player when he's on the pitch, but it's not outrageous to consider him a bit of a risk given his most recent injury. Between Bailly, Rojo and Jones, we have more than enough defenders who can't really be depended on to be fit. If Alderweireld hadn't have been out for such a spell this season, it'd be a no brainer, but he's looked a bit ropey in those few games he played since returning. £40m for a 29 year old just coming off the back of missing over half the season is a risk.
 
Yeah. Seen more links to Arteta though. Even Vieira has been mentioned.
Yeah, which is strange. Arteta seems the most heavily linked, due to recent history with the club - neither seem to be particularly strong candidates IMO.
 
So, we get Fred and City are after Jorginho? That about sums up the difference between second place and first place. Just that little bit more quality in all their acquisitions. (assuming they do get Jorginho, of course)
IMHO Fred or a mobile CM who can cover a lot of ground, do the dirty work at the same time be technically good is exactly what we need.
Jorginho ain't the most mobile or agile, something which we clearly lack in our midfield.
Not to mention City were after Fred for many months also shows Pep rates him highly.
I just don't understand how a player suddenly turns into site just as we are about to sign them.

@Saf94 yeah it's the pulling power of coaches that decides which players join a team.
Guess thats why City were able to buy all those players right after the Shek took over.
Also that explains why Hazard decided to sign for Chelsea, we only had the greatest manager ever.
Money speaks louder than anything in the modern game.
Also which are the 'top signings' City made under Pep? They have bought well, with a clear plan, that I agree but we have bought more superstars.
 
I'd love it if we had a signing before the FA cup final on Saturday and gave them a run out at some point in the game. Imagine how demoralising that would be for Chelsea?
 
IMHO Fred or a mobile CM who can cover a lot of ground, do the dirty work at the same time be technically good is exactly what we need.
Jorginho ain't the most mobile or agile, something which we clearly lack in our midfield.
Not to mention City were after Fred for many months also shows Pep rates him highly.
I just don't understand how a player suddenly turns into site just as we are about to sign them.

@Saf94 yeah it's the pulling power of coaches that decides which players join a team.
Guess thats why City were able to buy all those players right after the Shek took over.
Also that explains why Hazard decided to sign for Chelsea, we only had the greatest manager ever.
Money speaks louder than anything in the modern game.
Also which are the 'top signings' City made under Pep? They have bought well, with a clear plan, that I agree but we have bought more superstars.

So how come City suddenly managed to sign much much better players right after Pep joined? They weren’t getting Sane, Jesus, Gundogan, Laporte, Bernardo etc before Pep. Those are genuine world class players of the level neither they previously or many other teams currently are doing.

And how come we weren’t signing Pogba, Ibra etc before Mou came?

Both City and us have always had money so why the stark difference? And we didn’t get Hazard because Fergie wouldn’t pay the agent fees, that’s been common knowledge for ages.

Players join where they can succeed and the manager plays a huge role. Players want to play under the manager who will get the best out of them and the team. Yes money talks but for the most part players want a great career and a lot of teams have money these days.
 
I'd love it if we had a signing before the FA cup final on Saturday and gave them a run out at some point in the game. Imagine how demoralising that would be for Chelsea?

Would we be allowed to play the new signing so soon? I imagine registration is for next season
 
I would take him for our RW.

You have already had him.

Early window waheee!

Looking forward to the posts like:
"City is leading in transfers 3:0"
"everybody is buying players yet we're sitting there and doing nothing."
"he's already 28, we have become a retirement home."

Cut the middleman and go for De Ligt. He is going to be a superstar. Alderweireld is 29 and seems to have one lengthy injury ever season.

:lol:
 
Duncan Castles saying Mourinho spoke a lot with Neymar before his move to PSG to try to get him to United, until PSG paid the release clause. He then says that Neymar told the owners at PSG that he wanted a managerial change at PSG and suggested Mourinho.
 
At which point we've become a club who's chasing 29 year olds. Why can't we go got young and promising players?
 
So how come City suddenly managed to sign much much better players right after Pep joined? They weren’t getting Sane, Jesus, Gundogan, Laporte, Bernardo etc before Pep. Those are genuine world class players of the level neither they previously or many other teams currently are doing.

And how come we weren’t signing Pogba, Ibra etc before Mou came?

Both City and us have always had money so why the stark difference? And we didn’t get Hazard because Fergie wouldn’t pay the agent fees, that’s been common knowledge for ages.

Players join where they can succeed and the manager plays a huge role. Players want to play under the manager who will get the best out of them and the team. Yes money talks but for the most part players want a great career and a lot of teams have money these days.
None of the players you listed were world class when city signed them. And the manager isn't the be all and end all. The likes of Aguero, Silva, Kompany, De Bruyne all signed before Pep joined, to be part of the 'project'.
 

Whats the gag?

29 and a succession of injuries, including his most recent one where he missed 6 months versus 29 with a good fitness record coming off a strong season are very different from one another.

I wasn't against the signing of 29 year old Sanchez, nor a 29 year old RVP who had proven he could finally stay fit after a few years of injuries. a 29 year old Alderweireld immediately after a very bad hamstring injury and a 6 month lay off is concerning.
 
People already acting like Jorginho is vastly superior to Fred just cause Pep is after him despite the fact Pep was after Fred too.
Its going to be a fun summer.
 
At which point we've become a club who's chasing 29 year olds. Why can't we go got young and promising players?

We signed Lindelof and Bailly when they were 22 and 23 I think. What's wrong with signing a more experienced - and possibly better - CB?
 
Would we be allowed to play the new signing so soon? I imagine registration is for next season
What's the point of the window opening on Thursday if we can't register a player then? We could sign a player last month and not register them right? Thought they'd brought it forward because of the World Cup?
 
Duncan Castles saying Mourinho spoke a lot with Neymar before his move to PSG to try to get him to United, until PSG paid the release clause. He then says that Neymar told the owners at PSG that he wanted a managerial change at PSG and suggested Mourinho.
:drool:

Neymar is welcomed to join on loan with option to buy anytime:smirk:
 
What's the point of the window opening on Thursday if we can't register a player then? We could sign a player last month and not register them right? Thought they'd brought it forward because of the World Cup?
We can register them as our players. We can't register them for the current ongoing competitions.

It was moved forward because the deadline is August 9th this year and Fifa have a rule that the window has to be at least 12 weeks.
 
So how come City suddenly managed to sign much much better players right after Pep joined? They weren’t getting Sane, Jesus, Gundogan, Laporte, Bernardo etc before Pep. Those are genuine world class players of the level neither they previously or many other teams currently are doing.

And how come we weren’t signing Pogba, Ibra etc before Mou came?

Both City and us have always had money so why the stark difference? And we didn’t get Hazard because Fergie wouldn’t pay the agent fees, that’s been common knowledge for ages.

Players join where they can succeed and the manager plays a huge role. Players want to play under the manager who will get the best out of them and the team. Yes money talks but for the most part players want a great career and a lot of teams have money these days.
You do realise we signed players like Angel Di Maria and Falcao under LVG without CL football.
And if playing under a great manager meant so so much, how come Hazard didn't push for a United move? Yes managers are important when it comes to players taking their decision but to say we are getting inferior players because Pep has more pulling power than Mourinho us ridiculous especially when we beat his highness Pep to signing of Sanchez a few months back
 
What's the point of the window opening on Thursday if we can't register a player then? We could sign a player last month and not register them right? Thought they'd brought it forward because of the World Cup?

I think we could reach an agreement but not register last week. I’m just guessing here so I defer to someone reading the official guidelines

Edit:
Thank you @Nick7
 


6 year contract after his first season at the club.


Strange, he signed for a big sum so expected him to be on decent wages. I'd say he's looked good but not enough for a major rise in wages, and what with spurs being stingy anyway this doesn't make much sense.
 


6 year contract after his first season at the club.


Covering themselves in the event of losing another defender? Or exactly what Poch was looking for? Odd, would have thought there were others much higher on the list for a new contract.
 

According to Il Messaggero, Milinkovic-Savic has offers from PSG, Real Madrid, Bayern Munich and Manchester United.
 

Gazzetta dello Sport: Juve are planning an expensive loan, with an obligation to buy for around €50m, which would be payable in installments.
 
Maybe that? And SMS is the replacement

Veratti tried to leaved last year and we know what happened. Such a crybaby tactic wont work on those Sheikh. But whose gonna buy him if indeed he can leave? No way PSG agree with Juve's tactic to pay year by year. Only viable option is Barca, Madrid, City, United. That include Neymar also.
 
Veratti tried to leaved last year and we know what happened. Such a crybaby tactic wont work on those Sheikh. But whose gonna buy him if indeed he can leave? No way PSG agree with Juve's tactic to pay year by year. Only viable option is Barca, Madrid, City, United. That include Neymar also.
Juventus is rumored in the previous page is looking at him. Verratti and his old agent went behind PSG back last summer and then publicly shamed them coming out with the ambition talk. PSG went to respond in such manner with Neymar transfer (behind Barcelona back). In a scenario where PSG is willing to get new idea (SMS in this case maybe) and trying to work around FFP, and with the other club approach formally and respectfully, it's different altogether.
 
Juve interested in Verratti? Typical, they always seem to buy only midfielders every summer.


Gazzetta dello Sport: Juve are planning an expensive loan, with an obligation to buy for around €50m, which would be payable in installments.


Hope this doesn't mean Chelsea go for Icardi. Class striker, don't want him joining them. However, Crouch is available.:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.