AndyJ1985
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2016
- Messages
- 8,954
Everton are even worse than us when it comes to spending money. They've spent almost £100m on Sigurdson and Richalison
Absolutely mental, Richarlison looks a good talent but the money takes the Mick.Everton are even worse than us when it comes to spending money. They've spent almost £100m on Sigurdson and Richalison
Wasn't there a report of Giroud wanted to stay in London thus forcing Arsenal to sell him to Chelsea? Arsenal initially wanted to push him to Dortmund as part of Aubameyang
Not sure. Dortmund, Ruhr is considered the busiest urban area in Germany(?)Dortmund is a bit of a shit hole compared to london. Madrid is probably a better draw.
Of course not. Since moving clubs it’s clear that Mkhitaryan has performed better than Sanchez has.
That’s not to say that it’s guaranteed that Mkhitaryan has a better season this season, but I’ll go ahead and stick my neck on the line by saying that I think he will. I don’t think Sanchez fits into what Mourinho wants (or he hasn’t found a way to fit Sanchez in yet). It was noticeable from the games I saw that once Sanchez came in you looked more disjointed going forward.
Edit: I should add that I do think Sanchez is the better player, with far more ability than Mkhitaryan has.
I'm not sure why you seem to think Mkhitaryan has performed really well in comparison to Sanchez when he hasn't. Both have near identical outputs and are yet to settle. What is clear though is Sanchez is proven quality whilst Mkhitaryan is still the unknown. One is world class the other isn't.
You also said that Arsenal got the better deal which is crazy as Sanchez was, and still is, the most valuable asset. Fact is the deal was great business by United irrespective of how either performed for the 3 months left of the season.
It would be silly to try and suggest otherwise.
No he hasn't. While Sanchez was far from great for us he did put in some excellent performances and scored one of the most important goals of our season. What did Mkhitaryan do? I remember him having about two good games and then going back to his old inconsistent self.Of course not. Since moving clubs it’s clear that Mkhitaryan has performed better than Sanchez has.
That’s not to say that it’s guaranteed that Mkhitaryan has a better season this season, but I’ll go ahead and stick my neck on the line by saying that I think he will. I don’t think Sanchez fits into what Mourinho wants (or he hasn’t found a way to fit Sanchez in yet). It was noticeable from the games I saw that once Sanchez came in you looked more disjointed going forward.
Edit: I should add that I do think Sanchez is the better player, with far more ability than Mkhitaryan has.
Carlos Vela, Aspas, Thauvin, Douglas Costa, Mahrez( before he went to City)etc.. literally anyone of them would be an improvement over Mata. It's not like we don't have low profile options, for some reason we always stick with 1-2 options to buy.
Is anyone on our board know about backup plans anymore? Since Ronaldo left we've only signed Valencia as his replacement, it was a fecking decade ago. Fergie with his inexplicable truth for Nani/Valencia & youngsters I could understand but Moyes wanted Bale or no one, LvG wanted Muller or no one, just why?
Why? They probably don't rate Dembele and Willian is a top player (at least in my view). He was great against them in the CL for instance. Coutinho, Messi and Willian behind Suarez. Not bad that! They are probably lacking a midfielder though.
Not sure. Dortmund, Ruhr is considered the busiest urban area in Germany(?)
Dembele is way better than Willian
I think they are buying Willian to play a supporting role, helping Dembele to adjust to the new surroundings by lifting some pressure of his shoulders.Hoping Willian joins Barca and we get Dembele.
I think he will suit us more especially if we are playing a counter attacking system.I don't rate Dembele. A light-weight Nani, sure he'll be extremely frustrating in the PL.
Leipzig want Ademola Lookman
Dembele is way better than Willian
I'm not sure why you seem to think Mkhitaryan has performed really well in comparison to Sanchez when he hasn't. Both have near identical outputs and are yet to settle. What is clear though is Sanchez is proven quality whilst Mkhitaryan is still the unknown. One is world class the other isn't.
You also said that Arsenal got the better deal which is crazy as Sanchez was, and still is, the most valuable asset. Fact is the deal was great business by United irrespective of how either performed for the 3 months left of the season.
It would be silly to try and suggest otherwise.
I won’t dispute that United got the better asset in that deal, but that only counts for something if Sanchez actually performs to the levels that he did at Arsenal. For the most part he hasn’t come close to that.No he hasn't. While Sanchez was far from great for us he did put in some excellent performances and scored one of the most important goals of our season. What did Mkhitaryan do? I remember him having about two good games and then going back to his old inconsistent self.
A bit weird for Benzema to throw shade when he extorted a member of his own National team
Indeed. Wonder what Di Marzio's answer would be.This does hurt Di Marzio's reputation though.