Sammyjunn
New Member
Hope we bid 100million on James, must be unhappy under Benitez with another place on the bench.
43.5m pounds is 60m euros. I doubt Schalke would turn that down, if true.
City do overpay but the get their man usually.
While United try to overpay and still dont get their man.
City do overpay but the get their man usually.
Overpaying is meaningless to them. Their owner is trying to make them the best team in the world and has money to burn.
While United try to overpay and still dont get their man.
Its because our targets are not gettable... Bale, neymar, Mueller etc.
They target sterling, kdb, Otamendi and do overpay but get their man. They have a great team now with possibly the most potent attack in the epl.
Apparently our board thought Silva was too slow.... We didn't bid on isco for the same reason. What the feck goes on in that board is beyond me.
So we went for Mata instead.Its because our targets are not gettable... Bale, neymar, Mueller etc.
They target sterling, kdb, Otamendi and do overpay but get their man. They have a great team now with possibly the most potent attack in the epl.
Apparently our board thought Silva was too slow.... We didn't bid on isco for the same reason. What the feck goes on in that board is beyond me.
Its because our targets are not gettable... Bale, neymar, Mueller etc.
They target sterling, kdb, Otamendi and do overpay but get their man. They have a great team now with possibly the most potent attack in the epl.
Apparently our board thought Silva was too slow.... We didn't bid on isco for the same reason. What the feck goes on in that board is beyond me.
Are City really a great team though. When Kompany is missing most teams in PL look like they can beat City. Certainly City cant keep a clean sheet without him. And that's with them overpaying for both Otamendi and Mangala.
Mangala was a mistake, Otamendi was not... With kompany out they do look fragile in the back but their offence is potent. With their ambition and money they will get it right soon enough. I wish I had that same faith in our board but sadly I don't.
So we went for Mata instead.
Get what right? They wont ever win a CL.
Otamendi is 27 and had only one good season in his career. Paying what they did was a risk and so far it seems it backfired. £74M on those two players and thats still the area they need most investment inMangala was a mistake, Otamendi was not... With kompany out they do look fragile in the back but their offence is potent. With their ambition and money they will get it right soon enough. I wish I had that same faith in our board but sadly I don't.
Otamendi is 27 and had only one good season in his career. Paying what they did was a risk and so far it seems it backfired. £74M on those two players and thats still the area they need most investment in
Bloody city. Building a cracking attack/team. No idea why we don't try to match them with these targets. It's not as if we don't need sane, de Bruyne, Otamendi etc ourselves.
Porto, Chelsea, Liverpool, Inter. Never say never.Get what right? They wont ever win a CL.
Get what right? They wont ever win a CL.
Or pay almost as much for a mediocre Brazilian sitting on the bench. I wouldnt mind paying a lot for Sane like we did for MartialWell City can get fecked. They are building a real high potential team there. I hope we don't sit on our arses or keep running after some unrealistic targets.
Or pay almost as much for a mediocre Brazilian sitting on the bench. I wouldnt mind paying a lot for Sane like we did for Martial
I think that Felipe Anderson is not a great player. On the other hand, Sane is fantastic and one of the biggest talents. So why pay so much for Anderson (who sits on the bench at Lazio) and not go for Sane?this is exactly what people said when we bought martial. that we are buying a striker who hasnt scored much. Yet it seemed like our scouts knew what they were doing
I think that Felipe Anderson is not a great player. On the other hand, Sane is fantastic and one of the biggest talents. So why pay so much for Anderson (who sits on the bench at Lazio) and not go for Sane?
I think that Felipe Anderson is not a great player. On the other hand, Sane is fantastic and one of the biggest talents. So why pay so much for Anderson (who sits on the bench at Lazio) and not go for Sane?
Anderson I saw last season a couple of times. Sane I have not seen too many times but read a lot in the German magazines etc. As I said, I wouldnt buy AndersonYou are missing the point, how many games have you seen of both and how do you know about them?
Anderson I saw last season a couple of times. Sane I have not seen too many times but read a lot in the German magazines etc. As I said, I wouldnt buy Anderson