Monday's gotta be the deadline. No write-ups = Lose the team to someone / Bye
Monday's gotta be the deadline. No write-ups = Lose the team to someone / Bye
Annah wrote me, we should get as many games done as possible. I don't mind. Both NoPace and Pedro said they have time today, so why not? I hope we don't annoy all the other users when he have 3 fantasy game threads on the homepage all the timeDo we start the third game now or wait till tomorrow?
Annah wrote me, we should get as many games done as possible. I don't mind. Both NoPace and Pedro said they have time today, so why not? I hope we don't annoy all the other users when he have 3 fantasy game threads on the homepage all the time
Annah wrote me, we should get as many games done as possible. I don't mind. Both NoPace and Pedro said they have time today, so why not? I hope we don't annoy all the other users when he have 3 fantasy game threads on the homepage all the time
True, don't think there will be much activity in the MJJ vs Annah game, so we should be fine.
But now that the homepage is spread with tabs and all, it shouldn't be an issue. Plus this is an exception, we haven't gone more than two a day before so it should be okay.
We have delayed a bit so won't mind getting a third one going. With no offense to walkinhop/MJJ the that game seems a bit dead.
I was thinking that if we still have someone AWOL instead of finding a replacement why don't we have Chester play the guy whose opponent didn't show up? Main reason being anyone who takes over another team doesn't usually put that much effort and the games go a bit dead, so IMO it could be better having Chester take up that spot and we won't have the best loser thing anymore.@Stobzilla is the only left to submit a write up. it seems.
I was thinking that if we still have someone AWOL instead of finding a replacement why don't we have Chester play the guy whose opponent didn't show up? Main reason being anyone who takes over another team doesn't usually put that much effort and the games go a bit dead, so IMO it could be better having Chester take up that spot and we won't have the best loser thing anymore.
Edit l Scratch that.
@crappycraperson ? It's not like there's much discussion going on in the other two games.hey, can we start the next game right now? I still have a decent amount of time, but the later the worse. I dont know if it makes any difference for @NoPace anyway.
Yeah but we can always bring back the best loser scenario whenever we have an odd number of teams.I mentioned this a few days ago, then realised you would end up with 7 teams advancing
Play Chesterle vs Cutch and then have a best loser game for the last spot between both managers who lost their game through penalties.@Annahnomoss did @Stobzilla submit? If not we either need to give Cutch a bye or get some one promptish to take over. May be @antohan can do his theme justice
@Chesterlestreet - your game would probably be tomorrow at worst. So submit it to Annah as well
Play Chesterle vs Cutch and then have a best loser game for the last spot between both managers who lost their game through penalties.
True, Chesterle should also be allowed to veto that change. Cutch arguably has the best team and would be a way tougher draw than the best loser, Cutch would have to agree as well.I am fine with that but it is Annah's call. Only issue would be if Chester's game goes to pens as well
Play Chesterle vs Cutch and then have a best loser game for the last spot between both managers who lost their game through penalties.
Since Pippa vs trippy is going to penos too, maybe we can do both Chester vs one of the best losers and Cutch vs the other.
Nah that's too much luck again.If you guys would want it I would prefer a penalty shoot-out tournament between the current losers to decide it. Otherwise we will just have it between the two losers who went to penalties.