Rado_N
Yaaas Broncos!
He wouldn't. Spurs have already offered him a better contract than that: less money, but longer duration, meaning overall more money.
Not when a longer contract means more money overall.
you are pathological
He wouldn't. Spurs have already offered him a better contract than that: less money, but longer duration, meaning overall more money.
Not when a longer contract means more money overall.
Should a signed him last summerLinked with us again in the press this morning, I'll put it out there for just 25m he'd undoubtedly be my first choice CB to go for in the summer.
That’s not a better contract though. You know this.
Glaston got a pay rise at work. He was getting paid 30k a year working a 40 hour week. Now he's on 32k a year working a 55 hour week. It's a much better contract.4 years @150k per week (say) = £31.4m
2 years @ £200 per week = £21M
So yes, the longer contract is significantly better …. especially for a player who turns 31 next season.
Glaston got a pay rise at work. He was getting paid 30k a year working a 40 hour week. Now he's on 32k a year working a 55 hour week. It's a much better contract.
You know he can just sign another contract in 2 years time, right?
He'd have to work for longer for the same money though.That's a false analogy: Toby would not have to work more hours per week because of having a longer contract.
At his age, you can't bank on being able to sign another lucrative contract in 2 years from now - he could get badly injured or just see his performances fall off a cliff. If he has to choose between £150k per week for 4 years and £200k per week for just two years, it's obvious he'll take the longer contract.
Huh? Plenty of 33yo get big contracts everywhere, in fact, being a free agent could mean he gets a massive deal in China or Qatar if his aim is money at that time.That's a false analogy: Toby would not have to work more hours per week because of having a longer contract.
At his age, you can't bank on being able to sign another lucrative contract in 2 years from now - he could get badly injured or just see his performances fall off a cliff. If he has to choose between £150k per week for 4 years and £200k per week for just two years, it's obvious he'll take the longer contract.
Well, if anyone’s getting him, it’s going to be for 25 mil. It’s a release clause, not an estimate.If we can get him for the reported 25mil then this would be a no brainer.
Then we should get him. Instantly our most complete and experienced center back. His wages would probably be high, but give the low fee and our craptastic current options in this position, it would be worth it.Well, if anyone’s getting him, it’s going to be for 25 mil. It’s a release clause, not an estimate.
As an addition to the likes of DeLigt perhaps but as a stand-alone deal, no thanks
Apparently he wants to leave on a free so he can get a higher signing on bonus and bigger wages.Presumably he’ll want to celebrate his champions league win for a week or so but, when do we realistically think this one will be announced?
What’s the logic behind it? Either get 2 top center backs or stay with none? Well, with Lindelöf. I mean surely one is better than none?As an addition to the likes of DeLigt perhaps but as a stand-alone deal, no thanks
My logic is that I don’t think he’s that much better than what we have anymore. He’s not a leader, vertongin is.What’s the logic behind it? Either get 2 top center backs or stay with none? Well, with Lindelöf. I mean surely one is better than none?
As long as Ashley young and Phil Jones are still available we beggars cannot be choosers. He is very much welcome at this point.As an addition to the likes of DeLigt perhaps but as a stand-alone deal, no thanks
Jesus christ4 years @150k per week (say) = £31.4m
2 years @ £200 per week = £21M
So yes, the longer contract is significantly better …. especially for a player who turns 31 next season.
Do you think there are a lot of options out there? (genuine question, I'm struggling to see many options)My logic is that I don’t think he’s that much better than what we have anymore. He’s not a leader, vertongin is.
My fear is that if we buy TA then we’ve given up on other better targets
No one except the hugely overrated ManolasDo you think there are a lot of options out there? (genuine question, I'm struggling to see many options)
I'm thinking De Ligt and possibly Umtiti if De Ligt goes to Barcelona.
Bar those it seems like Skriniar and Koulibaly have signed new deals & Varane has stated that he wants to stay at Real.
Am I missing someone?
I’d genuinely go for Maguire before TA. If we couldn’t then I’d play TunazabeDo you think there are a lot of options out there? (genuine question, I'm struggling to see many options)
I'm thinking De Ligt and possibly Umtiti if De Ligt goes to Barcelona.
Bar those it seems like Skriniar and Koulibaly have signed new deals & Varane has stated that he wants to stay at Real.
Am I missing someone?
Maguire is fair, I forgot about him for a bit there.I’d genuinely go for Maguire before TA. If we couldn’t then I’d play Tunazabe
Umtitis knees are fooked btw
You, like me, seem to have forgotten about Maguire.No one except the hugely overrated Manolas
Do you think there are a lot of options out there? (genuine question, I'm struggling to see many options)
I'm thinking De Ligt and possibly Umtiti if De Ligt goes to Barcelona.
Bar those it seems like Skriniar and Koulibaly have signed new deals & Varane has stated that he wants to stay at Real.
Am I missing someone?
Truth be told, I've never heard of most of those those guys, I think I've heard of Konate and Schar only.Pezzella, Izzo, Schar, Konate, Maripan, Velazquez to name some others who are better defenders and much younger. Toby better on the ball than most of them.
Theres also a bunch who are more around Toby's age
I’d genuinely go for Maguire before TA. If we couldn’t then I’d play Tunazabe
Umtitis knees are fooked btw
Truth be told, I've never heard of most of those those guys, I think I've heard of Konate and Schar only.
A quick google suggest that they are more in the "might be good enough for the step up" in the case of Pezzella, Izzo, Schar, Maripan & Velazquez, and as such I'd rather we get Alderweireld for 25 million while we look for a more sure-thing for a longterm solution. On top of that Newcastle who have Schar is about to get filthy rich, so selling him if he is as good as you seem to think might not be possible. Konate seems to be a bit young for a prominent leader role, so unless he is a french De Ligt (thinking individual qualities but also leadership qualities) I think he wouldn't be what we need.
Not that I think it's impossible that some of those can be good alternatives, I just struggle to see how they can be on a high enough level to be clearly improving our defense in the way the more high-profile players might do.
Absolutely, Maguire it is. Someone who’s a leader, can defend, can head, can score and bring the ball out. There are already signs of decline in TA’s gameMaguire for 70 million or Toby for 25. I know which is the smarter option.
Maguire for 70 million or Toby for 25. I know which is the smarter option.
De Ligt is coming so we may not need him, unless we are going to be selling multiple central defenders.
The club doesn't really have time for them to come good in my opinion. We need someone to perform right out of the gate, if it's a older alternative then we need to make sure we follow every "might be good enough" alternative for a couple of years to make sure it's the right pick.They all have problems. So does Toby, but the difference is that Toby doesnt have time to come good if he doesnt do the job right away. Same reason Sanchez isnt working out
The other players have time to come good