GlastonSpur
Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2007
- Messages
- 17,716
- Supports
- Spurs
Tick tock ... 5 days left till Toby cannot be sold for just 25 million.
Tick tock ... 5 days left till Toby cannot be sold for just 25 million.
No one wants him.Tick tock ... 5 days left till Toby cannot be sold for just 25 million.
I don't think we're interested anymore, wasn't there strong links to Roma?
Tick tock ... 5 days left till Toby cannot be sold for just 25 million.
I don't think we're interested anymore, wasn't there strong links to Roma?
And one year till he leaves for free. £25m for one more season with Toby? Makes £80 mill for six with Maguire look cheap.
I'll be pretty surprised if he got triple what Toby is on, but £80m for Maguire is far from cheap IMO. If we do end up paying that much for Maguire, I think he'd come in on more like £200k a week.Does it? Have you figured in Maguire's wages to this? I'd guess they'd be something like triple Toby's current wage.
Does it? Have you figured in Maguire's wages to this? I'd guess they'd be something like triple Toby's current wage.
Still played in a final
Tick tock ... 5 days left till Toby cannot be sold for just 25 million.
Hm. That is a good point. At the same time, Maguire value is not likely to be 0 at 32 (in 6 years, he will be the same age as Jan Vertonghen). At a stretch, you could say it is 0 at 33.
£80 mill/7 years = £11,5 mill
He will probably receive a salary similar to Rashford at £200k per week. Making his salary approx £10,4 mill per year. In total per year he will then cost us £22 mill. Toby will cost you what? Somewhere between £28 mill and £30 mill? So Maguire is approx 25-35 % cheaper? I would say that is significant.
I doubt that, he's still a player with only 12 months left on his contract and you've just sold a RB with a lot longer on his contract plus who's a few years younger for 20m
I'd imagine anyone at any time during this window can pick up Alderweireld for 25m
I understand your point of him not wanting to come here due to us not having Champions League but why do you think we would pay him less than you. When we are known for paying stupid wages?Links, yes. No idea how strong they were. But I don't think he'd go there, to play in the EL and probably get less money than Spurs would pay him.
Is Maguire going to sign a 7 year contract? That's a lot longer than usual.
We only paid around £12m for Toby, so even he leaves for nothing next year Spurs have still gotten a bargain deal over the length of his contract ... when you amortise his fee over that time and then add in his low wages.
Anyhow, it's up to Toby what he chooses to do. I don't think Spurs will be too unhappy if he decides to just stay another year and then go.
I understand your point of him not wanting to come here due to us not having Champions League but why do you think we would pay him less than you. When we are known for paying stupid wages?
Thanks for clarifying.I don't mean less than what we are currently paying. I means less than what he's been offered by Spurs in a new contract - which is reported to be £130k per week. Would Roma be willing to pay more than that over a 4 year contract?
Probably 5+1. But will probably not leave for free either (it happens very rarely).
No doubt Spurs got a bargain deal when he signed. But that does not change my point. If you could sell him for £25 mill this year and he leaves for free next year the alternative cost of keeping him is close to £30 mill. And that is alot. Even compared to the Maguire-fee.
I understand where your logic went with this but it’s flawed because Alderweireld is a far superior player to Trippier. He’s worth more to us than 25mil...even if he then leaves on a free next season. So if no ones willing to pay the clause I can’t see us selling him.I doubt that, he's still a player with only 12 months left on his contract and you've just sold a RB with a lot longer on his contract plus who's a few years younger for 20m
I'd imagine anyone at any time during this window can pick up Alderweireld for 25m
Somewhat off topic, but the reason players like Ronaldo have pitched up in Italy and others like Pogba, Modric and Marcelo have been trying to get moves there is the tax exception for workers who haven’t been resident there for the previous 2 years. Essentially they get a 50% exemption (i.e. they’re only taxed on 50% of their salary), so it becomes much cheaper for a club to pay them a competitive salary, as they’re usually negotiated as net figures.I don't mean less than what we are currently paying. I means less than what he's been offered by Spurs in a new contract - which is reported to be £130k per week. Would Roma be willing to pay more than that over a 4 year contract?
I understand where your logic went with this but it’s flawed because Alderweireld is a far superior player to Trippier. He’s worth more to us than 25mil...even if he then leaves on a free next season. So if no ones willing to pay the clause I can’t see us selling him.
Which is the way I think it’s going to play out and I’m fine with it. Absolute top class CB - I’ll be very sad to see him go but can’t complain at all for what he’s done for the club and thankfully we’ve put some infrastructure in place to replace him when he leaves with players like Foyth and Sanchez.
Mostly I’m just surprised no one would pay 25 for him. Dortmund just payed over 30 for Hummels who looked done at times last season.
I understand where your logic went with this but it’s flawed because Alderweireld is a far superior player to Trippier. He’s worth more to us than 25mil...even if he then leaves on a free next season. So if no ones willing to pay the clause I can’t see us selling him.
Which is the way I think it’s going to play out and I’m fine with it. Absolute top class CB - I’ll be very sad to see him go but can’t complain at all for what he’s done for the club and thankfully we’ve put some infrastructure in place to replace him when he leaves with players like Foyth and Sanchez.
Mostly I’m just surprised no one would pay 25 for him. Dortmund just payed over 30 for Hummels who looked done at times last season.
Unless you really do think Trippier is worth more than Alderweireld then yes the logic is flawed.Firstly my logic isn't flawed simply because you disagree with it
Secondly even if Alderweireld is far superior to Trippier how's he worth more to Spurs when you already have his replacement at the club in Sanchez and or Foyth? Whereas you sell Trippier your first choice RB and now only have an equally as average player as your only remaining specialist in that position. I'd argue Spurs could afford to loose a CB given the depth they had in that position whereas RB needed improving not weakening
I'd argue players with contracts running out usually ARE at their best because they want to show off and make that last big pay day.It's poor for Spurs if they can't find anyone to pick up Alderweireld - players with their mind on new clubs or with contracts running out aren't typically the most committed or performing at their best
It's poor for Spurs if they can't find anyone to pick up Alderweireld - players with their mind on new clubs or with contracts running out aren't typically the most committed or performing at their best
Probably because his agent is likely touting him for £200k a week plus. He’s after his pension fund with one last move.It's poor for Spurs if they can't find anyone to pick up Alderweireld - players with their mind on new clubs or with contracts running out aren't typically the most committed or performing at their best
suppose it depends on character - theres also politics involved as I'm sure Ole played McTominay and Fred ahead of a fit Herrera at the closing stages of last seasonI'd argue players with contracts running out usually ARE at their best because they want to show off and make that last big pay day.
Bit of a misconception IMO, they aren't actively looking to sell him at all. It's just a clause in his contract that can be activated by a buyer.It's poor for Spurs if they can't find anyone to pick up Alderweireld - players with their mind on new clubs or with contracts running out aren't typically the most committed or performing at their best
I'd rather keep him. I have essentially 0 concerns over his quality or character.suppose it depends on character - theres also politics involved as I'm sure Ole played McTominay and Fred ahead of a fit Herrera at the closing stages of last season
Herrera was decent enough until March
Mata really poor,
Jones guff,
De Gea with the uncertainty was awful
Ramsey was decent enough in periods
Rabiot was dropped/unused
Sturridge little impact
Carroll/Welbeck - suppose injuries make a difference
either way....if a player isnt committed and you are going to lose an asset in the short term it makes sense for me to sell
You should do. Don’t understand why you don’t make him a decent offer. 2 year contract, double the money, job done. Everyone knows what he’s after.I'd rather keep him. I have essentially 0 concerns over his quality or character.
25mil or under is chump change in today's market. I'd rather have a world class CB even if it's just for a year.
You should do. Don’t understand why you don’t make him a decent offer. 2 year contract, double the money, job done. Everyone knows what he’s after.
Perhaps his suitor pulled out at the last mo due to another player becoming available. If I was a fan of yours, which obviously i’m not, I would be disappointed to lose him.Story is he was offered £140k or something, he agreed to this then didn’t sign, no idea how true it is but her would most certainly have been offered £140-£150k over probably 2 years.