Brophs
The One and Only
Wonder if we can throw Moyesy's daughter into the deal?
I'm not fussed on Vermaelen, he'll probably do alright, but Lescott is a stretch. He's always been shite.Joleon Lescott was a better CB than Vermaelen, he's available for free
A massive boner?Evans had one great season three seasons ago but has more meh than solid since then. Blame it on injuries if you like but even he's been fit he's always good for at least massive boner every game. But once he sorts himself out he'll be very good.
Vermaelen would give us a bit if depth we could use.
We don't need him or we don't need a defender?Havent been reading about transfer for a while. And then I see we're buying this guy?
Is that for real?
I mean we dont need him and he's not very good either.
We don't need him or we don't need a defender?
He'd be a risk at roughly £10m? Is that assuming hes not the only defender to come in? Why would be be a risk? Because he's not injured anymore or because he plays for Arsenal?Maybe we should buy a defender but buying him would be a risk. If we're buying a CB we should go for someone like Hummels surely.
He'd be a risk at roughly £10m? Is that assuming hes not the only defender to come in? Why would be be a risk? Because he's not injured anymore or because he plays for Arsenal?
Jeez, that Woody's tougher than I thought...
He's actually not that bad. He's also fit right now. The purpose is to buy a defender. Which other defender will come available? Which defender is realistic? Its not even strange. Hed be a squad player, at cheap price, with BPL experience.Risk is he's not very good anymore ( he was solid when he came to Arsenal ) and he's injured a lot. I dont see a purpose of this buy. If some other defender will come in all right but its just a strange deal as I said.
Its quite funny watching people try and convince themselves that this would be a good signing. You've got Arsenal fans saying he's not good enough to be anything then a backup, you've got Belgium fans saying he's crap. But oh no, United fans know best.
If we do sign him, then that really is conformation of where we now stand as a club, and how far we've fallen.
@KM don't you know we need a team full of superstars?
Such a cringeworthy post this is.
@KM don't you know we need a team full of superstars?
Well that's the point isn't it. He might be backup to the lads. Everyone is thinking he's a replacement for Vidic or Rio.We have no Europe next year so why not give Jones a year of domestic football as first choice. Vermaelen would be ideal to bring in as a rotation/back-up centre-back with PL experience and as a safety net in case Jones struggles when given the nod for a season.
The bit at the end might be but the point still stands - Vermaelen just isn't good enough so it's daft for us to pretend otherwise.
Such a cringeworthy post this is.
Well that's the point isn't it. He might be backup to the lads. Everyone is thinking he's a replacement for Vidic or Rio.
The bit at the end might be but the point still stands - Vermaelen just isn't good enough so it's daft for us to pretend otherwise.
Exactly. Makes sense to me.Back-up is what I assumed. Jones steps up with Evans and he becomes the experienced back-up with Smalling. If Jones fulfils potential then we might not need to spunk £40m on a Rio/Vidic replacement. We may have to next summer if it doesn't work out with him, but with no CL this year why not hold fire to see. Could save a pretty penny if it works out.
The bit at the end might be but the point still stands - Vermaelen just isn't good enough so it's daft for us to pretend otherwise.
Arsenal fan at work said he's a good player but since he got a bad injury he hasn't quite been the same.
Wonder if we can throw Moyesy's daughter into the deal?
Yeah, no worries, you gash-shy ring-tickler.Please cut the sick childish comments
I'm not fussed on Vermaelen, he'll probably do alright, but Lescott is a stretch. He's always been shite.
Not good enough for United full stop. At times we sign young players that might not be a high enough level but have a good chance of being that in the future. Other times we sign more experienced heads to add quality to the squad.Good enough for what? The club? Backup defender? Replacement for Rio or Vidic?
What isn't he good enough for and why? Compare and contrast with what we currently have.
Homework question
If we're offering him £100k p/w (absurd wage) as one of the reports said, he certainly won't be back-up.
Simply not true. There is a weird tendency to trash all our unfashionable players as being hopeless because we have seen their mistakes and their habits and we know the well, whereas we always consider other teams' players to be superior because we see their highlights every week but don't study them in as much detail as our own.Fit and firing Vermaelen is twice as good as anything we've currently got.
What City pay and the going rate are not really the same thing.That's pretty much the going rate these days. Sagna got 100k a week to go and cover Zabaleta from time to time.
He's dog dirt. Always has been. The fee City paid for him was laughable.Course not. Was very solid next to Kompany when they won the league.
Although right footed, we already have someone more than capable of playing that role in Evans, who is almost as comfortable with his left foot as with his right.He's not coming as back up. Why the hell would he swap sitting on the bench at Arsenal for sitting on the bench at United? And why the hell would we spend 100k a week on someone we're not planning on picking ahead of Smalling, Evans and Jones? Plus lets not forget that LVG apparently wants a ball playing left sided CB in our first team. That would be Vermaelen, no?
If he ends up as a rotation option it'll be because he wasn't able to step up to the role we have earmarked for him. No mistake, if we sign him it's with the intention of making him a first team player.
Maybe but with new rumors about Arsenal being interested in Smalling, maybe we will be bringing in 2 CBsWould it be safe to say if we get him, none of the high-profile defenders we've been linked with are coming?