Withnail
Full Member
She turned the wee’uns against him
She turned the wee’uns against him
Unsure if he will want them in Jan. They’ll probably be in the Europa by then.Ornstein has a piece on it and this. It seems that the owner doesn't like it when he doesn't get his own way. This will be a disaster for CFC in footballing terms, and you can see them coming in for Ronaldo again in January.
https://www.londonworld.com/sport/f...-lukaku-thomas-tuchel-chelsea-sacking-3834620
The thing is it's worth sticking just that extra bit longer with a manager as proven as Tuchel. He might be able to turn it around.By all accounts the rock set in on the pre season tour to the states. You could sense that there were tensions and a lot of head scratching from the players as early as the Everton game.
You can argue it’s too early and yep that view point has merits but you can also argue that if it was going to happen this was the best time in that no other major club is looking for a manager but also the new owner clearly isn’t going to just let things be run in the same way.
Potter would be an obvious choice in view of the new owners views on the academy etc
A good read about what went wrong.
https://www.londonworld.com/sport/f...-lukaku-thomas-tuchel-chelsea-sacking-3834620
Since taking over from Roman Abramovich, Boehly has been hands-on involved in everything that is happening at Chelsea.
He is literally the last person to leave Stamford Bridge after every home game and makes sure he goes into the dressing room to speak to players after games to see if they are getting on with the manager.
The only sacking Roman made that was truly knee-jerk was Ancelotti. All the other sackings turned out to be the correct decisions.Different owner but the same knee-jerk sacking of the manager
I've seen a lot of my Chelsea supporting friends/colleagues be pissed at this decision.
However, if you look at the results since mid of last season, Chelsea have hardly looked like a team looking to achieve great things. I believe his record in the last 25 games was worse than the record Lampard had in his last 25 when he was sacked. Most of your underlyings, I believe, have been trending downwards. Add to that, your defenders are basically your goalscorers, or in other words, the tactics going forward don't seem to be sustainable.
Of course, the transfer window seemed like a mess where it looked like Boehly was acting like a 5 year old kid in candy shop, but if you remove emotion out of all of it, it's not the most unreasonable decision, certainly not something I'd not expect from Chelsea
Why? That's just the nature of a football manager's job. You work a few years, get sacked, and move on to the next gig.He won't last. I cannot fathom apart from money, why any self respecting manager would even bother taking the Chelsea gig. No matter what, they will be sacked eventually.
There were reports that he made his final decision after a talk with Rangnick, yes. But I don't think that means that he was truly on board before that, to me it sounded more like he did his due diligence by talking to a trusted advisor who worked with Ronaldo before.Wasn’t Tuchel on board with signing Ronaldo but was talked out of it by Rangnick?
Trouble causer. Asking the players their opinions behind the coaches back and this causes distrust and a toxic mentality.What a meddling cvnt
I remember when I was bantering with Arsenal fans about Lampard being the better of the two. Arteta not only outlasted Lampard but his successor too. We’re just two very different clubs run in very different ways.
Perceptions. Even when Arsenal were doing atrociously, Arteta somehow gave off this notion to a lot of the media [and the Arsenal fanbase] to "Trust the Process".
What I don't get is why is Arteta still praised after 3 years of complete mediocrity, whilst we were mocked under Mourinho when he finished 2nd whilst winning Europa League and Carabao cup in the same season. Sure, he had his usual meltdown and deserved to get sacked but it's insane to me that he was seen by many as a failure at united whilst arteta with a bunch of 5th, 6th place finishes and a fecking fa in 3 years cup gets a pass.
But seriously, what is it about Arteta that lets him get away with murder? Those kind of results and finishes over 3 seasons at any other top 6 club and you'd be a laughing stock.
How do you know there aren't such clauses? But maybe most players just go for a general release clause to be safe against any circumstances?Probably a topic for a sperate thread but i do wonder why players dont have clauses in their contracts allowng them to leave if the manager gets sacked. Example aubumeyang, came to chelsea because of tuchel and now hes gone. Less than few days after he signed for the club.
Im sure ive heard of it in NFL, that if the head coach is sacked, some players ask for a clause that then allows them to go free agency at the end of the season.
As much as Chelsea harp on about the signings being chosen by the club and not tuchel. They have hamstrung the next manager with a reduced budget and players he potentially doesnt want.
I'm not sure Potter would take it, he turned down Spurs becuae apparently he didnt like the set up, he's always said his teams thrives in a settled environment, that's not Chelsea.
There were reports that he made his final decision after a talk with Rangnick, yes. But I don't think that means that he was truly on board before that, to me it sounded more like he did his due diligence by talking to a trusted advisor who worked with Ronaldo before.
To me it seems like disagreement with his boss ended his Chelsea career more than falling out with players. From a result or sport perspective it was definitely to early to fire him. Boehly just waited for an opportunity to get rid of him of personal reasons.His main problem seems to be that he isn't a good man manager, he always seems to lose the dressing room after a couple of seasons, falling out with his players and often enough the higher ups as well.
Social media land saying players not posted any “thanks” messages apart from Fofana putting a pic of Tuchel upWhat a meddling cvnt
Chelsea are so screwed.
Tuchel had difficulties with Dortmund top management, he had difficulties with PSG top management, despite taking them to a CL final, and he’s had difficulties with Chelsea owners now.
I think he’s a damn fine tactician, excellent at organizing a side, but he’s the new Conte, isn’t he? He only sees his player’s faults, not their strengths, and those faults become more pronounced in his mind, the longer he spends with them.
That is absolutely nothing to do with the post you quoted, to be fair.Utter rubbish that, the form of so many players under him compared to under Lampard was massively different. Someone like Rudiger played his best football under Tuchel
That is absolutely nothing to do with the post you quoted, to be fair.
How has he been sacked but Arteta managed to survive the last two seasons?
They said that in Tuchel’s head his players are never good enough and it gets worse as time passes. Something we’ve seen in numerous jobs in numerous countries.How is it? Not seeing someone like Rudigers strengths? Literally the first thing he did was move to a back 5 after Lampard playing a back 4
They said that in Tuchel’s head his players are never good enough and it gets worse as time passes. Something we’ve seen in numerous jobs in numerous countries.
The comparison was even made with Conte, who despite being very good and getting tunes out of many players, never feels it’s enough.
Wow. So if Potter has a £16M buy out and does join, that change of management would cost £30M!
He may have a perfectionist mentality, and this doesn't translate well to others - especially nowadays.They said that in Tuchel’s head his players are never good enough and it gets worse as time passes. Something we’ve seen in numerous jobs in numerous countries.
The comparison was even made with Conte, who despite being very good and getting tunes out of many players, never feels it’s enough.
He has a 60% win rate as Chelsea manager. Potter (who I do rate) has just over 30% at Brighton. Not sure he's ready to make that step up to what managing Chelsea requires.
I feel like Chelsea's ownership has made a big mistake here.
Not necessarily. Very much depends on how the manager handles big names and sets up the side.It's almost like it's easier to get a higher win ratio at a giant with unlimited funds, than a relative minnow club
Interesting if true. The real crime I think was Tuchel saying 'distroy'.
Isn't this just rumours? Because it is even more stupid by them if that was true. Let managers be managers.Todd Boehly wanted CR7. He'd as good as done the deal with Mendes. He was intoxicated by the thought of new revenue streams, the social media clicks, the glamour, the shared legacy of association with greatness...
Tuchel was fundamentally opposed to bringing Ronaldo into his dressing room. The footballing side of the club backed TT. Boehly didn't like the power that the manager wielded at his newly purchased club. He waited for TT to under perform and sacked him after the first hiccup.
Boehly has messed up massively. They will not find a better coach. Not to mention a squad assembled to fit into TT's system.
It’s nothing to do with nowadays, he’s simply incapable of seeing the wood for the trees.He may have a perfectionist mentality, and this doesn't translate well to others - especially nowadays.