SalfordRed18
Netflix and avocado, no chill
You can tell hea genuinely a good person.
Hope he finishes his story.
yeah Reigns looked like one of the Usos next to himIs the Rock working through a list of making everyone in the company look weak?
I thought he made Reigns look like a weak little brother he had to stand up for here, then he makes Triple H look weak backstage.
However... I'm going to propose a double double cross. Rock doing this to ingratiate himself with the Bloodline, then double crosses them to prevent interference in the title match and let Cody get the win.
Why would you go through all that trouble just to land in the exact same spot you were in immediately after the rumble?The #CodyCryBabies really got themselves worked up for nothing didn't they.
Yet, I'm looking forward to hearing how this change was due to the 'negative reaction'...... ok.
This is going to be one of the biggest matches of all time, with Rock involved too and going into it on Roman's side, but I suspect it'll end with a Rock turn and Cody winning.
It was really good sports entertainment.
It's so clearly a work though. The WWE are out there handing Cody signs out and stirring up the narrative that Cody's been hard done by and the fans lapped it up, when mere days before they were hyped about Rock vs Reigns. It's quite easy to nudge fans in a certain direction to be fair.Why would you go through all that trouble just to land in the exact same spot you were in immediately after the rumble?
The fans who'll claim they knew it was always a work despite it clearly not are going to be detestable.
The #CodyCryBabies really got themselves worked up for nothing didn't they.
Yet, I'm looking forward to hearing how this change was due to the 'negative reaction'...... ok.
This is going to be one of the biggest matches of all time, with Rock involved too and going into it on Roman's side, but I suspect it'll end with a Rock turn and Cody winning.
It was really good sports entertainment.
Which was done ONLY after the negative reaction to the thought of Rock/Reigns. WWE pay massive attention to their online reactions/fans etc. I think with the Tko/Netflix deal, WWE for a few months had been considering making Rock/Reigns the main match. Punks injury gave them the opportunity to rubber stamp it and then they could move Cody towards Rollins (why else would Rollins have said Cody should challenge him) again that statement was met with a very negative reaction.It's so clearly a work though. The WWE are out there handing Cody signs out and stirring up the narrative that Cody's been hard done by and the fans lapped it up, when mere days before they were hyped about Rock vs Reigns. It's quite easy to nudge fans in a certain direction to be fair.
There wasn't that much of a negative reaction at that moment. The Rock vs Reigns hint at Rocks return had a huge huge huge pop. Cody winning the RR had a huge pop. it could have been nudged away from heat or nudged toward heat by the WWE, and they chose the latter. Cody was never feuding with Reigns for a prolonged period, he doesn't have any history with him outside of losing at Mania. He was beefing with other stars along the way in his narrative, and his "story" could have been fulfilled with a match up vs Rollins if they wanted to nudge the angle toward that.Which was done ONLY after the negative reaction to the thought of Rock/Reigns. WWE pay massive attention to their online reactions/fans etc. I think with the Tko/Netflix deal, WWE for a few months had been considering making Rock/Reigns the main match. Punks injury gave them the opportunity to rubber stamp it and then they could move Cody towards Rollins (why else would Rollins have said Cody should challenge him) again that statement was met with a very negative reaction.
For those who think this was all a work:
They’ve somehow worked themselves into a shoot where there would be more interest in Cody vs The Rock, than Roman vs The Rock.
The fans were so hyped that they had to delete and reupload the rock and reigns stare down (less than a week ago), because it was what I imagine their most disliked video of all time?It's so clearly a work though. The WWE are out there handing Cody signs out and stirring up the narrative that Cody's been hard done by and the fans lapped it up, when mere days before they were hyped about Rock vs Reigns. It's quite easy to nudge fans in a certain direction to be fair.
Yeah, you basically run back the WM20 storyline. Benoit is Rhodes, Roman is HHH and Rock is Michaels. It is the exact same dynamic, more or less. Have Cody pin Roman, then do Roman vs Rock again in the future.I suppose this is good if they make it a triple threat.
If they wanted the impact of this match, it’s a year or 2 too late. It was the perfect end game for the bloodline story but it just dragged too long.
And which video was that? It was after WWE had already made their angle of Cody being hard done by.The fans were so hyped that they had to delete and reupload the rock and reigns stare down (less than a week ago), because it was what I imagine their most disliked video of all time?
The rock turning up surprisingly at a live show is always going to get a massive pop and everything he says will be greeted with a pop. Fact is online it was a different story and again WWE pay massive attention to their online content.There wasn't that much of a negative reaction at that moment. The Rock vs Reigns hint at Rocks return had a huge huge huge pop. Cody winning the RR had a huge pop. it could have been nudged away from heat or nudged toward heat by the WWE, and they chose the latter. Cody was never feuding with Reigns for a prolonged period, he doesn't have any history with him outside of losing at Mania. He was beefing with other stars along the way in his narrative, and his "story" could have been fulfilled with a match up vs Rollins if they wanted to nudge the angle toward that.
They chose not to, handed out Cody signs at key moments and built up a picture of him being hard done by from The Rock, and the fans lapped it up. They're basically grass-fed what to think it seems.
The video that got a lot of dislikes was after the narrative was set and seeds planted of Cody being hard done by though.The rock turning up surprisingly at a live show is always going to get a massive pop and everything he says will be greeted with a pop. Fact is online it was a different story and again WWE pay massive attention to their online content.
I mean Rock/Reigns has been teased for years by both wrestlers. The only thing preventing it happening previously was The Rock had commitments. So are we really suggesting that when finally the rock gives the go ahead for the match to happen WWE then decide they don’t actually want the match….Or is it that their hands were forced as the clamour for the match simply isn’t there as much through the entire wwe fanbase?
The reason Cody was kept from Roman so long was because they wanted to keep the rivalry fresh for this Mania. We’ve seen Rollins/Rhodes multiple times. The WWE simply won’t go into a Wrestlemania with two world title matches the majority of fans don’t really want to see and so they’ve changed tact. It is the most logical conclusion to come to.
Not sure they’ll have another short heel run for the Rock and it kind of cheapens Cody’s win if he needs help.I said they'd pivot to this the other day. Was very obvious. And The Rock will turn on Roman in the main event to help Cody win. Also very obvious.
It's not David Lynch here guys.
Not sure they’ll have another short heel run for the Rock and it kind of cheapens Cody’s win if he needs help.
For me they use Rock to turn Roman face. Have their match at SS or Saudi
I mean, if that happens (even if its obvious), it would be great to see. And a top ending to the family story angle.I said they'd pivot to this the other day. Was very obvious. And The Rock will turn on Roman in the main event to help Cody win. Also very obvious.
It's not David Lynch here guys.
You're rewriting history from literally a week ago.And which video was that? It was after WWE had already made their angle of Cody being hard done by.
For those who think this was all a work:
They’ve somehow worked themselves into a shoot where there would be more interest in Cody vs The Rock, than Roman vs The Rock.
Hmm, I think you’re obsessing over this video a bit and you seem to have your timeframe mixed up. Not great when this is what you’re basing your argument off.The video that got a lot of dislikes was after the narrative was set and seeds planted of Cody being hard done by though.
Cody has had no real feud with Reigns for what, a year? He's had no beef with anyone in fact that's been prolonged, and his "story" is workable with Rollins. The injury to Rollins (And Punk) led to a clear pivot by the WWE and the fans lapped it up. They were doing this for a while - what video specifically was the disliked one? I forget. Is it the one where Cody came out and bowed out from fighting Reigns? If so come on mate, the writers already did their bit to nudge it toward heat by then.
I agree and that’ll help Roman turn face. I think Roman loses v Rock and Roman gets kicked out for disgracing the Bloodline soon after which allows him to take more time off and come back as a monster face.Less help but more balancing out the interference from the bloodline. They could do it by having them desert Roman and recognise The Rock as the "head of the table".
I mean, if that happens (even if its obvious), it would be great to see. And a top ending to the family story angle.
Exactly my point. That video set the narrative and the fans lapped it up by suddenly disliking the Rock on youtube. The WWE set the angle, the fans are grassfed it. If the WWE did something totally different with Cody squaring off to Rollins and The Rock making a face promo to stop Reigns chatting shite to the crowd, guess what, it's a different angle and the video is loved.You're rewriting history from literally a week ago.
No narrative of Cody being hard done by was set at that point. It was posted after Cody "gave away" his spot to the rock for WrestleMania, the rock hugged Cody and had a stare down with Roman Reigns.
Where was the narrative of Cody being hard done by at that point?
Eh? I'm not the one who even brought up the video in the first place.Hmm, I think you’re obsessing over this video a bit and you seem to have your timeframe mixed up. Not great when this is what you’re basing your argument off.
I think you should just look at it from a common sense standpoint.
Do you think if the Rock told WWE at any point recently I wanna do a match with Reigns at Wrestlemania they would say no? Especially after one of the people pencilled in for one of the mania main events got injured?
Their eyes lit up when Punk got injured. They then tested the waters for Rollins/Rhodes, that was rejected. Coupled with the negative Rock/Reigns reaction they’ve changed tact. They literally did the same thing ten years ago. They even went as far as given out t shirt and signs for Daniel Bryan at the time but again only after they’d read the room.
After listening to a lot of Something to Wrestle, they seem to plan Wrestlemania a year in advance, and the Punk injury really f'ed them. They probably had a few backup plans in place, and went with Rock/Reigns as their primary choice. However, when they saw the reaction, they were happy to pivot as the Rock/Reigns angle was not first choice if Punk wasn't injured. The podcast makes it clear that sometimes you go with what the fans one when it's so hot, and I think this is one of those times.Hmm, I think you’re obsessing over this video a bit and you seem to have your timeframe mixed up. Not great when this is what you’re basing your argument off.
I think you should just look at it from a common sense standpoint.
Do you think if the Rock told WWE at any point recently I wanna do a match with Reigns at Wrestlemania they would say no? Especially after one of the people pencilled in for one of the mania main events got injured?
Their eyes lit up when Punk got injured. They then tested the waters for Rollins/Rhodes, that was rejected. Coupled with the negative Rock/Reigns reaction they’ve changed tact. They literally did the same thing ten years ago. They even went as far as given out t shirt and signs for Daniel Bryan at the time but again only after they’d read the room.
How you getting the conclusion it's all the work and the wwe set the narrative from fans choosing to dislike that video? They deleted the video because of the backlash. The dislikes clearly weren't on purpose, and they've sinced pivoted away from that angle.Exactly my point. That video set the narrative and the fans lapped it up by suddenly disliking the Rock on youtube. The WWE set the angle, the fans are grassfed it. If the WWE did something totally different with Cody squaring off to Rollins and The Rock making a face promo to stop Reigns chatting shite to the crowd, guess what, it's a different angle and the video is loved.
Eh? I'm not the one who even brought up the video in the first place.
It wasn't always the plan, because the injuries created a need to pivot. My question is how you think this isn't also a work? They were cody signs out to the crowd for fecksakeHow you getting the conclusion it's all the work and the wwe set the narrative from fans choosing to dislike that video? They deleted the video because of the backlash. The dislikes clearly weren't on purpose, and they've sinced pivoted away from that angle.
It's pretty bloody obvious this wasn't always the plan.
Yea, those signs were after the backlash. You've got your timeline all mixed up. The fans were never hyped for Rock/Roman as you put.It wasn't always the plan, because the injuries created a need to pivot. My question is how you think this isn't also a work? They were cody signs out to the crowd for fecksake