Nah this is fair. I've been in the bubble of watching so I mostly know what is happening and why. But even as a watcher, I don't know why that three on three happened except Tony khan said it would on a dynamite.
I don't know why buddy Matthews and andrade fought.
They didn't say where andrade and Miro have been all this time.
On a side note, Tony khan and aew have this issue of following up on momentum.
Starks, wardlow, Hobbs, even swerve. It's a shame
This is very true. Hook's another one that felt like he was going to be a sensation. He felt fresh and different, albeit super raw. I think the Danhausen stuff killed him and now he's just a generic guy. He's lost the edge he had.
I really enjoy all 4 you mentioned, though all are perhaps missing the final puzzle piece to be a really top guy. The booking has been disappointing though. I think the roster is just so vast and Tony gets distracted if things aren't being pushed in front of his face by Meltzer/the IWC.
There's actually a lot I think AEW does get right but they don't always maximise the presentation of their talent. Take Jay White for instance. He was brought in doing a random beat down and treated like an also ran. If he'd have signed for WWE, I'd expect them to do some crazy entrance or superb vignettes or big hype. Same with Okada in his brief appearances so far. He doesn't feel like a big guy. I'm not into NJPW at all but even I know that the guy is an absolute superstar. He's crazily charismatic and his whole shtick is based on flashiness and colours. He came to AEW looking like a bloke they'd found off the street. I don't get it at all.
I have to say that I agree with you here.
I'm a lapsed fan who actively sought and watched his first wrestling show (excluding Manias and Royal Rumbles) in 20 years on Sunday morning due to the fact I've been reading about the fall out with CM Punk/Elite on sites like reddit and here.
I watched the first couple of segments and enjoyed ( but didn't love) the Punk promo, thought Wardlow and Luchasauras (Good look, terrible name IMO sounds like a brodus clay character) was decent and harkened back to WWF/WCW big man style wrestling with some extra flair, Andrade match was good too (even if I don't really understand the scary guys) while I found the Miro match just "Meh" and then I just kind of drifted off and haven't been back since.
As you mentioned before a little more storytelling would have helped me along my journey to becoming a regular viewer but i think your description of it as "dull and uninviting" is pretty much on the money.
If it wasn't for all the drama I wouldn't have checked it out (I don't watch Dynamite or Rampage) and I think they missed an opportunity to hook some people like me while they had those eyes on the product.
See, this is funny to me. Rightfully, you're brought back by the controversy around Punk and the Elite. Although I have my doubts, I'm pretty sure that's 100% a shoot and that there's still real bad feelings on both sides. I get that Tony Khan doesn't want to inflame the situation too much but damn, there's one hell of an elephant in the room. Could they not all sit round a table and make money off this? It feels like they've brought back Punk in the most boring way possible when he should be absolutely on fire. Now he's in the Owen Hart tournament and apparently is feuding with Samoa Joe for no real stated reason at all. I don't get how they can make this guy feel inert already when he had so much attention and controversy surrounding him, such that it brought someone like yourself back to give it a chance.
I have seen AEW do some fantastic storytelling at times so that's what makes this even more disappointing. I remember episodes of Raw/SD/Nitro in late 90s/early 2000s - there'd be plots weaved throughout the show, ok to good matches, vignettes with substance beyond 'I'm entering the tournament', people plotting and forming alliances, mystery attackers, romance angles, wrestlers throwing others in rivers, people fighting in a supermarket, swerves, segments off-site like in a wrestler's house or at a beach party or something, etc. Some of it was absolute garbage, granted, but there was always a lot of effort put into telling stories. Everyone had motivations and characters beyond 'good wrestler'. There was a feeling of pace and unpredictability. Some TV matches were very good (especially early 2000s WWE with the SmackDown Six, for instance) but mostly they didn't try to kill themselves with insane stunts and left the more intense spots for PPV.
To my taste, a wrestling TV show should be 60-40 ratio of wrestling to segments and the PPV should be 85-15. Build to big matches, give talent a rest, make everyone concentrate on getting their characters and stories over.