Nighteyes
Another Muppet
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
- Messages
- 25,467
I agree. Can you imagine Ronaldo and Thiago in the same team
May I be spared rotten tomatoes being thrown at me if I submitted a crazy idea?
Since it's really hard to imagine Barcelona selling us a potential superstar -- Thiago Alcantara -- would we even consider the idea of suggesting to Barca a loan spell for the Spaniard?
Unless, of course, we can come up with another equally outstanding central midfielder, a loan for Alcantara could serve both clubs' interests quite beautifully. Yes, there are other decent midfielders out there who are gettable, but are Fellaini or Cabaye (I really do like Cabaye, though) are nowhere near Alcanatara's quality. Fabregas is up there, but does anyone really believe we're going to land him? I don't see Gundogan going anywhere. We're not going to snatch Wilshere from Wenger. I don't see Real selling Modric to us -- but Modric would be an outstanding acquisition for us. We might pick up Strootman but if we do he wouldn't give us what Alcantara offers. There's been a lot of chatter about James McCarthy over the last week but I trust we all agree James McCarthy is no Thiago Alcantara.
Where I'm going with this if that we can't actually buy a proper midfielder, why not borrow him for a season? I'm not ready to give up on Tom Cleverley quite yet and who knows what the youth pipeline might produce. And what if Alcantara actually warms up to the idea of being a United man after a season? Maybe he'll survey the situation at Barcelona next summer and decide his long term future is at Manchester. And if he decides to go back, then how much worse off are we than where are right now?
If we can buy the boy, let's buy the boy. But unless we can land a mid of the quality of, say, Modric, why not a loan deal for Alcantara?
I agree. Can you imagine Ronaldo and Thiago in the same team
Have you not been paying attention? IF we trigger the release clause AND Thiago wants to come here, Barcelona have no choice in the matter.
Ruud: what you said is silly on so many levels.
Firstly, we're not a feeder club who borrows young talents, we're not going to waste a year developing a potential superstar to make him better for a European rival.
Secondly, he has a release clause of £15m or thereabouts.
Thirdly, you used to be better than this in the newbies, why have you got the reputation that you do now?
Ruud, I really don't know what the hell you are on mate...
Perhaps we should loan in Ruud into our purchasing department... that's what we are lacking... our very own 'ideas commitee'
That video of Thiago smiling and walking away reminds me of the one with Sneijder being all coy about United back in 2011. Coy bastards.
That video of Thiago smiling and walking away reminds me of the one with Sneijder being all coy about United back in 2011. Coy bastards.
Precisely. Sneijder deal was close. Lucas deal was close but PSG came in at the last minute. Thiago deal could be close but Bayern could do a PSGReminds me of Lucas last summer...
Can't see Bayern signing him. His issue is a lack of playing time and perhaps the only other club in the world where he would face similar competition to Barca is Bayern.Precisely. Sneijder deal was close. Lucas deal was close but PSG came in at the last minute. Thiago deal could be close but Bayern could do a PSG
Can't see Bayern signing him. His issue is a lack of playing time and perhaps the only other club in the world where he would face similar competition to Barca is Bayern.
How could it mean nothing? It may seem that way because we didn't agree a deal in the end but in terms of stating intent, I think it certainly means something. People reference Lucas & Hazard as examples of Sir Alex trying to improve our flanks. Based on how our wingers performed this season, perhaps he saw a potential issue and the need for improvement before the season even started. If we were never in for these lads, then we'd have to settle with the fact Sir Alex wasn't looking at improving the quality of our wingers. Therefore, I do think it means something.Close as we all know means nothing, I bring up the case of a certain M Essien....
I agree. Can you imagine Ronaldo and Thiago in the same team
How could it mean nothing? It may seem that way because we didn't agree a deal in the end but in terms of stating intent, I think it certainly means something. People reference Lucas & Hazard as examples of Sir Alex trying to improve our flanks. Based on how our wingers performed this season, perhaps he saw a potential issue and the need for improvement before the season even started. If we were never in for these lads, then we'd have to settle with the fact Sir Alex wasn't looking at improving the quality of our wingers. Therefore, I do think it means something.
Close, as well know means nothing
The interpretation of your statement was a bit vague which is why I took liberty in responding in the way I did. I figured what I am quoting now is what you meant but I didn't know for sure.You are quite the philosophical poster, I just wish sometimes you would read what is in front of you rather than trying to take a clever explanative view.
Means, that you may have one foot in the door, but unless your sitting down inside the house, you ain't in. Does it mean nothing? No obviously not, it does mean something, but my point was is that you can get to the closest possible point and it can still amount to nothing, for me I don't see this happening, but part of this is due to the fact I would like it
No. I genuinely can't imagine Ronaldo joining Barcelona.
The interpretation of your statement was a bit vague which is why I took liberty in responding in the way I did. I figured what I am quoting now is what you meant but I didn't know for sure.
So in terms of reading what's right in front of me, that's what I did. It's the problem with the internet postings. It is plain text. Therefore I and everyone else has to somehow construe all the implicit assumptions one makes which is easier to decipher in person rather than on the internet. I know it annoys people when I do this but I like to make sure I have a good idea of what I'm reading. Another reason why misunderstanding one's post is a common occurrence on here.
I can see what you're trying to say and I hope you see I was disagreeing with the implication of your statement. Not the overall sentiment because in some sense you're right. It does amount to nothing. Like saying "we almost won the title".
Yes but there's a realistic chance of Thiago joining Madrid.
why the hell would you want to loan Thiago when it's clear that's the last thing on anybody's mind.May I be spared rotten tomatoes being thrown at me if I submitted a crazy idea?
Since it's really hard to imagine Barcelona selling us a potential superstar -- Thiago Alcantara -- would we even consider the idea of suggesting to Barca a loan spell for the Spaniard?
Unless, of course, we can come up with another equally outstanding central midfielder, a loan for Alcantara could serve both clubs' interests quite beautifully. Yes, there are other decent midfielders out there who are gettable, but are Fellaini or Cabaye (I really do like Cabaye, though) are nowhere near Alcanatara's quality. Fabregas is up there, but does anyone really believe we're going to land him? I don't see Gundogan going anywhere. We're not going to snatch Wilshere from Wenger. I don't see Real selling Modric to us -- but Modric would be an outstanding acquisition for us. We might pick up Strootman but if we do he wouldn't give us what Alcantara offers. There's been a lot of chatter about James McCarthy over the last week but I trust we all agree James McCarthy is no Thiago Alcantara.
Where I'm going with this if that we can't actually buy a proper midfielder, why not borrow him for a season? I'm not ready to give up on Tom Cleverley quite yet and who knows what the youth pipeline might produce. And what if Alcantara actually warms up to the idea of being a United man after a season? Maybe he'll survey the situation at Barcelona next summer and decide his long term future is at Manchester. And if he decides to go back, then how much worse off are we than where are right now?
If we can buy the boy, let's buy the boy. But unless we can land a mid of the quality of, say, Modric, why not a loan deal for Alcantara?
Van PersieRonaldo Kagawa RooneyThiago CarrickEvra Vidic Rio RafaelDDGMake it happen.
IMO:Someone nerf that team
He said something about Thiagos clause already having been 18 mill but will become 90 mill, not the other way around, as has been reported.
He said people view the clause the wrong way round, because in Rosell's view, basically: it was set at 18 million, and will be 90 million when he plays a lot of games.
Not that it was 90m but got reduced to 18m because he wasn't playing. Potato, potato.
He also said that he'd buy Thiago for 18m and that he hopes he's patient enough to follow the path set by Xavi, Iniesta and Busquets.
In other news, today's frontrunners according to Sport and Mundo Deportivo are listed as: Barcelona, Bayern Munich and United.
IMO:
Van PersieRonaldo_________________ZahaThiago__KagawaCarrickEvra_____Vidic____Jones____RafaelDDG
So he will either join bayern or stay at barca,i hope not.
Because doing a loan deal does not suit us in the long run since we are providing him with games, improving him as a player and then giving him back to his team. If he 17 or 18 then that's a different story but not when he is 22. You want to get something out of this deal.
Edit: FFS it's Ruud. Why did I even bother replying!