Pogue Mahone
Closet Gooner.
My lads are 9 and 6.
I've no plans to get them done.
Completely understandable.
My lads are 9 and 6.
I've no plans to get them done.
A colleagues family and extended family(I am from India) is refusing to get vaccinated because they say that cattle foetal cells are used in the manufacture of all vaccines. They’re the very religious type and the link to cows is what they’re against. He googled and found that this is true of covaxin, the indigenous vaccine here.
https://www.businesstoday.in/corona...making-covaxin-what-experts-298775-2021-06-15
@jojojo, @Wibble, @Brwned, @Pogue Mahone is there anything that is available online that shows this isn’t true for AstraZeneca or Sputnik? These are vulnerable people and it’d be nice if I could help convince them. I am googling but just posting here as you guys have good answers usually.
A colleagues family and extended family(I am from India) is refusing to get vaccinated because they say that cattle foetal cells are used in the manufacture of all vaccines. They’re the very religious type and the link to cows is what they’re against. He googled and found that this is true of covaxin, the indigenous vaccine here.
https://www.businesstoday.in/corona...making-covaxin-what-experts-298775-2021-06-15
@jojojo, @Wibble, @Brwned, @Pogue Mahone is there anything that is available online that shows this isn’t true for AstraZeneca or Sputnik? These are vulnerable people and it’d be nice if I could help convince them. I am googling but just posting here as you guys have good answers usually.
A colleagues family and extended family(I am from India) is refusing to get vaccinated because they say that cattle foetal cells are used in the manufacture of all vaccines. They’re the very religious type and the link to cows is what they’re against. He googled and found that this is true of covaxin, the indigenous vaccine here.
https://www.businesstoday.in/corona...making-covaxin-what-experts-298775-2021-06-15
@jojojo, @Wibble, @Brwned, @Pogue Mahone is there anything that is available online that shows this isn’t true for AstraZeneca or Sputnik? These are vulnerable people and it’d be nice if I could help convince them. I am googling but just posting here as you guys have good answers usually.
I actually don’t know. I could google but you’ve obviously already done that! To get a definitive answer you could phone/email the pharma company (“contact us” on website) They all have Medical Information departments who deal with enquiries like this every day. They’ve probably been asked that exact question many times before.
Amazed so many aren't getting their kids vaccinated. Kids may not have that much individual reward themselves but you get vaccinated to protect those who can't and for the benefit to society and the economy by reducing the overall spread. It will be interesting to see how many of our 5-11 year olds get the jab here as the uptake has been reasonably enthusiastic in the 12-15 ages group. 16+ is already North of 90% but the 20-29 year group are lagging with less than 87% vaccinated. 12-15s are climbing and are over 80% already.
I can fully understand parents who would rather not vaccinate their U12s. We have a huge set of data to reassure us about safety in adults but the numbers aren’t anything like as big for kids and they’re physiologically very different. I’m not really worried about any nasty surprises but in the absence of any compelling upside for the kid getting the jab it’s far from an easy decision. Even at a societal level when we know how effectively vaccines have defanged omicron if enough adults get vaccinated there shouldn’t be any need for the youngest kids to follow suit. And that’s without even getting into the relatively low effectiveness vs transmission of omicron. Which weakens the notion of “taking one for the team”
And I'm not sure the risk for kids of getting covid is insignificant in comparison to the miniscule risk of harm from the vaccine.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...covid-far-outweigh-the-risks-of-myocarditis1/
The model’s main scenario was based on the incidence of COVID in the U.S. as of September 11, 2021, and assumed a vaccine efficacy of 70 percent against disease and 80 percent against hospitalization
Efficacy of two doses against catching omicron is nowhere near 70%. Could be less than half that.
Also need to consider the risk of myocarditis from covid in that article is pre-omicron. I’d like to see some data on omicron but there’s an excellent chance it’s significantly lower.
That would be interesting data and you would hope the covid related harms in general would be less, hopefully far less.
Wouldn't it be nice if we got to a state where extra shots to maintain antibodies weren't needed and memory cells were sufficient protection? Might take a while of course with much of the world still not sufficiently vaxxed. I think the "end" of this shit show may be when we realise that covid hasn't been discussed in everyday conversation for a whole week. I for one am totally over it all.
Boosted last week. Caught it a few days ago. Perfect timing
4th dose (second booster) not showing much benefit in Israel. Have to say I’m pleased. Seems a terrible waste of vaccines now omicron is dominant.
4th dose (second booster) not showing much benefit in Israel. Have to say I’m pleased. Seems a terrible waste of vaccines now omicron is dominant.
There's more than enough cases in the vaccinated countries for variant production. It has been a boring mantra, with little basis on reality, from WHO for a while. Also African countries are wasting 100s of millions of doses through their own incompetence and lack of demand.It feels like such a "rich problem". Wondering if we should move to a 4th dose when low-income states are <10% first dose and thus critical areas for variant production. I think the science of understanding the effect of a 4th dose is noble, but sheesh we have to move quicker on vaccinating the world.
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
4th dose (second booster) not showing much benefit in Israel. Have to say I’m pleased. Seems a terrible waste of vaccines now omicron is dominant.
4th dose (second booster) not showing much benefit in Israel. Have to say I’m pleased. Seems a terrible waste of vaccines now omicron is dominant.
4th dose (second booster) not showing much benefit in Israel. Have to say I’m pleased. Seems a terrible waste of vaccines now omicron is dominant.
Who would of thought piling people with a vaccine that is avoided by the most dominant variant isn't very useful, didn't see that one coming.
You have always struck me as a learned person and I haven't always replied when we have spoken in this thread due to the number of overwhelming replies but a question specifically for you, if you have had the virus (100%) both strains, your body builds an immunity based on antibodies. What is the point of that person getting the vaccine since the vaccine is essentially putting small amounts of the virus in your body to allow your body to create those antibodies (In a more controlled manner), is that correct? Keen to get your thoughts as I know some countries etc are starting to accept proof of having COVID in the past in lieu of a vaccination due to this. What am I missing or do you agree with that logic?
The 3rd shot gave a significant boost in protection vs omicron so it wasn’t a complete punt tbf.
If they are sending instructions to your cells to make a specific part of the virus that attaches to our cells, is the point not that the body does the same thing and creates antibodies? Genuine questionThe new vaccines aren't putting any virus into your body (MRNA ones) they are sending instructions to your cells to make a specific part of the original virus that attaches to human cells.
This is where or the scepticism and stupid gene therapy and altering your DNA crap came from.
It is not though.You have always struck me as a learned person and I haven't always replied when we have spoken in this thread due to the number of overwhelming replies but a question specifically for you, if you have had the virus (100%) both strains, your body builds an immunity based on antibodies. What is the point of that person getting the vaccine since the vaccine is essentially putting small amounts of the virus in your body to allow your body to create those antibodies (In a more controlled manner), is that correct? Keen to get your thoughts as I know some countries etc are starting to accept proof of having COVID in the past in lieu of a vaccination due to this. What am I missing or do you agree with that logic?
You have always struck me as a learned person and I haven't always replied when we have spoken in this thread due to the number of overwhelming replies but a question specifically for you, if you have had the virus (100%) both strains, your body builds an immunity based on antibodies. What is the point of that person getting the vaccine since the vaccine is essentially putting small amounts of the virus in your body to allow your body to create those antibodies (In a more controlled manner), is that correct? Keen to get your thoughts as I know some countries etc are starting to accept proof of having COVID in the past in lieu of a vaccination due to this. What am I missing or do you agree with that logic?
Good response, thanks, I've only had it once (to my knowledge anyway) it was a hypotheticalIf you’ve already had covid twice then yes, the additional protection from a vaccine is likely to be fairly minimal. I don’t think that applies to many people though. The best possible protection seems to come from catching covid once, followed by vaccination. Based on the data to hand anyway.
If they are sending instructions to your cells to make a specific part of the virus that attaches to our cells, is the point not that the body does the same thing and creates antibodies? Genuine question
for 2 months*
Yes, in a perfect world you should be classed as just as well protected from recent infection or vaccination there should be no discrimination between the two for these covid passports.
Unfortunately its not guaranteed that you will be alive post natural infection or your quality of life would be the same as before infection. So it would be an issue morally going round telling people to catch the natural infection so they are trying to discourage this as much as possible.
You are correct in simple terms that post infection and vaccination should both be accepted if there was no politics at play.
Longer than that vs symptomatic illness. And still no evidence of waning vs sever illness/death.
Besides, booster did a great job of taking the edge off the delta wave. It could have got very nasty otherwise. Hopefully delta will be completely eradicated soon.
The trouble is that, it depends on how long ago you were infected, which variant and how powerful was your immune response at the time. We know that people with past infection + vaccination are better protected than those with vaccine alone or infection alone. Boosters also help both groups.You have always struck me as a learned person and I haven't always replied when we have spoken in this thread due to the number of overwhelming replies but a question specifically for you, if you have had the virus (100%) both strains, your body builds an immunity based on antibodies. What is the point of that person getting the vaccine since the vaccine is essentially putting small amounts of the virus in your body to allow your body to create those antibodies (In a more controlled manner), is that correct? Keen to get your thoughts as I know some countries etc are starting to accept proof of having COVID in the past in lieu of a vaccination due to this. What am I missing or do you agree with that logic?
There could be a valid reason to get a 4th shot when the Omicron specific vaccine is ready to protect against any future nasty variants that come from that. I believe Moderna are in phase III trials and Phizer are aiming for March.
I also saw that Moderna are aiming for a combined COVID-19, influenza and RSV vaccine ready for Autumn next year with each element specifically targeted at what is around at the time (similar to influenza now). I can't see any reason not to do that annually as long as it's not a crazy cost to buy.