Big red123
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2014
- Messages
- 1,147
I will be actively not supplying them.
You'll go far
I will be actively not supplying them.
Looks great. Perhaps the croatian flag next to Zebec is a tad big hehe.I think it was @Aldo who made those little tables with flags for @antohan 's alltime draft. Whoever it was, I kinda liked them, so here you go:
players in bold are the pre-66 players. I plan to update it from time to time, not after every pick of course.
It would also be nice if someone checked if I fecked up somewhere. My brain freezed halfway through.
Yeah.Anyone be around to take my pick?
Anyone be around to take my pick?
Yeah, all the flags need a slight correction (in size and positioning, which will happen with the next update .Looks great. Perhaps the croatian flag next to Zebec is a tad big hehe.
Yeah.
send it to me
Popluhar should, Dzajic didn't play before 1968 if I'm not mistaken. Thanks though.Skizzo's Popluhar and harms Dzajic should be in bold? @Balu
Yeah, Dzajic isn't pre-66Popluhar should, Dzajic didn't play before 1968 if I'm not mistaken. Thanks though.
its obvious im going to win this as im the only one with physio....
Didn't Brehme play on the right at the euro's? Don't know myself, i've just seen him in a "best players at the euro's" lineup.Dzajic - Brehme
I think he played on the right in the semifinal loss in '88, but in most games in 88 and 92 he played on the left.Didn't Brehme play on the right at the euro's? Don't know myself, i've just seen him in a "best players at the euro's" lineup.
Right. That's a lethal left side he's got.I think he played on the right in the semifinal loss in '88, but in most games in 88 and 92 he played on the left.
The issue for you is that the performances of your players are rather well known - and some of them simply didn't perform brilliantly in the Euros.
Strangely enough, his record in CEIC is not exactly impressive. But still, one hell of a pick, especially for a fifth round.
I don't think it's any different for the older players than it is with the modern ones, probably a bit more difficult to prove, but in theory not different. For example, I'm sure it will be questioned that Kocsis didn't score as regularly as he did at the World Cup and he won't be rated as highly as in a different context.And most definitely people will be going by reputation, which in theory is against the spirit of this draft.
Strangely enough, his record in CEIC is not exactly impressive. But still, one hell of a pick, especially for a fifth round.
My main concern is midfielders in International Cup. We have no way to judge them at all - attackers, if they play well, will be on the scoresheet, defenders will contribute to the amount of conceded goals - but midfielder's influence isn't seen in the results, we have no sure way of knowing if he played well but his team was below average, or was it the other way, for example.I think that is being disingenuous. His point is that there is no proper documented proof of performances of pre 1960 players in the competition concerned. And most definitely people will be going by reputation, which in theory is against the spirit of this draft.
Yeah, it's difficult to know exactly how well he played in those specific games. However, he was generally excellent at the time of the competition. He was named best player in the world by France Football in 1952, which is pretty much equivalent to a Ballon d'Or, and captained a World XI in 1953 and 1954. I'll have to assume he performed to those standards at the International Cup, unless I find evidence to the contrary.My main concern is midfielders in International Cup. We have no way to judge them at all - attackers, if they play well, will be on the scoresheet, defenders will contribute to the amount of conceded goals - but midfielder's influence isn't seen in the results, we have no sure way of knowing if he played well but his team was below average, or was it the other way, for example.
That's why I didn't pick Ocwirk. The results weren't fantastic and I had no real knowledge of his performances there (and no way to find out about them). Even though he has a massive reputation.
See what Theon and ctp wrote. Pretty much every manager will argue that their oldie player was at their best and it will be hard to argue otherwise due to lack of proper proof unless you go purely by stats. I guess this balances out the fact that many old players don't get their due.I don't think it's any different for the older players than it is with the modern ones, probably a bit more difficult to prove, but in theory not different. For example, I'm sure it will be questioned that Kocsis didn't score as regularly as he did at the World Cup and he won't be rated as highly as in a different context.
FABIO CANNAVARO