AdamColeBebe
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2019
- Messages
- 1,735
- Supports
- Man Utd
He's so weirdI heard he said Danish are nasty people. He's obviously preparing for an invasion.
He's so weirdI heard he said Danish are nasty people. He's obviously preparing for an invasion.
It might get back to normal once we’re past the 2nd Trumo term, but strategically I think we should re-think this relationship as US can no longer be relied upon going forwards, we will always be one Trump away from this nonense but to achieve that you’ve got to have military and energy independence. All the money wasted on green initiatives should be redirected to more pressing matters in my opinion as the rest of the world simply doesn’t give a flying and we can really leave ourselves behind quite badly.
Genius is being pretty generous. Shamelessness and cruelty is not genius.You can hate or love Trump but move for Greenland (not by force of course) is genius move in fact from USA perspective.
Are there MAGA-esque right wingers in Denmark and if so, what are they saying?
Genius is being pretty generous. Shamelessness and cruelty is not genius.
You can hate or love Trump but move for Greenland (not by force of course) is genius move in fact from USA perspective.
It’s all shameless bombast at this point. That bombast is his whole schtick.Its not genius at all.The US is a Nato allly. If the US want greater military presence there agreements can be made. This is shameless imperialism.
Never met one. The main party that is traditionally strongly anti-immigrant is also very strong on maintaining the status quo with Greenland, for example. You won’t find America First people outside of the US, I’d imagine.Are there MAGA-esque right wingers in Denmark and if so, what are they saying?
It’s all shameless bombast at this point. That bombast is his whole schtick.
What he actually does is often very different.
Never met one. The main party that is traditionally strongly anti-immigrant is also very strong on maintaining the status quo with Greenland, for example. You won’t find America First people outside of the US, I’d imagine.
Not so sure about that. He was a huge fan base in Germany. Many right wing voters can relate to him as it seems. Perceive him as an ally of theirs in their war on wokeness and immigration. Really messed up, they actually celebrate policies that would be disadvantageous for our own economy. It's morbidly fascinating how those populists manage to convince uneducated and poor voters to go against their own interests.
It might get back to normal once we’re past the 2nd Trumo term, but strategically I think we should re-think this relationship as US can no longer be relied upon going forwards, we will always be one Trump away from this nonense but to achieve that you’ve got to have military and energy independence. All the money wasted on green initiatives should be redirected to more pressing matters in my opinion as the rest of the world simply doesn’t give a flying and we can really leave ourselves behind quite badly.
How Denmark found themselves in that shitty situation? Why they signed that kind of treaty with Greenland? They had Murtough to negotiate terms?
You can hate or love Trump but move for Greenland (not by force of course) is genius move in fact from USA perspective.
You also have all the entrepreneurs, crypto bros and libertarians. They generally love to glaze the US. At best they turn a blind eye.
This.
Trump might be a senile lunatic, but these aren't his ideas. Hes just the orange boil who symptomizes a disease that runs through the entire country, right down to his chauvinistic base. Europe needs to take matters into their own hands and we need to take control over our own future. Which means energy independence, sustaniable population growth and enough industry/agriculture production to sustain ourselves
Yeah, but in the narrowest sense of when it comes to America's interest vs. the interest of another country, do you think he would get the support of many right-wing types in that nation? If we do a completely analogous hypothetical: If Trump wanted to take over some part of Germany's territory, would it be celebrated by German MAGA types?Not so sure about that. He was a huge fan base in Germany. Many right wing voters can relate to him as it seems. Perceive him as an ally of theirs in their war on wokeness and immigration. Really messed up, they actually celebrate policies that would be disadvantageous for our own economy. It's morbidly fascinating how those populists manage to convince uneducated and poor voters to go against their own interests.
In theory it sounds nice, but Europe is part of the wider world and climate is a shared thing, we can’t go alone, it’s pointless exercise which only fuels populists (who happen to be russia friendly), we need to be competitive and you can’t be when your energy costs are way higher than your main competitors. Unless we have a level playing field we will be left behind by the rest of the world and at that point social / political unrest may reach unthinkable levels. Until China / India / USA commits to the same green revolution you’re just making yourself poorer for no good reason.I don't think there are more pressing matters than climate change. Don't get me wrong, I'm a big advocate of democratic values, freedom of the individual and geopolitical independence but I'd say in Maslow's hierarchy of needs, a habitable planet comes before that stuff
On a sidenote, many people seem to think climate change just means a warmer planet. Once shit gets serious, the geopolitical implications will be immense and there will be wars over habitable territories and resources on a scale our generation hasn't witnessed.
Yeah, but in the narrowest sense of when it comes to America's interest vs. the interest of another country, do you think he would get the support of many right-wing types in that nation? If we do a completely analogous hypothetical: If Trump wanted to take over some part of Germany's territory, would it be celebrated by German MAGA types?
In theory it sounds nice, but Europe is part of wider world and climate is a shared thing, we can’t go alone, it’s pointless exercise which only fuels populist (who happen to be russia friendly), we need to be competitive and you can’t be when your energy costs are way higher than your main competitors. Unless we have a level playing field we will be left behind by the rest of the world and at that point social / political unrest may reach unthinkable levels. Until China / India / USA commits to the same green revolution you’re just making yourself poorer for no good reason.
Yes but we have plenty of fossil fuels in EU / UK the governments simply need to easy restrictions for extracting them and remove a lot of the regulations (including banking) which make them currently uneconomical for exploitation. Also nuclear power has been overlooked completely, just look at Germany.India emits far less per capita than European countries.
More importantly, unlike the USA which is an energy superpower, the European continent is generally dependent on external suppliers for its fossil fuels and will therefore remain at the mercy of, at best increasingly unstable allies and at worst actual enemies, for its fossil fuel needs unless it manages to wean itself off.
Yes but we have plenty of fossil fuels in EU / UK the governments simply need to easy restrictions for extracting them and remove a lot of the regulations (including banking) which make them currently uneconomical for exploitation. Also nuclear power has been overlooked completely, just look at Germany.
That's bizarre and I don't think we've gotten anywhere near that point in Denmark. The right-wing parties in Denmark generally do not lot overlap fully with a Trump type agenda. For instance, we can have a party that is strictly anti-immigrant (anti-Muslim essentially), but then be very pro welfare state. On the other hand, the most economically libertarian party do not necessarily focus heavily on the immigration topic. It's one of the benefits of a system with many different parties.I genuinely believe they'd do, at least if the current government is left leaning. Large portions of the AfD folks would rather be "ruled" by Trump than by Habeck and Baerbock, I guarantee you that, and those who don't live in the territory in question would put the blame on the government and not on Trump with a "told you so" attitude.
It's absolutely mental how irrelevant facts have become in political opinioning. Not only in regards to the AfD but in general. CDU/CSU is currently leading in the polls by a huge margin with downright disgusting populism on the back of welfare recipients, refugees and climate change. They promise tax reductions accounting to >€100bn but over €50bn of those would go to the richest 10% and over €28bn of those to the richest 1%. Only €12bn would go to the "poorest" 50%. It's honestly incredibly difficult to not become completely cynical right now.
Not really for shale gas alone, EU countries are almost on par with the US when it comes to technically recoverable resources from the ground we just decided to shoot ourselves in the foot by not taking advantage of it (through hard Russian lobbing and using green parties as their useful idiots).‘Plenty’ is doing a lot of heavy lifting there, especially as the two countries with the highest reserves aren’t even in the EU and this is one of the most heavily industrialised places on the planet. We’re not talking Venezuela/Russia levels of reserves here.
Nuclear power I’m not necessarily against.
Not really for shale gas alone, EU countries are almost on par with the US when it comes to technically recoverable resources from the ground we just decided to shoot ourselves in the foot by not taking advantage of it (through hard Russian lobbing and using green parties as their useful idiots).
I think that’s the goal behind the bombast. Then this fully independent Greenland can enter into some kind of new arrangement with the US, with the latter offering all kinds of inducements to make the arrangement as close as possible.I'm not sure this time around I think he'll aim for a policy that will leave a legacy and expanding US territory is certainly one way to do it. The strategic interests probably go beyond Trumpian bombast.
If they can already declare independence unilaterally from Denmark you could see Trump promising enough money to Greenland to convince the majority. It'd probably cost less than the money the US currently gives to Israel to kill women and children.
https://oilindustryinsight.com/oil-gas/petroknowledge/europe-shale-gas-an-overview/Do you have a source for this?
According to Energy Information Administration, European Union countries have more than 470 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable resources of shale gas.
While Europe countries have significant shale resources, policies adapted by the EU countries are not in favor of shale gas development. Among EU countries, only Poland has ongoing exploratory programs.
Wait til someone tells him that America is named after an Italian cartographerWants to land grab Greenland (nothing to do with resources nuh uh), and take control of the Panama Canal for economic stability for the US.
What’s the difference between that and what the Chinese are threatening over Taiwan?
Also wants to rename the gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America because it’s got a nice ring to it.
Also trolling Canadians right now
The man’s a troll, I can’t believe the world has to go through this again with him
Wait til someone tells him that America is named after an Italian cartographer
Specially Denmark. The Danish political establishment is one of the most pro US in the world. The US could absolutely get many concessions from Denmark in Greenland, including military presence as long the Greenlanders are on board and benefit from it.Its not genius at all.The US is a Nato allly. If the US want greater military presence there agreements can be made. This is shameless imperialism.
Specially Denmark. The Danish political establishment is one of the most pro US in the world. The US could absolutely get many concessions from Denmark in Greenland, including military presence as long the Greenlanders are on board and benefit from it.
This is more Trump's ego at work. He needs his "legacy" to include a piece of land that he added to the US. Greenland and the Panama Canal are easier and less cumbersome to get hold of than a piece of Canada, nevermind Mexico.