Grylte
"nothing wrong with some friendly incest, bro"
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2014
- Messages
- 15,317
I found it a bit strange that the seer chose to check Charlotte, who she trusted the most, instead of Alexander who noone really ever trusted.
I found it a bit strange that the seer chose to check Charlotte, who she trusted the most, instead of Alexander who noone really ever trusted.
Alexander admittedly screwed himself at that last roundtable, but still gutted was wasn't a winner, but he never really gained trust from anyone so he wasn't ever going to be there at the end.
As for just voting people off, it makes sense if you have enough support in the final four and enough doubt about others. I think it's fair to say Leanne and Jake never really had any trust in Alexander (based on idiotic assumptions, but still), and Frankie was probably suspecting everyone after that Charlotte reveal.
Then, not knowing Charlotte was a traitor, it made sense to vote off Frankie.
So I don't see a problem with them continuing to vote, everyone at the pit voted to banish in every round they were in, so there was clearly a massive lack of confidence. And as a faithful, it just makes more sense to reduce the chance to as small a percentage as possible.
I don't know, that actually felt like the most cynical group of the three series so far. I still can't get over Leanne's reaction to Alexander voting for her, right after she voted for him. Of all the people in that game she seemed the most incapable of seeing it from someone else's perspective. Which probably worked in her favour in the end, sad as it is to say.
Is it better to go into the final rounds knowing the person you're trusting is trustworthy or not, or the person you aren't is trustworthy or not? It might be better to know if your support is solid or not, rather than people you'd be looking to vote out.
And if she'd picked Alexander gone back and and said he was Faithful, they probably would have just assumed they're both traitors and she was covering for him. Doesn't seem like there was a huge amount of trust of Frankie.
Oooo - I like this!Or reduce the prize money for every faithful banished in the end game.
Good ideaOr reduce the prize money for every faithful banished in the end game.
I think they also should offer ex traitors a small % of the pot if a traitor wins.That's a great idea
Yep this too. Traitors should win as a team. Or maybe past a certain point.I think they also should offer ex traitors a small % of the pot if a traitor wins.
They need to try and get the traitors to work together and stop them from voting out other traitors once they know their goose is cooked.
It would also mean that late stage recruitment of traitors wasn't just a "be recruited or die" option that makes them an obvious patsy to be voted out. They would be gaining a bit of cash as an incentive.
I think they also should offer ex traitors a small % of the pot if a traitor wins.
They need to try and get the traitors to work together and stop them from voting out other traitors once they know their goose is cooked.
It would also mean that late stage recruitment of traitors wasn't just a "be recruited or die" option that makes them an obvious patsy to be voted out. They would be gaining a bit of cash as an incentive.
Exactly. Freddie was likely going to be voted out anyway so the trick was pointless. And if the seer situation had played out the same way she might have had more people think it was a Frankie double bluff because she would have had zero suspicions re: Freddie.I think Charlotte could've won if she didn't recruit Freddie, and did the "trick" on him by making him try to kill Leanne.
She had no suspicion on her before he voted for her in revenge.
Turns out Olivia has a bunch of nude pics she took and posted online, but the vetting team failed in their job to make sure all contestants had nothing in their past that was not family-friendly.
Ah no that's disgusting! Where even are these photos?! That's grim...Turns out Olivia has a bunch of nude pics she took and posted online, but the vetting team failed in their job to make sure all contestants had nothing in their past that was not family-friendly.
It would not surprise me.The downward trend with contestant selection suggests we might even have some onlyfans models next series.
Ah no that's disgusting! Where even are these photos?! That's grim...
Eye in or out?Turns out Olivia has a bunch of nude pics she took and posted online, but the vetting team failed in their job to make sure all contestants had nothing in their past that was not family-friendly.
In I think.Eye in or out?
It's not when you consider they all pretty much planned on dwindling down the numbers to just two. If she had 100% faith in Charlotte who also was her mate, they'd be almost guaranteed the win.I found it a bit strange that the seer chose to check Charlotte, who she trusted the most, instead of Alexander who noone really ever trusted.
Seen them earlier on in the season by accident. Not bad.Turns out Olivia has a bunch of nude pics she took and posted online, but the vetting team failed in their job to make sure all contestants had nothing in their past that was not family-friendly.
Especially since she doesn't know whenever there's one or two traitors left (they've all entertained the idea of a second one still being around), going for someone who you trust the most (and who, you think, trusts you back) in order to be 100% sure is the move. I think most seasons ended up with 2 people anyway, be it a pair of faithfuls or a traitor and his trusting pet, so ensuring your a ride or day if you have that option is a must. She was unlucky that her ride or die turned out to be a traitor which, inevitably, led to her demise.Yeah, in hindsight it obviously looks genious, but it didn't really make sense to me at the time when she did it.
I would definitely check someone i wasn't sure about.
The vote from Freddie (i think that was his name) did probably affect them quite a bit too, it's weird being in that bubble they're in in games like this.
I do enjoy a bit of traitors, the one thing that doesn't sit right though is that there is basically no point in voting out a traitor as they just recruit another.
A very simple fix would be that the faithful also have a separate prize pot, and every time they catch a traitor 5k is taken from the main pot and put in the faithful pot along with an additional 5K.
That would incentivize catching them and also make the traitors think twice about throwing another traitor under the bus........ Could also do things with that money like in the endgame every time a faithful gets banished they lose a few grand from that pot.
What would be your strategy if you were a faithful/traitor?
I think any strategy you may have just goes straight out the window once it gets going. You're much better off just playing it by ear.What would be your strategy if you were a faithful/traitor?
One benefit though is that it gives the faithful the chance to become a traitor and its easier to be a faithful turned traitor than a traitor from the beginning. I definitely don't think there should be a murder and a recruit at the same time as that just penalises the faithful.
Mostly as it just depends on who else is playing the game. A mix of Dan and Jake from this series though is a good go to. Remembering that it's an individual game because you can't really trust anyone, but being just enough of a team player so that others trust you're a faithful.I think any strategy you may have just goes straight out the window once it gets going. You're much better off just playing it by ear.
Absolutely it does. You could prepare and prepare but there's really no point.Mostly as it just depends on who else is playing the game. A mix of Dan and Jake from this series though is a good go to. Remembering that it's an individual game because you can't really trust anyone, but being just enough of a team player so that others trust you're a faithful.