Abraxas
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2021
- Messages
- 6,313
People keep going on about it being right to be cynical, and it's the same old crap.
But there's a pretty significant difference in that it's a completely different man that is tasked with overseeing the strategic direction of the club. He might be "one of the boys" but he's never had this kind of role and just because he has come from that background doesn't mean he's clueless. Leadership isn't something you can create easily, you essentially have it or you don't.
As long as Arnold is empowered to do his job, then he is fully able to follow these things through. Then it only comes down to his ability. There is no suggestion that Ed Woodward lacked power, what we actually suffered from was poor leadership and absent owners. Well, you can get away with absent owners if the top exec can lead. That remains to be seen but I don't see any need to be overly cynical, I'm happy to see a change and to let it play out.
But there's a pretty significant difference in that it's a completely different man that is tasked with overseeing the strategic direction of the club. He might be "one of the boys" but he's never had this kind of role and just because he has come from that background doesn't mean he's clueless. Leadership isn't something you can create easily, you essentially have it or you don't.
As long as Arnold is empowered to do his job, then he is fully able to follow these things through. Then it only comes down to his ability. There is no suggestion that Ed Woodward lacked power, what we actually suffered from was poor leadership and absent owners. Well, you can get away with absent owners if the top exec can lead. That remains to be seen but I don't see any need to be overly cynical, I'm happy to see a change and to let it play out.