The Sun: Marcus Rashford and Jesse Lingard handed a lifeline as Ten Hag is prepared to offer a chance

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,518
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/18426101/marcus-rashford-jesse-lingard-man-utd-erik-ten-hag/

A source said on Rashford: “He knows Ten Hag will give him a chance if he performs in training, so he’s feeling confident and can’t wait for a new start.”

On Lingard: “He was resigned to the idea that he was going to leave and make a fresh start at another club.

"But Ten Hag has let it be known he wants to speak with him and if he gives him the assurances he needs, Jesse could be persuaded to stay.

“United is his club and he’s never wanted to leave.”

More quotes in the article. Not sure if it’s their camp feeding the information or ten Hag has already offered them assurance. Either way, it’s interesting.
 
“United is his club and he’s never wanted to leave.”

100% simply not true.
 
I'm not surprised. Unlike many here, I never believed there was going to be a massive clear out other than those whose contracts were expiring.

The likes of rashford, martial, Lingard, telles, Bailly, dalot etc will all be given chances to 'prove themselves' to the manager. And thus this cycle of mediocrity shall carry on.
 
Rashford can stay for another year but Lingard no thanks.
 
ETH is the manager and if he thinks these players offer something he wants to the team then that's it. Doesn't matter what the "experts" think.
 
The article is written a made up journalist...what do you think.
 
Maybe the Caf's predictions of a wholesale clear out are wide of the mark

There will be wholesale clear out. We have so many players who are out of contract and players like Bailly/Jones/Henderson all wants to leave.
 
“United is his club and he’s never wanted to leave.”

100% simply not true.

Sure why the feck would he want to leave.

It should be about whether the fraud wants to leave or not he's not prime Messi.
The club decide.
.
 
The fact Lingard wants assurances like the article suggests is even more proof (like there wasn't enough already) that he should be happily let go.

Hope it isn't true, and just those two posturing about being wanted by United when they eventually sign for new clubs ("they really wanted me to stay, but I needed a new challenge").
 
Ah yes. I was an idiot to think Lingard would ever leave.
 
ETH is the manager and if he thinks these players offer something he wants to the team then that's it. Doesn't matter what the "experts" think.
He would be stupid to trust these players. Just like his predecessors.
 
He would be stupid to trust these players. Just like his predecessors.

Or maybe he knows what he is doing.

Anyways it's from Sun but it will be hilarious in July/August when so many will have meltdown because of few players.
 
Rashford can stay for another year but Lingard no thanks.

Lingard has shown at West Ham how well he can play if given a chance - I dont see a problem with this rather than giving him away
 
There's absolutely no question rashford will be given a chance under ETH

I highly doubt lingard will be here next season though
 
It's not interesting it's fecking terrifying.
Absolutely terrifying.

If they get new deals then prepare for more of the same after 6 months.

fecking hell

Yeah, I hope it's bullshit because it's absolute insanity otherwise.

Jesse Lingard is 30 this year and has played 230-odd games for Manchester United. He's never looked good enough aside from a few week long purple patch four years ago. How many fecking chances does he need? :wenger:
 
Lingard has shown at West Ham how well he can play if given a chance - I dont see a problem with this rather than giving him away
The lad is poison. He’s been leaking left right and centre and it’s clear to anyone with half a brain he’s part of the toxicity.

This club needs to move forward from having a squad full of completely unserious professionals.
 
I'm not surprised. Unlike many here, I never believed there was going to be a massive clear out other than those whose contracts were expiring.

The likes of rashford, martial, Lingard, telles, Bailly, dalot etc will all be given chances to 'prove themselves' to the manager. And thus this cycle of mediocrity shall carry on.
But Lingard's contact is expiring.
 
Out of these two, only Lingard has better chance to be suitable in ETH’s system. Lingard is at least pressing, while Rashford is one of the laziest players on the pitch in our squad.
 
A tip to consider when posting links to articles. Something I learnt at school

Who – Who made the source - did they have an opinion or bias? Were they involved?
What – What information does the source give? Is it the full story? Is it accurate?
Why – Why was the source made? Was it made to persuade people of a particular opinion? Was it made to take the mickey out of something/someone?
When – Was it made at the time? Or years later? Was the person there?
Where – Where was the source made? Were they involved in the event? Did they have an opinion?
 
I can kinda see Lingard staying, deping on who else leaves

If you're losing Cavani, Mata, Ronaldo, Greenwood, Pogba, Matic and Martial then there's a huge space in your squad that'll costs a fortune to replace all at once.
 
A tip to consider when posting links to articles. Something I learnt at school

Who – Who made the source - did they have an opinion or bias? Were they involved?
What – What information does the source give? Is it the full story? Is it accurate?
Why – Why was the source made? Was it made to persuade people of a particular opinion? Was it made to take the mickey out of something/someone?
When – Was it made at the time? Or years later? Was the person there?
Where – Where was the source made? Were they involved in the event? Did they have an opinion?

Who - who is going to remember this list of tips in an hours time?

Good tips though.
 
A tip to consider when posting links to articles. Something I learnt at school

Who – Who made the source - did they have an opinion or bias? Were they involved?
What – What information does the source give? Is it the full story? Is it accurate?
Why – Why was the source made? Was it made to persuade people of a particular opinion? Was it made to take the mickey out of something/someone?
When – Was it made at the time? Or years later? Was the person there?
Where – Where was the source made? Were they involved in the event? Did they have an opinion?

:lol:
 
The snitch should be kicked out of the squad