FFP vote update
1. Should there be an amendment to the FFP rules to make individual offences expire after a period of time?
(a) Yes, offences should expire after a period of time (21): Gillingham, Nottingham Forest, Darlington, Leyton Orient, Southampton, Hereford, Chelsea, Bristol City, Bradford City, Wolverhampton Wanderers, Everton, Leeds United, Middlesbrough, Tottenham Hotspur, Aston Villa, Barnsley, Cardiff City, Manchester United, Liverpool, Bournemouth, Manchester City
(b) No, keep things as they are (2): Newcastle United, Southend United
2. If individual offences are allowed to expire after a period of time, how long should this be?
(a) Two years (roughly five seasons) (12): Gillingham, Darlington, Leyton Orient, Southampton, Bradford City, Wolverhampton Wanderers, Everton, Leeds United, Middlesbrough, Cardiff City, Bournemouth, Manchester City
(b) Three years (roughly seven seasons) (9): Nottingham Forest, Hereford, Chelsea, Bristol City, Tottenham Hotspur, Aston Villa, Barnsley, Manchester United
, Liverpool
(c) Four years (roughly ten seasons) (1): Newcastle United
Abstain (1): Southend United
Still to vote:
1. Arsenal - Sepukku
2. Sunderland - 2mufc0
3. Fulham - infamous7
4. West Ham United - TheReligion
5. Milton Keynes Dons - Springfield WildCats
6. Blackburn Rovers - LitterBug (banned)
7. Kidderminster Harriers - Akash (banned)
8. Norwich City - coolredwine
9. Plymouth Argyle - Panther
10. Rochdale - Trionz (banned)