Am doing, thanks. Though the last two friendlies I had this season I cruised then got smashed in the league.
Tried that at one point and didn't work either.Perhaps move player position around. Switch Isco and Kroos. I am rigid about this stuff.
Gaming The SM RedCafe League
- Thread starter Damien
- Start date
Ballon d'Or nominees and their clubs
Guinness is like sweet, sweet nectar
beats a bag of Dutch gold cans and a random bush any dayProves how broken this game is
Lenglet with a +1 to 88 only
jeeezz
jeeezz
Yeah they're pretty strict. It is okay though, I can take him off your hands.
Yup. Phil was saying about how he had an injured RB(?) in first XI he forgot to sub out, and instead of the assistant manager putting the RB on the bench in place of him, he put one of the attackers there and ended up with a rating of 3.
Pep in disguise
Stain gives JMH a slap down on the SM forums:
Fecking owned him.RKO and a half that!
Leave Pulisic out of this ya big bollix!!
niceGuinness is like sweet, sweet nectar
Going to agree on that one there... more a galahad man myself! :P
With Isco's rise the average is now 93.6. All the better to lose with... just wish the arses gave Kimmich and Sterling their rises.
He just said Volland has been going through a purple patch and shouldn't rise but gave Zaha as an example of a player that's rise was justified...
Zaha a player who is the very definition of inconsistent. Playing for a club that is not only in the relegation zone but who's form in the past 12 months has been shambolic at best.
Volland scoring 15 goals and 2 assists (30 games) compared to Zahas 8 with 5 assists (32 games). One club who's been in relegation form, the other who's been a solid top 6 in their respected leagues. This is why people like him shouldn't rate players. They simple aren't in the same bracket as each other. Palace are a tier or two below Bayer as a club in the first place.
Race to 90 (II)
Name (Team): Player Name - Updated Rating (Start Rating)
Name (Team): Player Name - Updated Rating (Start Rating)
- Gythio (Aston Villa): Tom Davies - 85 (76)
- Herrera (QPR): Federico Valverde - 83 (78)
- infamous7 (Fulham): Jonathan Ikone - 82 (77)
- It's a farce! (Norwich City): Achraf Hakimi - 82 (77)
- Dom Gill (Barnsley): Cucho Hernandez - 82 (78)
- Mr Anderson (Liverpool): Pietro Pellegri - 80 (70)
- green_smiley (Southend Utd): Moise Kean - 80 (76)
- Wino1 (Wolverhampton): Ronaldo Vieira - 80 (77)
- harshad (Bristol City): Justin Kluivert - 78 (78)
- christy07 (Chelsea): Branimir Kalaica - 76 (76)
- The Stain (Everton): Angel Gomes - 75 (70)
- langster (Derby): Abdou Diakhate - 75 (75)
- RedSky (Hereford): Atakan Akkaynak - 73 (70)
- Damien (Man Utd): Vinicius Junior - 70 (70)
- The Taurean (Forest): Milton Valenzuela - 70 (70)
100% friendly win rate and 100% league non-win rate so far. Beat Chelsea in tonight's friendly, now to lose 3:0 to Norwich tomorrow.
Fingers crossed I guess!
Barca review today. Would be typical if umtiti doesn't get a rise given he's injured
- Nacho Fernandez (27/89): +1 to 90
- Yeray Alvarez (22/87): no change
- Fabian Ruiz (21/80): +3 to 83
- Ousmane Dembele (20/90): no change
- Manuel Nolito (31/91): -1 to 90
- Carlos Bacca (31/91): no change
- Simone Zaza (26/89): +1 to 90
- Pablo Maffeo (20/80): +3 to 83
Sigh.
Considering Bailly didn't even rise from 90 to 91, it's sort of a lost cause expecting 91 to 92 mid season.
At least they're consistently shit, they have that going for them. What's Umtiti's rating on RM @RedSky
Mixed reviews all around.
Ter stegen 92
93 rating - £43,881,000
He's the 2nd most valuable CB.
David Alaba - 95 - (£61,659,000)
Samuel Umtiti - 93 - (£43,881,000)
Raphaël Varane - 93 - (£43,081,000)
Marquinhos - 93 - (£42,613,000)
Sergio Busquets - 94 - (£41,575,000)
Casemiro - 93 - (£40,790,000)
Gerard Piqué - 94 - (£38,068,000)
Sergio Ramos - 94 - (£36,440,000)
Diego Godín - 94 - (£34,420,000)
John Stones - 92 - (£34,120,000)
Makes sense. Young and already top drawer playing at one of the biggest clubs in the world.
How do you consider individual league and then also club influence on value?
Valuation is calculated based on Rating, Age and Club.
The Club Bonus is determined from the Club Rating. Lower the Club Rating the lower the bonus.
If the player is less than 80 rating he gets no club bonus (deemed a youth player). If however he's over 80 rating the player is awarded a fraction of the Club Bonus, higher the rating, higher the Bonus.
Club...................................Club Rating...............Club Bonus
Real Madrid...........................1227.0..................£11,570,000
FC Barcelona.........................1201.9..................£11,319,000
Bayern Munich.......................1071.8..................£10,018,000
Juventus FC...........................1026.5..................£9,565,000
Atlético Madrid.......................1009.6..................£9,396,000
Paris Saint-Germain................916.3...................£8,463,000
Manchester City......................901.4...................£8,314,000
Sevilla FC..............................798.6...................£7,286,000
AS Monaco............................749.5...................£6,795,000
FC Porto...............................731.3...................£6,613,000
SSC Napoli............................721.4...................£6,514,000
Arsenal FC............................718.7...................£6,487,000
Manchester United.................711.9...................£6,419,000
Now as it's based on Club Rating, the Bonus will improve if the Clubs form improves. This means the valuation system is fluid and will match how a Club is performing. A player might have the same rating but if the Club Rating drastically improves his valuation will improve. To get the full bonus you need to be 99 rated, currently nobody in the database is 99.
So how did you get the club ratings(like UEFA coefficient)? Specially for teams outside europe.
I don't rate clubs outside of Europe (yet). But when we eventually get round to adding South America we'll do exactly the same process but with the Copa Libertadores replacing Champions League.
Club Rating is based on results in their domestic league but each club gets bonus points if they draw/win in Europe. Qualifiers are also recorded but are given half points (1.5 for a win, 0.5 for a draw). Each month, every club gets rerated based on the previous 3 years worth of form. I've been doing this for 17months now so have a decent amount of data.
Sweet. Can't imagine how vast this might have gotten from the initial concept.
The Club Rating System is the key component in the entire Rating System tbh.
Ridiculous that Semedo went straight to 90 when he isn't even definitely first choice for Barcelona yet.
Manchester United La Liga players
Kylian Mbappe: from 18/88 to 18/91
John Stones: from 23/89 to 23/90
Jose Gaya: from 22/89 to 22/90
- Sergio Ramos (31/95 +0): no change
- Toni Kroos (27/95 +0): no change
- Gareth Bale (28/95 -1): no change
- Antoine Griezmann (26/95 +0): no change
- Alarcon Isco (25/92 +0): +1 to 93
- Sergi Roberto (25/91 +0): no change
- Gabriel Mercado (30/89 +0): no change
- Jose Gaya (22/89 +0): +1 to 90
- Santi Mina (21/87 +0): no change
- Enes Unal (20/85 +0): no change
- Worse than predicted
- Predicted
- Better than predicted
Kylian Mbappe: from 18/88 to 18/91
John Stones: from 23/89 to 23/90
Jose Gaya: from 22/89 to 22/90
You'd think that the same thing happening at the same club at the same bloody position as recently as last year would tell them not to jump the gun. What was the name of the RB they signed to replace Alves who was bumped to 90 just because of the transfer and ended up being absolutely shit?
Vidal? Forgot all about him