CS@SG
New Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2015
- Messages
- 1,290
Like this option, is he still at BM?Would love Javi Martinez as well.
Like this option, is he still at BM?Would love Javi Martinez as well.
SsshhhhSchweinsteiger?
Fletch was underrated.
I'd love to see TFM given the chance.
He was brilliant the games he got last year.
Rashford is rated higher by most, cause he scored lots of goals, but i can't remember seeing TFM doing mistakes.
In my opinion, TFM is just a big a talent as Rashford, and is perfect as CDM.
That being said, i think Mourinho prefers more experienced players in that position.
Though, thinking about it, Mourinho has managed without that Verratti type player in the past hasn't he?
Take the Makelele/Essien/Lampard midfield of his earlier Chelsea side. It's a strong and effective midfield but one without someone quite of the mold we're discussing in this thread.
Ruben Nevas?
Good point.Though, thinking about it, Mourinho has managed without that Verratti type player in the past hasn't he?
Take the Makelele/Essien/Lampard midfield of his earlier Chelsea side. It's a strong and effective midfield but one without someone quite of the mold we're discussing in this thread.
It is definitely something that needs looking at. Whatever way you spin it the balance of that midfield just isn't quite right and in the tight games it is causing us to go from dominating to looking really scrappy.
I do think the need for a playmaker is being overstated slightly though, as with a destroyer DM type player we would be controlling the game a lot more anyway than we currently are with our midfield being cut wide open.
Two B2B and a destroyer would work just as well as a deep lying playmaker I feel.
I agree, he's got plenty of options in midfield, he's also got a player base that is capable of playing a multitude of formations in several different ways. Time will tell I suppose.If we're going to have any faith in the manager at all (and god knows it's hard after watching our last two games) then we have to stop coming up with signings we need to make to get this team to function.
Mourinho made it quite clear in the summer that he identified what we needed and got what he wanted. Coming up with names of signings that will "fix" us is doing the manager a disservice. His United career (and our season) will live or die on his ability to build a winning team out of the players already at the club. That's something Mourinho obviously believes he can do, so it's a waste of time speculating about missing pieces in his jigsaw.
I'm a huge fan of the deep lying playmaker, but i'm beginning to agree.
A player like Saul would be fantastic. I wouldn't call him a playmaker, but he is very good at simply passing the ball forwards, besides that he is an excellent defender. He reminds me a bit of Roy Keane.
This.Schweinsteiger is easily the best option available at the club.
This.
Schweinsteiger Or Carrick, Jose need to play one of these two in DLP role along with Pogba and Herrera in three man midfield.
Well with schweinsteiger alienated it would be Carrick every game which won't work.
I wouldn't mind Herrera playing behind Pogba and Fellani on Sunday however Rooney is going to play as he was rested yesterday so it seems we'll see Pogba and another on Sunday.
Would love Javi Martinez as well.
I do think the need for a playmaker is being overstated slightly though, as with a destroyer DM type player we would be controlling the game a lot more anyway than we currently are with our midfield being cut wide open.
Two B2B and a destroyer would work just as well as a deep lying playmaker I feel.
But that forces the other CMs to fall back to get close to the defensive mid, because he doesn't have the passing range to get the ball into higher areas. Which in turn forces their potential passing options in attack to fall back deeper too, to keep connection to the CMs.Yeah my point exactly a destroyer that is just going to give the ball to the two b2b in front of him would work fine.
But that forces the other CMs to fall back to get close to the defensive mid, because he doesn't have the passing range to get the ball into higher areas. Which in turn forces their potential passing options in attack to fall back deeper too, to keep connection to the CMs.
If you haven't got players who can comfortably complete more ambitious passes under pressure (= playmakers), your CM will either lose connection to the attack, or the whole team gets pushed back into deeper areas. And playing out of those deep areas effectively against a good pressing team will require exactly the type of players your hypothetical midfield lacks.
If the opponent chooses to sit deep, this midfield won't have the creativity and passing technique to play through the thicket of defenders.
The only style that you can play consistently with a setup like this is a strict counter-attacking style, where you mostly cede possession to the opponent.
And fecked up their build up play. The exact thing I described happens in every Real game with that setup: Both Kroos and Modric will drop deep to take over the build up play from Casemiro, because he can't do that. Therefore all three CMs start the attack right in front of their back four (Casemiro can't push up high effectively, too) and the presence in higher central midfield areas is often nonexistent. The whole thing is made worse by the fact that BBC likes to stay as high up as possible, which severes their midfield from their attack.Real have Kroos but had to change his role to incorporate casemiro which then improved results.
No, they generally can play 10-20 yards passes sideways under pressure, but not vertical through the opponents' lines. That would be exactly the DLP type of passing. So these destroyers do not get the ball in higher areas, they need to give it to players who can (and who in turn are absent as passing options higher up).It's one of those little things in football that gets massively overblown as most defensive midfielders are capable of playing little 10-20 yard passes and feeding the most advanced midfielders.
Blind can control a game
I'm saying based on the fact PL teams are doing terrible in both Euro competitions in recent years, technically outclassed as our brute force PL style is undone by even the secondary Spanish and German teams. All the teams excelling now have technically superior midfield's, not just workhorses.
And fecked up their build up play. The exact thing I described happens in every Real game with that setup: Both Kroos and Modric will drop deep to take over the build up play from Casemiro, because he can't do that. Therefore all three CMs start the attack right in front of their back four (Casemiro can't push up high effectively, too) and the presence in higher central midfield areas is often nonexistent. The whole thing is made worse by the fact that BBC likes to stay as high up as possible, which severes their midfield from their attack.
No, they generally can play 10-20 yards passes sideways under pressure, but not vertical through the opponents' lines. That would be exactly the DLP type of passing. So these destroyers do not get the ball in higher areas, they need to give it to players who can (and who in turn are absent as passing options higher up).
The point you're making is far to general. Only one team can win the CL and it helps if you have Messi, CR, Bale, Neymar et al. The difference ultimately comes down to the quality up front. Put these players in an Arsenal team, and they've would have won the CL in my opinion.
Marco Verratti or Toni Kroos followed by Julian Weigl
Schweinsteiger is easily the best option available at the club.
Yes, of course a DLP is linked to a whole concept of setting up the team. And I don't expect Mourinho to suddenly develop a taste for that kind of setup. He was always a counter-attacking coach and relied on combative central midfielders rather than creative ones (he often chose Khedira over Modric at Real for example).We've got a target man to hit though unlike real. Plus I'm not convinced that a player such as TFM or Schniderlin couldn't hit a 20/30 yard ball forward to Pogba or Herrera.
The DLP that most people want is the pirlo/Scholes 'run the game' type player. I don't think we need that type of player to be successful with the team we have got.
Actually it's the lack of James playing in the hole rather than Casemiro's inability to build play. Kroos and Modric are similar players but they are not Trequartistas like James. They can't provide the cutting edge in the final third like what James can do. Having Casemiro in the team gives them better control in midfield. Before that Kroos had to do the bulk of defending in midfield which really is his main weakness. They were getting thrashed by Barca and Atletico. Their record against the big teams with Casemiro speaks for itself.And fecked up their build up play. The exact thing I described happens in every Real game with that setup: Both Kroos and Modric will drop deep to take over the build up play from Casemiro, because he can't do that. Therefore all three CMs start the attack right in front of their back four (Casemiro can't push up high effectively, too) and the presence in higher central midfield areas is often nonexistent. The whole thing is made worse by the fact that BBC likes to stay as high up as possible, which severes their midfield from their attack.
I know that's a widespread opinion, but I still stand with mine.Actually it's the lack of James playing in the hole rather than Casemiro's inability to build play. Kroos and Modric are similar players but they are not Trequartistas like James. They can't provide the cutting edge in the final third like what James can do. Having Casemiro in the team gives them better control in midfield. Before that Kroos had to do the bulk of defending in midfield which really is his main weakness. They were getting thrashed by Barca and Atletico. Their record against the big teams with Casemiro speaks for itself.
Ssshhhh
If we're looking for a controlling midfielder, I think we should go with experience. Not many young players can come in and control a game from deep -- Verratti could, but PSG are never selling him. Jose knows the value of experience, so I think getting a player in for a couple of seasons would be fine. All we need is a seasoned veteran who won't need time to adapt and who isn't injury prone.
I'd love to see TFM given the chance.
He was brilliant the games he got last year.
Rashford is rated higher by most, cause he scored lots of goals, but i can't remember seeing TFM doing mistakes.
In my opinion, TFM is just a big a talent as Rashford, and is perfect as CDM.
That being said, i think Mourinho prefers more experienced players in that position.
Yes and is playing at CB at the moment. Wish we had signed him and Herrera together. They gave us hell when we played Bilbao.Like this option, is he still at BM?
Essien was a bison god. Man, I miss watching him play at his best. Just wish he signed for us back then.Though, thinking about it, Mourinho has managed without that Verratti type player in the past hasn't he?
Take the Makelele/Essien/Lampard midfield of his earlier Chelsea side. It's a strong and effective midfield but one without someone quite of the mold we're discussing in this thread.
Getting stuck in does not mean you can dictate and control a midfield. Modric can control the midfield flow, by utilising his experience, reading of the game and excellent passing ability. Mensah is not that type of player at all, he's not experienced enough & has never shown he'd be able to carry out the role. He's a defender who can play in midfield if required.Mensah will get stuck in and control the tempo. He can be our Matic.