prarek
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Messages
- 8,636
LOL. Wilshere isn't even on the same level as Koke. What madness.I'm saying Wilshere is an equivalent player to someone like Koke.
LOL. Wilshere isn't even on the same level as Koke. What madness.I'm saying Wilshere is an equivalent player to someone like Koke.
It's the only barometer for mid-table quality control and much better than saying team A is better because they spent 30 million more than team B.
I think Liverpool are about par with Villarreal in terms of quality which was evidenced by their encounter, Dortmund are better than Liverpool but were truly terrible for 30 minutes on the day and are a bit tactically naive. It's not really about one off games but the fact that the competition has gone for a very long time and English sides have not been competitive in it while Spanish teams have been winning it and getting very far consistently.
Using one-off matches is inherently flawed, whether that logic is used by you, or others.This is how this thread goes:
Twigg: I don't think the Europa League or Champions league is a valid way of comparing teams. Here is why (With quotes from Mourinho and Bale to back me up)
Others: Ok, but what about THIS match? And these matches?
Twigg: Fair enough, but I don't think that those should count. BTW, using your logic Liverpool are better than Dortmund and Villareal. Man City are on the same level as Barcelona.
Others: Ugh, you just said we COULDN'T use the Europa league, HYPOCRITE!
Well then what does Tottenham's efforts in it this year show? Because like other English teams before them they rested a lot of their key players and went out wanting to focus on the league.
It isn't six massive organisations? Arsenal stand still for 10 years now, they didn't feck up, they didn't get worse or better. They do the same every year. Spurs improved a bit, Liverpool was in turmoil, focused on cups but came short in the end. I wouldn't even say City fecked up that much, the players just lacked determination in the league, but they did surprisingly well in Europe, better than ever before. They reached their minimum goals without putting too much effort in and are probably looking forward to the exciting future under Guardiola."top teams collectively fecked up" - Don't believe that either sorry. I can see that is how you can spin it, but I can't see that six major massive organisations just fecked up at once. Don't think that would be the case.
BTW - I'm nominating this for thread of the year in the Redcafe awards. Can't wait till someone leaves Villareal for Bournemouth this summer.
That's not possible. A 30 million player is always better than a 5 million one.Yep for €30m to be replaced by a superior €5m player who will join Liverpool for €45m in two years to be replaced by a superior €6m punt.
That's not possible. A 30 million player is always better than a 5 million one.
Ah yes, the poster who claimed that Stoke were putting themselves into a financial black hole by signing Imbula. How are you do.ob?
As Bournemouth get relegated and Villarral continue to compete for European places....Yep for €30m to be replaced by a superior €5m player who will join Liverpool for €45m in two years to be replaced by a superior €6m punt.
Of course, he'll get better by virtue of being more expensive. Like Sterling became this season after his transferEven when it's the same person?
I'd like this too. However I expect what will actually happen is that transfer fees increase exponentially for the same quality of players as before, because that's always been the case in the PL.I am hopeful that over the next 1-3 years the PL actually makes use of it's wealth and the top teams (hopefully United the most) rise as they really should. Would make for a better league if you have 3 proper top class teams.
It will inevitably happen. It is almost impossible to foresee top English clubs run forever by imbeciles.I am hopeful that over the next 1-3 years the PL actually makes use of it's wealth and the top teams (hopefully United the most) rise as they really should. Would make for a better league if you have 3 proper top class teams.
True. The PL transfers are spiraling out of control. And while we have raised the price for young gems with the Martial transfer, the whole league has gone bonkers with spending good money on really average footballers.I'd like this too. However I expect what will actually happen is that transfer fees increase exponentially for the same quality of players as before, because that's always been the case in the PL.
I'd say Spanish and German teams and watering their mouths at how much money the likes of Stoke and West Ham are going to pay for their players now.
Players like Son going for £27m is about to become the norm.
Sniff. *slow clap*But football is so much more than big names and big transfer fees. It's about the collective. It's about the system. It's about a tactic that defeats the other team's tactic. It's about everything encompassed all together which is defined in performances.
The majority of players at English clubs either stay in the league or are on such high wages that the clubs can't get rid of them for profitable transfers (unless they want to go to China now). That's another big problem that makes it difficult for English clubs to operate the same way as other leagues. If Sevilla takes a chance at a player who doesn't work out, they can still sell him to a market that pays the same or more for similar talent. English clubs can't do that. If Liverpool buys a similar player and he flops, they're stuck with him, because he's instantly on wages no other club will pay. It's why you see so many loan deals of older players often with the English club susbidising the wages at the player's new club. It's the only way to get at least a part of his wages off the books. These transfer failures cost English clubs a big chunk of their financial advantage.English clubs rarely makes profit on their signings, does that mean that players leave England worse than they were or that they weren't good in the first place?
I hope so.True. The PL transfers are spiraling out of control. And while we have raised the price for young gems with the Martial transfer, the whole league has gone bonkers with spending good money on really average footballers.
I do see teams getting it right though. Maybe not throughout the league; teams have lots of money and are under pressure to spend it without seemingly having the intelligence to spend it well. But at least the top 3. With Pep, Mourinho (hopefully) and Conte possibly sorting out their 3 teams, and Wenger, Klopp and Pocehttino, continuing doing what they're doing, it could make for a tasty top 3/4 sides.
The majority of players at English clubs either stay in the league or are on such high wages that the clubs can't get rid of them for profitable transfers (unless they want to go to China now). That's another big problem that makes it difficult for English clubs to operate the same way as other leagues. If Sevilla takes a chance at a player who doesn't work out, they can still sell him to a market that pays the same or more for similar talent. English clubs can't do that. If Liverpool buys a similar player and he flops, they're stuck with him, because he's instantly on wages no other club will pay. It's why you see so many loan deals of older players often with the English club susbidising the wages at the player's new club. It's the only way to get at least a part of his wages off the books. These transfer failures cost English clubs a big chunk of their financial advantage.
Shaqiri is "okay" and you'd rather have a 29 year old Nabil El Zhar (spent five years in the Prem doing nothing) playing for them.
And there's a good chance that they would be highly motivated to make it at an elite level while many of the average players coming in from abroad look happy to take the paycheck without actually putting maximum effort in. It's a problem, no doubt. It probably starts with so many foreign owners who often prefer the quick fix over the better longterm solution and don't have any interest in developing the domestic talents.I really don't understand why the clubs act that way, I'm fairly sure that the PL could replace a good part of the average players with the young english talents who are rotting in Championship or league one.
Yeah. I'd say they're of an equivalent quality to Kane and Wilshere.
I'm saying Wilshere is an equivalent player to someone like Koke.
And there's a good chance that they would be highly motivated to make it at an elite level while many of the average players coming in from abroad look happy to take the paycheck without actually putting maximum effort in. It's a problem, no doubt. It probably starts with so many foreign owners who often prefer the quick fix over the better longterm solution and don't have any interest in developing the domestic talents.
Also a good point. I think they A) buy players for exorbitant fees and B) don't use them well.I don't think the PL buys mediocre players, they're just really badly managed. Standards are low in the PL in terms of performance. No way should Newcastle with the likes of Wijnaldum, Mitrovic, Sissoko and Thauvin relegate, yet they did.
Cheers. Sounds like something out of Football Braveheart.Sniff. *slow clap*
True.I hope so.
I think what this Twigginater chap is forgetting at times is that most of us (I think) actually want the PL to be the superior league to La Liga. This isn't an argument based out of favouritism towards La Liga. For me it's actually born out of frustration that the PL has declined so massively in the last 5-6 years despite all the money being pumped into it. So many bad decisions, poor transfer policies and a lack of quality coaching on a basic level at clubs. I watch the PL far more than any other league, every game I can, whereas La Liga is more of a "I'm not doing anything this evening, may as well throw it on". He on the other hand seems to have a blind bias towards the PL because he loves it so much that he refuses to acknowledge that some other league somewhere else might be better.
Are they also known as Seville?Seville
I often make that mistake.Are they also known as Seville?
To be fair, he hasn't been that good at Stoke too (for a large number of games).Shaqiri was not good enough for Bayern, not good enough for Inter, and is a star player at Stoke!
He is rellevant only in your head because he played for Bayern.
To be fair, he hasn't been that good at Stoke too (for a large number of games).
He's just an another player who was labelled for great things, but never managed to achieve them. Of course he played at Bayern, cost a lot, gets a lot of money in wages so by default that makes him better than any player in Spain outside of the big 2 or 3. In Twigginater's head, of course.
To be fair, he hasn't been that good at Stoke too (for a large number of games).
He's just an another player who was labelled for great things, but never managed to achieve them. Of course he played at Bayern, cost a lot, gets a lot of money in wages so by default that makes him better than any player in Spain outside of the big 2 or 3. In Twigginater's head, of course.
Considering that it has been going for years, I think that he isn't trolling.I'm just not sure yet if he really thinks what he writes, or is it just trolling. There's just too much effort from him to be doing it for fun.
I wouldn't want to live in that head.
My thoughts exactly. Some people have a predetermined conclusion on this question and no amount of facts can shake them from that belief. Must work for the Premier League's communications office or something of the like.I'm amazed that this is stil going.
My thoughts exactly. Some people have a predetermined conclusion on this question and no amount of facts can shake them from that belief. Must work for the Premier League's communications office or something of the like.
The same Mourinho who said La Liga is the best league in the world yet you still ignore it.Pretty much yes.
When people like Gareth Bale and Jose Mouronho are saying the same thing people still put their hands in their ears and ignore it.