R.N7
Such tagline. Wow!
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2007
- Messages
- 35,658
- Supports
- a wife, three kids and Eboue
One of the best examples of british filmmaking!Fish Tank: Brilliant film. It all felt so real and the story was heart wrenching.
Agreed. So busy with the gimmick of filming over a period of 10 years that he forgot to add a decent story to it.Boyhood gets a big meh from me. I thought it was admirable piece of filmmaking and meditation on the quick passing of time but I can't really recall a single particularly memorable or poignant scene during it's almost 3 hour running length. I know there probably was a point in showing the unspectacular yet formative moments but I thought Linklater was just going through the motions most of the time. The two drunken stepdads and the Mexican restaurant guy were pretty cringe.
That is a good question.What was the 2 for out of interest?
It's really good.Fish Tank: Brilliant film. It all felt so real and the story was heart wrenching.
Whats up with this amateur actres who played the girl? She was awesome with Fassbender. Did she act in other films yet?It's really good.
Interestingly enough, or not, my two favourite British coming of age films were both directed by women, Fish Tank (Andrea Arnold) & Ratcatcher (Lynne Ramsay).
Really looking forward to Arnold's American Honey.
One of the best examples of british filmmaking!
Seems like she had two kids and have only acted sporadically since then.Whats up with this amateur actres who played the girl? She was awesome with Fassbender. Did she act in other films yet?
Loved the authentic style of the movie. Truly a visit to a british social milieu. And the music was great too.
I still contend it's an astonishing achievement in filmmaking and will be Linklaters epitaph. So many moments of actual life in it. It's art because it reflects real life in a way very few films ever have. I saw it with a guy who's as far from a cinephile as you could imagine and he was speechless. Maybe it speaks to a narrow view of childhood that I inhabit but given it's reception I'm not even sure that's true.Boyhood gets a big meh from me. I thought it was admirable piece of filmmaking and meditation on the quick passing of time but I can't really recall a single particularly memorable or poignant scene during it's almost 3 hour running length. I know there probably was a point in showing the unspectacular yet formative moments but I thought Linklater was just going through the motions most of the time. The two drunken stepdads and the Mexican restaurant guy were pretty cringe.
Ah ok.Seems like she had two kids and have only acted sporadically since then.
It was real and everything but that wasn't really enough for me, great but at the same time bland filmmaking.I still contend it's an astonishing achievement in filmmaking and will be Linklaters epitaph. So many moments of actual life in it. It's art because it reflects real life in a way very few films ever have. I saw it with a guy who's as far from a cinephile as you could imagine and he was speechless. Maybe it speaks to a narrow view of childhood that I inhabit but given it's reception I'm not even sure that's true.
Linklater has always let form follow function, which is refreshing in the age of Inarittu.It was real and everything but that wasn't really enough for me, great but at the same time bland filmmaking.
True. He's no Mike Leigh though when it comes to slice of life dissecting.Linklater has always let form follow function, which is refreshing in the age of Inarittu.
Locke - Probably would have worked better as some sort of radio drama. I wouldn't say it was bad but I've already forgotten most of it as I'm typing this.
Someday I'd like to see Tom Hardy play a normal role with his own voice and appearance.
Or own accent, rather.I assumed he was doing just that in Locke
I thought The Lobster was shit. Really, really shit. Very disappointed. I should have seen it coming though as I thought Dogtooth was pants as well.
I really struggled my way through it. My friends loved it and I can't for the life of me figure out why. It was pretty stylish, but apart from another nice Olivia Colman performance the whole thing felt contrived.
I watched They Live for the first time recently. It was great! The ending was a bit anticlimactic, though I can't imagine how it could've been done effectively all things considered.
I assumed he was doing just that in Locke
Saw Girl on the train on Friday, it was truly awful and comical. The first half was like a soft porno and the whole plot was a mess. It had some really funny moments which I don't think were meant to be a funny. It had a decent twist towards the end which made it a little interesting at least. We were also high when we watched it so it made it more bearable. 4/10!
I was hugely disappointed, I like the 1st one and this could've been so much better , I was asked why I gave it 2/10 and to be honest I can find no reason, going to change it to 0/10.Independence day: Resurgence | http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1628841/?ref_=nv_sr_3
I want to die.
0/10
I was asked why I gave it 2/10 and to be honest I can find no reason, going to change it to 0/10Star Trek Beyond
It was not what I expected, its was not the huge blockbuster I thought it would be , it was more like a feature length episode.
The motorcycles and loud music , is not Star Trek, found it a bit silly. there was no real plot, if it was an ep in the series this would be just a filler, you watch and enjoy it but an hour later you have forgotten about it.
On saying that, I enjoyed it, it was typical Star Trek, the cast did their roles prefect , they make a good team.
This for me was the weakest out of the 3 reboot films, lets hope they make a better job of the next one.
6/10
Independence Day: Resurgence
I liked the first one and despite the bad reviews on here and elsewhere I was expecting something pretty decent.
OMG how wrong was I , if I did not know better, I would've thought this was made by Asylum for the Sci-Fi Channel.
This has to rank as one of the worst sequels EVER.
The next one and there will be a next one , has to be better than this pile of steaming dog turd.
2/10
Saw Girl on the train on Friday, it was truly awful and comical. The first half was like a soft porno and the whole plot was a mess. It had some really funny moments which I don't think were meant to be a funny. It had a decent twist towards the end which made it a little interesting at least. We were also high when we watched it so it made it more bearable. 4/10!
A most violent coat.Spider - I wanted to like this, interesting theme but it was such an austere execution with lifeless paper thin characters. Miranda Richardson did really well in her role though. Has Gabriel Byrne ever been good in anything? I guess he was sort of okay in Millers Crossing but other than that he's been pretty uninspiring in everything I've seen him in.
A Most Violent Coat - A really classy and thoughtful slow burner. Great performance by the camel coat in the leading role, the washed-out sepia-toned cinematography was a nice way to illustrate the world as seen through the eyes of the coat. The ending was a bit meh.
The coat (left), the hot wig (right)
The trailer looked a bit racey, the book was nothing like that and actually very good. What a shame they've ballsed up the film. Is it set in America?
Probably because it all sorted itself out rather smoothly.In coat we trust!
I actually don't recall how the film ended.
His hair is pretty magnificent too.Probably because it all sorted itself out rather smoothly.
It reminded me a bit of Serpico, not because of the setting or the Isaac/Pacino comparison but because I also spent most of that film transfixed with the leading character's wardrobe.