Film The Redcafe Movie review thread

I seen The Bay and thought it was definitely up there as one of the better FF films. I have Jeruzalem but not seen it yet.

Have you tried [REC], [REC2] (both spanish versions), Troll Hunter, Grave Encounters, Chronicle, VHS 2, The Poughkeepsie Tapes, The Sacrament, Afflicted or As Above So Below? These are all really good found footage films worth checking out.

Yeah, I forgot about [REC] 1-2 when I posted this. They are really up there, nearly as good as Cloverfield. I actually liked [REC] 4 as well, but not the travesty that was [REC] 3. As Above So Below was also okay. Troll Hunter was okay and quite fun for me to watch since the the movie and the whole Trolls mythology is Norwegian.

Currently IMDB'ing the other recommendations there.

Edit: Acquiring V\H\S 2 and first and foremost the Poughkeepsie tapes, I do love serial killer flicks.

After looking up a few of the others I realized that I have seen a lot of them, but just forgot. I seldom remember movies more than 6months - 1 year.
 
Last edited:
Planet of the apes (1968) Classic, first time I had seen it, strong social commentary and philosophical questions are asked, even if the acting is somewhat melodramatic. 9/10

Self/less (2015) Superb premise, great opening with ben kingsley but just like limitless and the adjustment bureau it forgets asking the important questions and instead goes into a chase movie for absolutely no reason except surely assuming people only like films when there are guns and stuff, having said that it is of a similar quality to both of them so not sure why so poorly received (5/10)

Trainwreck (2015) Amy schumer being amy schumer, really enjoyable film to be fair, easy way to kill two hours and have a few laughs, bit of a weak ending. (7/10)
 
Jeruzalem (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4552524/?ref_=nv_sr_1)

A new take on the hand-cam \ found footage films with Google Glasses being involved. It centers around two American tourists going to Israel for a vacation and ending up in some sort of biblical apocalypse. Quite good a for a low budget horror and probably one of the better takes I have seen on the genre. 5/10

The Bay (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1713476/)

Yet another found footage film. About a chemical spill \ ecological disaster in a coastal American town in Maryland. This one is also quite good and one of the better found footage films I have seen, I like how it is made up sort of like a mockumentary. I also like that the horror aspect isn't totally unbelievable and something that in a toned down version you actually could see happening. 6,5/10

@Dirty Schwein and @pauldyson1uk , I think you guys will like these two.

Edit: The reason for the low grades is that I really dont like found-footage and handheld cam movies. Only really good one that comes to mind is Cloverfield. I hated Blair Witch and all the other ones.
Not really into FF films, only one liked was Cloverfield , but I do have both sat on my HDD, nights this week so both will get watched. Blair witch for me is in the top 10 of worst films.
 
I seen The Bay and thought it was definitely up there as one of the better FF films. I have Jeruzalem but not seen it yet.

Have you tried [REC], [REC2] (both spanish versions), Troll Hunter, Grave Encounters, Chronicle, VHS 2, The Poughkeepsie Tapes, The Sacrament, Afflicted or As Above So Below? These are all really good found footage films worth checking out.
I have watch all of those, apart from The Poughkeepsie Tapes, will check it out.
 
The Panic Button

Jo, Max, Gwen and Dave win the competition.Then they head off on an all expenses paid trip to New York, courtesy of the social network. As they board the private jet, they are asked to relinquish their mobile phones and take part in the in-flight entertainment - a new online gaming experience.

It was better than I thought it would be, it had it moments, a bit Sawish but without the blood, let down by a terrible ending.

4/10
 
The Other Side Of The Door
Went into this with the lowest of expectations and after a predictable start, it was going ok but then Sarah Wayne Callis (who plays a moron in every film/tv show) becomes a moron and the film just falls into a black hole of genre tropes and jump scares. The film had a good setting (India) but it was completely wasted 4/10
 
Watched Once Upon a Time In America recently. Very good and underrated film.
 
Unknown maybe, but anyone who watches this will rate it highly, unless of course they have very bad taste.

did you watched the 251min long one? masterpiece.
Yes. I heard the studios butchered it though.

I meant underrated in that it isn't as well known as other classics of the same genre.
 
I have not seen this, worth sitting for nearly 4 hours for?

Worth it for the score alone. Not really your conventional 'rise and fall' gangster movie, but very captivating.
 
Olympus has Fallen was on TV tonight thought I would watch it again before watching London as Fallen, this was my review last time, to be honest I enjoyed it better the second time round, I may of been a bit harsh the first time.

This is not just a bad film , it is a very bad film.
An action film, which is just so predictable, you know what is coming way before you see it on the screen, when Butler said he was going to put a knife in Kang's brain, you knew he would do it.
Eckhart is the worst actor I have seen playing an American President, no presence and just plodded out the expected speech at the end, Freeman's worst film for me , he was like a rabbit caught in the headlights of the car about to flatten him.
Gerard Butler was the only decent thing in the film, he played his part well, even with the cheesy lines.
Some parts were so boring they could not keep me awake, I had to rewind in a couple of places to catch up.
If you want to watch an action film , watch a decent one, not this one.

2/10 second time 3/10

London has Fallen

As action films go , it had it all bombs , death fighting, buildings getting blown up and the hero that saves the man, but the plot was just stupid, way to many holes in it.
I love action films , but this just left me wanting.
Was not any better or worse that Olympus has Fallen, basically the same story.
The only good thing about both films was Gerard Butler.

3/10

 
Only Pauldy could decide to watch the sequel of a movie he didn't like, after going back to confirm he definitely thought the first one was shit.:lol:
 
The Bay.

Chaos breaks out in a small Maryland town after an ecological disaster occurs.
A very believable film, something that could actually happen.
One of the better found footage films I have seen.
Definitely worth a watch.

6/10
 
Never understood why he tried to rape his girlfriend.
I don't know. I think it was due to him being changed by the gangster lifestyle where he just took whatever he wanted. He raped that woman a couple of scenes earlier and was cheered on by everybody. He obviously thought he could do it with the other girl and she would be fine with it.
 
I was put off by the length of Once Upon a Time in America, but when you watch it the time flies.

Very good film, one of my favourite gangster films along with Bronx Tale and the first Godfather.
 
True Story

Jonah Hill is a journalist for the New York Times and wants to write a book about a guy (James Franco) who was alleged to have murdered his wife and kids. He slowly falls under the spell of the accused, leading him to think maybe he didn't do it.

It's crap. It's only about 75-80 minutes long, if you don't count the opening and closing credits, and it feels like a fair bit of the story ended up on the cutting room floor, because it's pretty empty. I didn't think Hill carried any sort of air about him that made me think he was a journalist. I almost expected him to snigger and show that he'd drawn a cock in the scene where him and Franco were doing that psychotherapy word association game. He's just Jonah Hill. He's his usual deadpan self, which is a great setup when he's the straight man in a comedy, but just doesn't work in this, which is supposed to be a psychological thriller type of film.

Franco is marginally better, but, again, just doesn't really carry the weight of such an intense character. The guy killed his wife and kids, put them into suitcases and threw them into rivers 15 miles apart. Then claimed that it was his wife who killed the kids and that he caught her doing it and killed her in a fit of rage. He manages to make the journalist doubt his guilt. The journalist had all sorts of conversations, tape recordings, interviews and correspondence with the killer and was approached by the prosecution to give them it so that he could be convicted, but the journalist doesn't, because deep down he wants to believe that the guy is innocent. It's a great story. It deserves to be told in a compelling way. But not by these two idiots, who are only good for yarns about riotous frat parties.

Give it a miss. 3/10
 
This, on the making of Commando, is brilliant. :lol:

A major reason for Commando’s cult status is Vernon Wells’ jaw-dropping performance as arch-villain Bennett. Once a soldier in Matrix’s unit, Bennett is now obsessed with annihilating his former compadre. On paper he’s just another rent-a-goon, but Wells attacks the role with such unhinged zeal that each line becomes an inadvertent comedy classic. He’s become the focus of an entire sub-culture of Commando fans, not least because of his eccentric wardrobe choices: fingerless gloves, tight leather trousers and a chainmail wifebeater.

Commando-03.jpg


More:
http://www.liverpoolway.co.uk/index.php?/topic/103241-commando/page-2#entry4499629
 
The Robocop remake is actually worse than I remembered from the plane. So flat, humourless and sanitised.
 
Crank High Voltage

What a crazy film, but I loved it.
What more do you want fighting , blood, sex and some humor.
Jason Statham was brilliant and the sex scene at the racecourse was better than the one n the first film.

10/10 just for the sheer craziness.
 
10 Cloverfield Road

For me a film very much of 2 parts, the first 80 mins was very good, plenty of suspense and John Goodman was excellent,very creepy.
Mary Winsted was also very good , but Jon Gallagher was a waste of time , added nothing for me.
Then she escaped and the film fell apart, the whole monster from space thing was lame , very lame. Pretty well set up for a sequel, but why put the reference to Cloverfield in there? Nothing what so ever to do with the first film.

7/10 for the first 80 mins
1/10 for the rest of the film.
 
Crank High Voltage

What a crazy film, but I loved it.
What more do you want fighting , blood, sex and some humor.
Jason Statham was brilliant and the sex scene at the racecourse was better than the one n the first film.

10/10 just for the sheer craziness.

I agree.
 
True Story

Jonah Hill is a journalist for the New York Times and wants to write a book about a guy (James Franco) who was alleged to have murdered his wife and kids. He slowly falls under the spell of the accused, leading him to think maybe he didn't do it.

It's crap. It's only about 75-80 minutes long, if you don't count the opening and closing credits, and it feels like a fair bit of the story ended up on the cutting room floor, because it's pretty empty. I didn't think Hill carried any sort of air about him that made me think he was a journalist. I almost expected him to snigger and show that he'd drawn a cock in the scene where him and Franco were doing that psychotherapy word association game. He's just Jonah Hill. He's his usual deadpan self, which is a great setup when he's the straight man in a comedy, but just doesn't work in this, which is supposed to be a psychological thriller type of film.

Franco is marginally better, but, again, just doesn't really carry the weight of such an intense character. The guy killed his wife and kids, put them into suitcases and threw them into rivers 15 miles apart. Then claimed that it was his wife who killed the kids and that he caught her doing it and killed her in a fit of rage. He manages to make the journalist doubt his guilt. The journalist had all sorts of conversations, tape recordings, interviews and correspondence with the killer and was approached by the prosecution to give them it so that he could be convicted, but the journalist doesn't, because deep down he wants to believe that the guy is innocent. It's a great story. It deserves to be told in a compelling way. But not by these two idiots, who are only good for yarns about riotous frat parties.

Give it a miss. 3/10

Watched this on a flight from Warsaw to Frankfurt. I think there is potentially a great story there. A charismatic killer and a disgraced writer is a nice combination but just wasn't handled in a believable way.

10 Cloverfield Road

For me a film very much of 2 parts, the first 80 mins was very good, plenty of suspense and John Goodman was excellent,very creepy.
Mary Winsted was also very good , but Jon Gallagher was a waste of time , added nothing for me.
Then she escaped and the film fell apart, the whole monster from space thing was lame , very lame. Pretty well set up for a sequel, but why put the reference to Cloverfield in there? Nothing what so ever to do with the first film.

7/10 for the first 80 mins
1/10 for the rest of the film.

The turning point in the film is exactly where the bigger studio tacked on the ending to connect it to the Cloverfield universe. prior to this it was intended as a self contained film with no extra-terrestrial resolution.
 
True Story

Jonah Hill is a journalist for the New York Times and wants to write a book about a guy (James Franco) who was alleged to have murdered his wife and kids. He slowly falls under the spell of the accused, leading him to think maybe he didn't do it.

It's crap. It's only about 75-80 minutes long, if you don't count the opening and closing credits, and it feels like a fair bit of the story ended up on the cutting room floor, because it's pretty empty. I didn't think Hill carried any sort of air about him that made me think he was a journalist. I almost expected him to snigger and show that he'd drawn a cock in the scene where him and Franco were doing that psychotherapy word association game. He's just Jonah Hill. He's his usual deadpan self, which is a great setup when he's the straight man in a comedy, but just doesn't work in this, which is supposed to be a psychological thriller type of film.

Franco is marginally better, but, again, just doesn't really carry the weight of such an intense character. The guy killed his wife and kids, put them into suitcases and threw them into rivers 15 miles apart. Then claimed that it was his wife who killed the kids and that he caught her doing it and killed her in a fit of rage. He manages to make the journalist doubt his guilt. The journalist had all sorts of conversations, tape recordings, interviews and correspondence with the killer and was approached by the prosecution to give them it so that he could be convicted, but the journalist doesn't, because deep down he wants to believe that the guy is innocent. It's a great story. It deserves to be told in a compelling way. But not by these two idiots, who are only good for yarns about riotous frat parties.

Give it a miss. 3/10

Seems like you're very biased against Hill and Franco. I thought it was well acted and a good movie.
 
Yeah I agree with Badunk. Franco was about ok, his performance lacked depth but it wasn't too bad, but Hill was dreadful.

And it could've been a good film but ultimately fell short, I thought.