The Reservoir Dogs creator must be seething.The Hateful Eight is a rip off of Reservoir Dogs.
The Reservoir Dogs creator must be seething.The Hateful Eight is a rip off of Reservoir Dogs.
The Hateful Eight is a rip off of Reservoir Dogs
Jules bible speech was stolen from a movie.
It's not a homage, it's a 'omaaaage.That's a homeage, everyone and their dog knows it's Bruce Lee's homage, he even admitted so.
Besides, most movies are stealing something from other movies
It stops becoming an homage when your whole movie is made up of "homages" to other films.That's a homeage, everyone and their dog knows it's Bruce Lee's homage, he even admitted so.
Besides, most movies are stealing something from other movies
Everyone says this, but I'm not sure it really shares that many story elements with Dogs, other than it being largely set in one place and everyone trying to kill each other. It's more a sort of cowboy mash up of And Then There Were None and The Thing.
Now that was a rip. From Karate Kiba aka The Bodyguard.
I know Django Unchained was stealing/homaging Django but this is better than both and I will use every opportunity I can to promote it
Oh it's real alright! and It was on Netflix (not sure if it still is) and was called "Boss"I had to google , just to make sure it was a real film.
@Mockney's favorite film
I know Django Unchained was stealing/homaging Django but this is better than both and I will use every opportunity I can to promote it
Yeah your right. Just feels odd that after years of giving him credit for certain iconic scenes(like the stand off scene in Reservoir Dogs or the speech in Pulp Fiction)so to know now that's it's just a rip off(And in the case of Reservoir Dogs almost like for like in some parts)does tarnish my view of the films.He doesn't get more shit for it because the stuff he rips off generally isn't very well known. He basically plunders niche movie and TV for ideas like a hip hop producer sources samples from old records. He's the J Dilla of cinema. And he'd probably love that title too.
Pan is an insult to the memory of Hook. Rufio would be spinning backwards in his grave.
The Lobster - 8. Fun and interesting, but it loses it's way about 2/3rds in. It's biggest achievement is managing to be quite sweet and involving despite assembling an A list (well, B+) cast of actors and then instructing them to not act under any circumstances.
Deadpool - 8. Fun and interesting, but it loses it's way about 2/3rds in. It's biggest achievement is managing to be quite sweet and involving despite assembling an A (well, B+) list of dirty jokes and instructing everyone involved to not take it seriously under any circumstances.
That's pretty good, Mockney, although I'd say Lobster pulls it back with its finale. Definitely loses a bit in the woods though. And I think Deadpool was a victim of its budget. Its finale is seriously small time in this day and age.
Just watched There Will Be Blood. Day-Lewis is mesmerising, to the point where you could stick him in a room full of stupid shit and make a film out of him acting around them.
No. There was a coherent story and other actors. I don't know what films you're watching.That is exactly what happened isn't it? After all he is an ACTOOR
No I don't think that's the overarching theme. The battle between religion takes place within the wider themes of the film but it's never really a battle. Religion is shown as a fraudulent cover for Plainview and Eli but it's never shown as a match for his brutal, exceptional ambition.Despite asking before, nobody's answered my question about There Will Be Blood: is the film's overall theme really as simplistic - even if true - as "the battle for America's soul has always been the battle of religion v money"?
I'd say it's intended to be a character study first and foremost, with Plainview then being the embodiment of the incredibly fast and brutal growth of capitalism in America at the start of the 20th century. How you see his 'use' of religion can then be interpreted in a few different ways. There was a lot of discussion when the film came out if it was supposed to be an allegorical tale of the Iraq war, where his deception of using religion to ensure the town behaved as he needed it to being the equivalent of Bush's "god told me to end the tyranny in Iraq" excuse for war. I think that's a bit of a stretch, but it's interesting to consider.Despite asking before, nobody's answered my question about There Will Be Blood: is the film's overall theme really as simplistic - even if true - as "the battle for America's soul has always been the battle of religion v money"?
No. There was a coherent story and other actors. I don't know what films you're watching.
You think everything's terrible Wibble. Except Star Wars.Less hammy ones. Let There Be Blood was a terrible film. Nearly as terrible as Gangs of New York or The Departed
You think everything's terrible Wibble. Except Star Wars.
Dilla had soul, Tarantino's just juvenile and crass.He doesn't get more shit for it because the stuff he rips off generally isn't very well known. He basically plunders niche movie and TV for ideas like a hip hop producer sources samples from old records. He's the J Dilla of cinema. And he'd probably love that title too.
It's hard to notice anything else when there's a big ham stinking up the place, but if you actually try you'll see it's an empty, empty film.
The film has plenty to say. Not much heart but that's the point.It's hard to notice anything else when there's a big ham stinking up the place, but if you actually try you'll see it's an empty, empty film.
Just watched There Will Be Blood. Day-Lewis is mesmerising, to the point where you could stick him in a room full of stupid shit and make a film out of him acting around them.
The film itself was very unnerving.
I'd say it's intended to be a character study first
Yeah. Didn't like the soundtrack.Add to that the loud & over the top soundtrack.