Why does Johnny Depp keep getting acting work? What's he been decent in recently?
Was a bit better in Black Mass, well sort of. At least he didn't play the exact same dude again. Maybe he sobered up a bit.
Why does Johnny Depp keep getting acting work? What's he been decent in recently?
Not something you'd usually associate with Kaufman.
He was really good when he played.... Tim Burton
Never watched it because... Honestly, jet pack ski's sound so shit.Jupiter Ascending.
Woeful. Shit. Long. Daft. Fit.
I wish I could see what the people who pulled the force awakens to pieces thought of it.
2.3/12
I never read that in the synopsis!Never watched it because... Honestly, jet pack ski's sound so shit.
He's probably the highest paid actor in Hollywood. That somewhat correlates with the type of movie he's in.Why does Johnny Depp keep getting acting work? What's he been decent in recently?
Room
Betting on Brie Larson to win the Oscar this year won't be stupid. A good movie, some might say one of the better ones this year. As good as Brie is in it, it all comes down to the kid being able to do a good job since he's got such a prominent role and I think he doe.
Easiest acting gig William H. Macy has done.
Anomalisa - It was sort of good, predictable and unenjoyable at the same time.
Barton Fink - Way better than I remember it being. Great, great writing.
Never watched it because... Honestly, jet pack ski's sound so shit.
The Look Of Silence - A guy goes around interviewing the people responsible for his brothers death in the 60s Indonesian genocide. Immensely well crafted and worth a couple of hours of anyones time.
Morena Baccarin is smoking hot 9/10
Who does she play in Gotham?She's probably the only reason I've stuck with Gotham.
(And Huntress, now).
The doctor. Doctor Lee I think.Who does she play in Gotham?
Yes. Gordon's squeeze.The doctor. Doctor Lee I think.
Mirror becomes a lot more accessible when you view it as a collection of memories (his family memories with the backdrop early 20th century Russia in this case). The rest of his films share a lot of themes with Russian literature, so reading a few books and plays by people like Dostoevsky, Tolstoy and Chekhov helps. And he bloody well knew how to make a film, so even if you don't they're still really really good. There's a great documentary called One Day in the Life of Andrei Arsenevich which makes great viewing if you're watching his films. It explores his life and the themes in his work.The Mirror (1975)
First venture into Tarkovsky's work. Thought it was really interesting. Probably didn't get a lot of the more artsy stuff, but it's got some lovely scenery and is very well shot too as it attempts to deal with life/death etc. I'll probably try some more Tarkovsky stuff at some point, was a challenging film but worth the watch.
BarbYes. Gordon's squeeze.
I prefer the blonde from Gotham, though.
Mirror becomes a lot more accessible when you view it as a collection of memories (his family memories with the backdrop early 20th century Russia in this case). The rest of his films share a lot of themes with Russian literature, so reading a few books and plays by people like Dostoevsky, Tolstoy and Chekhov helps. And he bloody well knew how to make a film, so even if you don't they're still really really good. There's a great documentary called One Day in the Life of Andrei Arsenevich which makes great viewing if you're watching his films. It explores his life and the themes in his work.
Spotlight - I mean it's good - it's certainly a well put together movie (if not overly unspectacular) - but great? I'm not sure. It doesn't really do more then just present the take by take account of how journalist uncover the well-known church pedo cover up... and because it's so well known, I'm not entirely sure how revelatory it is... I mean, nothing new is said here, theres nothing done to flesh out any characters, and whilst the subject matter in itself is interesting, I'm not sure presenting it in this manner - just because the scandal was so huge and horrifying - makes this a great movie. The performances are all decent, but nothing mind-blowing. I mean feck knows why Rachel McAdams got nominated for an oscar.
How so?Couldn't disagree more. It was an excellent film, taking a relatively dry subject matter and telling it brilliantly. The understated direction was exactly what a film like this required, and the way it handled the victims stories was quietly revolutionary, from a cinematic point of view. The fact it told a story we all knew and is still so compelling, is a credit to the writers and McCarthy.
With Anthony Hopkins, how did you feel when you actually heard him saying Hannibal's words?
'It was thrilling. It's funny, I asked him one time how he came up with his voice, and he had some bizarre answer that makes sense to him. He said, "Well, I thought it was a cross between Katharine Hepburn and the computer Hal in 2001: A Space Odyssey..."'
In the way it underplayed their pain and completely cast aside any melodrama. Nine out of ten directors would've played that for the exploitation factor, McCarthy didn't. "Revolutionary" was a bit much. I was on the sauce last night.How so?
Silence of the Lambs at 25: 'It Broke All the Rules'
For the film's 25th anniversary, Oscar-winning screenwriter Ted Tally reflects on bringing Hannibal Lecter to the big screen
http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/...-at-25-it-broke-all-the-rules-20160212?page=4
Deadpool
10 out of 10
Literally funniest fun movie I've had since along time
How was Colossus?
Silence of the Lambs at 25: 'It Broke All the Rules'
For the film's 25th anniversary, Oscar-winning screenwriter Ted Tally reflects on bringing Hannibal Lecter to the big screen
http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/...-at-25-it-broke-all-the-rules-20160212?page=4
Just a bid sad at the end that he didn't see (and couldn't comment) on the Hannibal series, because I think he would have liked how they did it
I haven't actually seen any of it yet but, from what I've read, I think the style of the series perfectly fits Harris' vision; a vision which complemented entirely the Renaissance world that Lecter was so fascinated by in Hannibal (the novel). It really was a time of great works by great minds and, somehow, the period's violence, in-fighting and pitch-blackk humour went hand-in-hand with the artistry and intelligence. In this, it's perfectly fitting for Hannibal's character, Harris' work, and the series' style.