The 'Before' trilogy is better than any of those. Only Toy Story has a claim. In all the others, at least one movie isn't up to scratch. In the 'Before' trilogy, all three movies are amazing.
Last edited:
The 'Before' trilogy is better than any of those. Only Toy Story has a claim. In all the others, at least one movie isn't up to scratch. In the 'Before' trilogy, all three movies are amazing.
Shouldn't all films of a trilogy be good to call the trilogy great? Temple of doom is an abomination, it's easily the worst Indy ever and yes that includes that hilariously bad Indy vs Aliens with crystal skulls flick they made a few years ago. I'd argue that the Indy trilogy is the one with the biggest gap in quality between the first and second film ever.
Which version did you watch? Theatrical one, or the 'extended version' on the BR/DVD? I'm only asking cos the way you're describing it isn't at all how I remember it. My recollection is a very atmospheric and tense film, very dark with an almost nihilistic feel to it. Also loved Charles Dance in it.I watched it not that long ago. Just chase chase chase without any of the redeeming qualities of the first 2. Even worse than part 4 imo.
I hadn't ever really realized that, but yeah, you're right. You've just sucked the fun out of my childhood.Yeah I like Temple. There's an argument to be made it's the only one where Indy actually does anything towards the resolution of the movie. In Raiders & Crusade the same shit would've happened without him. Probably with less fuss and casual death too.
It's got the plane raft stunt, the room with spikes, the hat grab under the door, the minecart chase, the bridge bit. To say it's worse than Crystal Skull is nonsense.
I hadn't ever really realized that, but yeah, you're right. You've just sucked the fun out of my childhood.
Yeah that I'd picked up on and it's pretty daft indeedNot only that, but in Raiders, due to an editing mistake, there's absolutely no reason why he knows not to look at the Ark. It's never mentioned at all, ever. He basically guesses and makes up a reason whilst the most literal "God in the Machine" ever takes out all the baddies for him. It's mental.
To appeal to Welsh audiences, they're the ones that dictate box office success.Why is there a Welsh Arab in Raiders? That's never explained either.
Why is there a Welsh Arab in Raiders? That's never explained either.
This just made me think, has there ever been a good low budget sequel to a film? I can't think of one.Cube 2: Hypercube
I watched this out of curiosity because I enjoyed the first so much. My expectations were low and the film didn't really change my mind. They took a decent idea from the first one but tried to over-complicate it with shifts in time-space and transportation. The film was too confusing for it's own good but once you think about it a little it's actually pretty straight forward and not as clever as it thinks. Disappointed 4/10
I think the Cube 2 was much higher budget...This just made me think, has there ever been a good low budget sequel to a film? I can't think of one.
I actually like that a lot about the films, it makes a lot of sense in the context of the whole biblical apocalypse waiting to happen scenario where no man can actually prevent it and the bad guys just need to feck it up themselves. I kinda feel like I have to rewatch the trilogy again on the weekend, I haven't watched Temple for at least 15 years, maybe I'll change my opinion afterwards.Yeah I like Temple. There's an argument to be made it's the only one where Indy actually does anything towards the resolution of the movie. In Raiders & Crusade the same shit would've happened without him. Probably with less fuss and casual death too.
Sure it's incredibly racist, but it's got the plane raft stunt, the room with spikes, the hat grab under the door, the minecart chase, the bridge bit. To say it's worse than Crystal Skull is nonsense. Harisson Ford knows where he is for a start.
Both his trilogies are exceptional, the once upon a time trilogy is in my opinion even better than the dollar trilogy.Okay, forgot about Leone's 'Dollars' trilogy. That's a big contender for best trilogy ever.
Worst ending to a film I've ever seen. Left the cinema in a rage at how insultingly stupid it was.Savages: A movie with two endings and both of them are retarded. Full of woolly minded ideas, inconsistencies and a disjointed story line; this would only be notable for its beautiful settings if it wasn't for the fact that they have somehow even managed to f**k most of that up by using a a similar "metallic" type effect on the camera/film stock to the film Traffic (a vastly superior film about roughly the same subject). A film full of dumb ideas, avoid or go one step better and avoid and watch Traffic instead.
4/10
Not only that, but in Raiders, due to an editing mistake, there's absolutely no reason why he knows not to look at the Ark. It's never mentioned at all, ever. He basically guesses and makes up a reason whilst the most literal "God in the Machine" ever takes out all the baddies for him. It's mental.
Objectively speaking, I think the three LOTR films generally hold a higher standard. There's only one truly great film in the original Star Wars trilogy (The Empire Strikes Back).Star Wars episode 4-6 or LOTR, which one is better??
A little, I actually liked the sequels when I saw them. I watched the first film a few years afterwards after having seen a few animes and I didn't enjoy it, a colossal bore.You weren't ever a Matrix geek though were you?
I'm the same a bit, I still enjoy the first one, but the sequels are soooo bad. At the time I bought in to them though.A little, I actually liked the sequels when I saw them. I watched the first film a few years afterwards after having seen a few animes and I didn't enjoy it, a colossal bore.
You liked the sequels? Wow Nilsson, wouldn't have expected that from you really!A little, I actually liked the sequels when I saw them. I watched the first film a few years afterwards after having seen a few animes and I didn't enjoy it, a colossal bore.
I was 14!You liked the sequels? Wow Nilsson, wouldn't have expected that from you really!
That's no excuse, you emo bastard.I was 14!
Worst ending to a film I've ever seen. Left the cinema in a rage at how insultingly stupid it was.
I watched it not that long ago. Just chase chase chase without any of the redeeming qualities of the first 2. Even worse than part 4 imo.
Not sure which I prefer more, the Before trilogy or Eric Rohmer's Six Moral Tales, the latter definitely must have been a huge influence on Linklater.
I probably prefer Aki Kaurismäki's Proletariat Trilogy, Wong Kar Wai’s 60's trilogy and the Die Hard trilogy over both of them though...
Oh, and Temple of Doom is horrible movie.
Shouldn't all films of a trilogy be good to call the trilogy great? Temple of doom is an abomination, it's easily the worst Indy ever and yes that includes that hilariously bad Indy vs Aliens with crystal skulls flick they made a few years ago. I'd argue that the Indy trilogy is the one with the biggest gap in quality between the first and second film ever.
Indiana Jones is the closest cinematic series to Tintin (other than Spielbergs Tintin, which was nothing like Tintin). And Tintin had it's fair share of stupidity and racism but I loved its weird made up countries and adventure.You see, I kinda love Temple of Doom because it's so ugly,crude and racist..... which is kinda in keeping with the old serials that influenced Lucas. It's messy, violent but has some of the best action sequences of the entire series. Yeah, I think it's terrific personally.