So,
Gladiator 2
There's an interesting thing that happens in everyone's life - as you get older, you seem to give less and less shits about what people think of you, how your behaviour might be perceived, your impact on others... We witness it in the streets, in the supermarket, probably at Sunday lunches at grandparents (I wouldn't know, but I've heard) - old people just don't care that much.
This is what's happening with Ridley Scott these days, and it's rather enjoyable. Once a director that was quite focused on conventional narratives, storytelling, filmmaking, and which gave us absolute classics like Alien and Blade Runner, he's decisively entered his old man phase and it shows. I loved his interpretation of Bonaparte, focusing on the most relevant part of the guy and angering all the military and history nerds (who are usually about as bad as video game nerds), and with Gladiator 2, he basically remakes the original film, but with even less care for structure, character motivation, common sense, coherence, or all those other pesky details - the shackles are absolutely off.
I rewatched Gladiator recently, and it's a really good film. It's gotten some weird backlash over the past few years, maybe because it doesn't feel like a logical Oscar-worthy film or something, but it's genuinely very good - it's a revenge flick set in ancient Rome with solid story telling, clear character motivation, great all round performances (particularly Crowe's intense interpretation which makes it all hold up) and excellent set pieces. It's not necessarily the kind of film I'd watch over and over again, but it's objectively very well made.
This one... Well, it's well made. Scott is an amazing filmmaker. But it's super messy. He clearly knows where he wants to go with it, but he doesn't really care that the journey to get there is coherent or holds up (spoilers: it doesn't, really). The motivations for most characters are blurry at best, their interactions seem forced and fake for the most part, the emotions seem more like concepts in the script than actually fleshed out on the screen, and the set pieces are... strange. The monkey scene is strange. The boat battle in the Coliseum is strange, not because of its look, but because it's cool, seems like it should be a massive set piece in the middle of the film, and then half way through the scene, it seems like Scott got bored with it and just phoned it in. In lieu of Crowe's brooding, dark rage, we get Paul Mescal's lightest performance yet (and I'm a maaaassive Mescal fan, and everything he's done so far has shown he's capable of intense brooding), with Denzel chipping in every so often to talk about his "rage" and his "mist" to let us know that Paul Mescal is, erm, super angry. Even though he actually seems like he's having a hell of a time! His character also keeps getting these revelations that are grasping at straws, putting it kindly, and gets a payoff he's not really deserved, as an on-screen character.
The most delicious part about it all is that Ridley found the perfect vessel to channel is old-man-don't-give-a-feck energy in Denzel - everyone else is playing it so straight faced, so serious, so actors have a script and actually do their job, while he's just gangstering his way through it and having a hell of a time. It's quite the sight, and he's fecking awesome.
I don't usually do ratings, but this one is a clear
we-need-to-protect-our-elders-at-all-costs-they're-national-treasures/10
Also, I'm hoping there will be a 4h director's cut version released some time down the line with Denzel's character progressively morphing into Alonzo Harris.