Film The Redcafe Movie review thread

Tenacious D - the pick of destiny

pickofdestiny-poster.jpg


Genre:Comedy / Music

Tagline:The greatest motion picture of all time.

Plot Outline:
In Venice Beach, naive Midwesterner JB bonds with local slacker KG and they form the rock band Tenacious D. Setting out to become the world's greatest band is no easy feat, so they set out to steal what could be the answer to their prayers -- a magical guitar pick housed in a rock-and-roll museum some 300 miles away

Rating : 10/10

loved it :lol:
 
Just saw Requiem For A Dream, what a brilliant movie. Probably give the movie itself around 8/10 and the score by Clint Mansell 10/10.
 
Hectic said:
Just saw Requiem For A Dream, what a brilliant movie. Probably give the movie itself around 8/10 and the score by Clint Mansell 10/10.

the movie was ok,the score was amazing but i don't get why people find this movie to be great...???
 
Varun said:
the movie was ok,the score was amazing but i don't get why people find this movie to be great...???
I loved the cinematography and the acting. Thought it was quite powerful. The score for me made the movie alot more.

Have you seen Smokin' Aces? The final track in that by Clint is unbelievable again.
 
golden_blunderi thought this movie was awful.[/QUOTE said:
You reckon?Differant strokes for differant folks I suppose.
Still, you have a moustache, making your opinion almost null and void.:)
 
saw the Departed also and agree with everything you just said.

Thought Dicapprio was outstanding as was Nicholson but the good will hunting bloke was shocking
 
RUNNING WITH SCISSORS

I've already made my feelings on memoirs known (in short: real writers make stuff up). Certain authors seem to have taken my advice to heart, notably Oprah whipping-boy James Frey; his recovery best-seller A Million Little Pieces, marketed as nonfiction, was actually a million little fabricated and embellished anecdotes. Readers understandably felt betrayed, having invested themselves in a story now stripped of its veneer of truth.

I don't like James Frey. He lied out of egotism and greed; the entire Pieces charade undermined any message of rehabilitation and redemption he may have hoped to impart. None of these things mean he is a bad writer, though - A Million Little Pieces is a terrible book for other reasons.

The Coen Brothers' Fargo begins with a title card: "This is a true story. The events depicted in this film took place in Minnesota in 1987." It's a lie; Fargo is not a true story, at least not in the factual sense. "It aims to be homey and exotic, and pretends to be true" says Ethan Coen. The title card is a stylistic device (as it always is), but it's also an ironic joke. Some people don't get the joke. These are probably the same people who read memoirs.

Running with Scissors, adapted from Augusten Burroughs' acclaimed novel, begins not with a title card but a voice over: Augusten (Joseph Cross) reflects on where the film should start. "I guess it doesn't matter where I begin," he says, "because nobody is going to believe me anyway." Speaking only for myself, he's right. I don't believe him, not necessarily because events in this motion picture did not happen to Mr. Burroughs (though this has been called into question; see below), but because they don't feel like they happened. Certainly not like this.

Augusten has a rather unconventional home life. His father (Alec Baldwin) drinks and doesn't appear to like his family very much. His mother, Deirdre (Annette Bening), is the kind of damaged, feminist housewife who names her son "Augusten." A short aside: the real-life author was born Christopher Robinson and legally changed his name at the age of eighteen. You wouldn't know this by watching the film as this creative reinvention and chosen nom de plume probably says more about Augusten than his mother; such is the manner in which the film picks and choses reality, but I digress. Moving on, Deirdre uses her child as an emotional crutch while dreaming about having her poetry published, anywhere really, but mostly in The New Yorker. She has some liberated ideas about parenting: "Augusten, please don't smoke my cigarettes. You have a pack of your own." Her son doesn't enjoy school so she doesn't make him go.

Enter Dr. Finch (Brian Cox), an eccentric, Yale-educated, and scatologically obsessed psychiatrist. He quickly ingratiates himself into the Burroughs family, first as a surrogate father and then a literal one when Deirdre signs over guardianship of Augusten after separating from her husband. "Dr. Finch is spiritually evolved," she tells her son. "We'll be safe with him." He also lives in a crumbling mansion reminiscent of Grey Gardens, painted pink with a two-year-old Christmas tree in the living room; his own family includes a wife (Jill Clayburgh) who eats kibble, a predatory gay son/mental patient (Joseph Fiennes), and two daughters (Paltrow and Wood) who attack each other with Freudian psychobabble like "you're so oral you'll never get to anal." Touché.

Writer/director Ryan Murphy is best-known for having created the television series Nip/Tuck. Clear to anyone who has seen that show, subtlety is not one of Murphy's chief strengths/interests. Here, he frequently allows his actors to go off the deep end, particularly Bening, who turns in a performance short on humanity and long on the kind of belligerent narcissism that has characterized her recent film appearances. Predictable period dressings and song choices abound; it's life as I Love the 70s episode, which is no life at all. Reminders that These Things Actually Happened become something close to a necessary evil for so little in the picture has the ring of authenticity. The author himself appears in the last frame of the picture beside his on-screen counterpart, a zenith to a Where Are They Now closing montage that's about as genuine as the end of Animal House - it's desperate, really, and no more credible than taping Grant's photo to a five-dollar-bill and calling it a fifty. How does one relate to someone that gives their child to a man who speaks openly about his own feces and masturbation habits (Finch keeps a special room he calls his "Masturbatorium"); what about the boy who stays there with relatively little complaint? It's a story populated by characters not people, all displaying wildly antisocial behaviors for the seeming purpose of giving the teenage Burroughs something to write about when older. It may be factual but it is not Truth.

Interesting footnote: An article in the January 2007 issue of Vanity Fair raises provocative questions regarding the authenticity of Running with Scissors. The Turcotte family (renamed Finch in the book) are suing the author and his publisher for libel and invasion of privacy. The suit states that Burroughs "literally has fabricated events that never happened and manufactured conversations that never occurred." They have already reached a settlement with Sony Pictures for an undisclosed amount.

http://pretentiousmusings.com/running_with_scissors.html
 
Hectic said:
Just saw Requiem For A Dream, what a brilliant movie. Probably give the movie itself around 8/10 and the score by Clint Mansell 10/10.

i find this picture suffers with repeated viewings. you're right about the score, though.
 
Angel Of Death: a 2002 offering that has only just made it to DVD here starring Mira Sorvino. It should have been great given that it was filmed in Sevilla at Easter but a nonsensical plot combined with it being filmed on a standard of camera now widely found on mobile phones spoils it utterly. 2/10 - avoid.
 
Sophie Scholl: Almost everyone who sees this film seems to love it. So why didn't I? Being a film about resistance to the Nazi's I can see why the film would be popular in Germany and given the ending (don't read the DVD sleeve if you don't like spoilers) it could have been a great film in its own right. But for me it was too wordy and showed me little or nothing of interest about Germany and the Germans at war. I suspect we have a case of The King's New Clothes. 4/10
 
festen.jpg


Festen (The Celebration)

Plot: A lodge owner's 60th birthday celebrations go horribly wrong when the eldest son makes his toast.

I really enjoyed this movie. It had the hand held camera thing going which pissed me off a couple of times but was fine otherwise. Excellent acting from Ulrich Thomsen, whoever he is. Overall a pretty good, entertaining movie.

8/10.
 
mehro said:
festen.jpg


Festen (The Celebration)

Plot: A lodge owner's 60th birthday celebrations go horribly wrong when eldest son makes his toast.

I really enjoyed this movie. It had the hand held camera thing going which pissed me off a couple of times but was fine otherwise. Excellent acting from Ulrich Thomsen, whoever he is. Overall a pretty good, entertaining movie.

8/10.


!!!

This is Festen! This is a dogme (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogme_95) film, which is partly responsible for the handheld camera. It's incredibly acted and ridiculously intense when it gets going. The dogme collective was set up by a group of Danish directers lead by Lars Von Trier, it's all about pure filmaking and no cheap tricks. There are some other great films as part of this collective, though Festen is the best.

I am very surprised this has turned up on here :D
 
recently rewatched back to the future. basically a masterpiece of popcorn escapism but also bizarrely unaware of its own slave-to-consumerism/materialism mentality.

it's also kind of funny how marty steals the genesis of rock n' roll music from black people.

i'll do a write-up of it using long, pretentious words very shotly.
 
don't know what's in the water at the usc film school. two of the big three made big buget action films (zemeckis and george lucas) where the threat of incestual romance plays a central role. the other one, spielberg, made the color purple, which is slavery, abuse and incest played partly for laughs.

strange.
 
Spammy said:
!!!

This is Festen! This is a dogme (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogme_95) film, which is partly responsible for the handheld camera. It's incredibly acted and ridiculously intense when it gets going. The dogme collective was set up by a group of Danish directers lead by Lars Von Trier, it's all about pure filmaking and no cheap tricks. There are some other great films as part of this collective, though Festen is the best.

I am very surprised this has turned up on here :D

The only Dogme effort I've seen is 'The Idiots' and I loved it. I saw a documentary about the blokes involved and they seemed quite keen to distance themselves from the notion of 'pure filmaking' and they seemed to emphasise the point that they weren't neccessarily attempting some sort of grand critique of industry trends. Which is fair enough, because I'm not sure that using ridiculous scripts and overacting is any more 'pure' than using dodgy special effects.

I reckon they just came up with a set of rules that they can use to challenge themselves, with no greater agenda.
 
back_to_the_future.jpg


BACK TO THE FUTURE

I'm tempted to call Back to the Future one of the more subversive films about the Reagan era, but that would imply intent. I honestly don't believe Robert Zemeckis really knew what he was making, so crammed as it is with mixed messages, Oedipal subtext, and nostalgic revery/wish fulfillment. He probably thought he was just making a movie, albeit one where a mother wants sex with her own son.

The year is 1985. Marty McFly (Michael J. Fox) is your average teenager in Hill Valley, California, a suburb in transition; this is to say, transitioning from a nice place to raise your kids to porno shops, homeless people, and graffiti. Marty dreams about owning a black Toyota 4X4 and playing in a band that sounds suspiciously like Huey Lewis and the News; his group, the Pinheads, auditions for a school talent competition, only to be rudely dismissed by a judge (who looks suspiciously like Huey Lewis...wait, it is Huey Lewis!) with the self-congratulatory opprobrium "I'm afraid you're just too darn loud." Marty doesn't need much to give up a dream.

He gets it from his father, George (Crispin Glover), a pathological pushover who dreamed of being an author but instead became coworker Biff Tannen's office bitch. Mom Lorraine (Lea Thompson) is a Puritan and a drunk, his sister can't get a date, and brother works at McDonald's, which is shorthand for failure. Marty seems to be the only one with an active social life, mostly spent with his girlfriend, Jennifer, and eccentric inventor Dr. Emmett L. Brown (Christopher Lloyd). Unbeknownst to Marty, Doc has been putting the finishing touches on a time machine built into a stainless steel DeLorean. It runs on plutonium (why didn't Operation Plowshare think of this?), specifically plutonium stolen from Arab terrorists. When they come looking for payback, Marty is caught in the crossfire; he escapes their bullets via the space-time continuum, all the way back to good old 1955 where coffee costs a nickel, Ronald Reagan is just an actor, and there are no Arab terrorists trying to kill you.

Much of Back to the Future concerns Marty's attempt to play matchmaker after inadvertently fouling up his parents' nascent love connection, a task complicated by Lorraine's infatuation with Marty himself. During one memorable scene, Marty wakes up in her bed sans pants; his future mother ogles him, enamored by his purple underwear. It's a sequence right out of Vertigo (after Scotty saves Judy from San Francisco Bay), gender-reversed but possessing the same awkward sexual charge. An important marker of maturity is when we begin to view our parents as people; it's jarring when Marty discovers Dad is a sex pervert and Mom is sort of a sex pervert as well. It is a testament to Zemeckis' craftsmanship that he's able to pull off such an abstraction without it being as dirty as it should be.

A short aside: two of USC's big three (Zemeckis & George Lucas) have used incest as a central conceit in their big budget coming out parties; the other (Spielberg) has made a career out of more conventional child endangerment fantasies (his lone toe-dip with incest, The Color Purple, did get him a DGA award). I'm not sure what this means.

Back to Back to the Future; as popcorn escapism, the picture is a masterpiece, but I wonder whether the film is trying to say anything. Case in point: the product placement, which is without question quite obscene. Is this a commentary on Me Generation corporate hegemonic dystopia or, well, just product placement? Likely the latter, though Reagan is name-checked at several points in the picture (as he is in the first sequel). "No wonder your President is an actor," Doc tells Marty at one point. "He has to look good on television." Not especially deep commentary, mind, but it is a political observation (likewise, Doc Brown returns from a future where oil and nuclear power have been replaced by composting). One might take it more seriously if the climactic space-time makeover of the McFly clan wasn't so thoroughly materialistic. It's not the sixties Zemeckis looks back so fondly upon but the fifties, an idealized Garden of Eden brought to an end by free love, feminism, and the civil rights movement. The Eisenhower Era is no party for future Mayor Goldie Wilson, of course, though it's worth noting that he gets his political aspirations from Marty (and administers during a time inferior to the one where he is a busboy). At least black people still have rock n' roll music, but Marty steals that from them as well.

Sly statement about white appropriation of minority culture trends? I'd wager that it isn't, but we say things even when our mouths don't move; Back to the Future is more a product of the times than a comment on them.

Interesting footnote: The atomic bomb figures prominently in earlier drafts of the Back to the Future script, where the DeLorean is replaced by a time-traveling refrigerator; to return Marty to 1985, Doc takes the refrigerator to an atomic bomb testing ground. Zemeckis and producer Spielberg feared children might lock themselves inside refrigerators, so they replaced the device with a car; however, ensuing drafts still had the car being returned to the future by atomic bomb radiation. It wasn't until late in the script's development that Zemeckis and co-writer Gale happened upon lightening as a possible source of the machine's power.

http://pretentiousmusings.com/back_to_the_future.html
 
mehro said:
festen.jpg


Festen (The Celebration)

Plot: A lodge owner's 60th birthday celebrations go horribly wrong when the eldest son makes his toast.

I really enjoyed this movie. It had the hand held camera thing going which pissed me off a couple of times but was fine otherwise. Excellent acting from Ulrich Thomsen, whoever he is. Overall a pretty good, entertaining movie.

8/10.

This movie was fecked beyond belief. Still a real treat to watch. Especially the racist songs they all began singing at dinner.
 
Little Miss Sunshine: I expected an utter piss take of child beauty contests but happily this obvious target was a rather minor part of the proceedings. Great performances from all the main characters and quite a few good laughs along the way. Well worth a watch on DVD: 7.5/10
 
Just saw The Good Shepherd last night, set in the 60's with flashbacks to the 40's...was hard to keep up with the dates, and a very complicated intricate story...but one which I enjoyed - I need to watch it again though to tie up the loose ends...
 
Wibble said:
Little Miss Sunshine: I expected an utter piss take of child beauty contests but happily this obvious target was a rather minor part of the proceedings. Great performances from all the main characters and quite a few good laughs along the way. Well worth a watch on DVD: 7.5/10

you hate cronenberg's crash yet this is well worth a watch? oh, you disappoint me, wibble.

:(
 
It was half decent entertainment on DVD. 7.5 is perhaps a tad generous but given the dross i've seen recently that is understandable.

Crash was utter rubbish and totally unbelievable overacted rubbish at that. IMO of course.

I love some of his films like The Dead Zone, A History Of Violence and to a lesser degree Dead Ringers. I also remember liking The Brood and Scanners although I haven't seen them since I was about 16. Sorry Kev.
 
Wibble said:
It was half decent entertainment on DVD. 7.5 is perhaps a tad generous but given the dross i've seen recently that is understandable.

Crash was utter rubbish and totally unbelievable overacted rubbish at that. IMO of course.

I love some of his films like The Dead Zone, A History Of Violence and to a lesser degree Dead Ringers. I also remember liking The Brood and Scanners although I haven't seen them since I was about 16. Sorry Kev.

funny - i'd say little miss sunshine is the unbelievable overacted rubbish. basically just an indie film cliche dog show in service of a ridiculous, redundant theme of acceptance that it doesn't even believe in; there was really no humaness about it. the dance at the end, an ironic takedown of sexualized child beauty pageants, was the only witty thing in it.

crash is not for everyone, so i can't passionately defend it in all honesty. with dead ringers (which is a masterpiece), it might be cronenberg's most fully-articulated meditation on technology's effect on the human condition. i find it provocative and brave; other find it pretentious and pornographic. but at least it fosters discussion and argument, and maybe even some introspection. little miss sunshine is just inoffensive, crowd-pleasing garbage.
 
Crash is a quite brilliant novel and Cronenberg did it full justice, which is a fairly rare feat for an adaptation.
 
Kevrockcity said:
funny - i'd say little miss sunshine is the unbelievable overacted rubbish. basically just an indie film cliche dog show in service of a ridiculous, redundant theme of acceptance that it doesn't even believe in; there was really no humaness about it. the dance at the end, an ironic takedown of sexualized child beauty pageants, was the only witty thing in it.

I got a bit more out of it that that but due to its lack of ambition it actually succeeded in entertaining me. Nothing more.

crash is not for everyone, so i can't passionately defend it in all honesty. with dead ringers (which is a masterpiece), it might be cronenberg's most fully-articulated meditation on technology's effect on the human condition. i find it provocative and brave; other find it pretentious and pornographic. but at least it fosters discussion and argument, and maybe even some introspection. little miss sunshine is just inoffensive, crowd-pleasing garbage.

The only two people who I know who liked Crash are in the film industry. Which perhaps says something. I didn't find it particularly pornographic, or at least not in a sexual sense, just silly and pretentious.

Agreed about LMS but sometimes that is what you want for a midweek DVD viewing. Just as you can enjoy a Dan Brown novel, Lord Of the Rings and Shakespeare at different times for different reasons.

Obviously I was excluding Digital Fortress when I was talking about enjoying Dan Brown novels.
 
i suppose the da vinci code is fine for what it is, that being a fairly artless history lesson/gender studies lecture told as a conventional thriller. would have been better had it not been so popular - i could have at least stolen some of it to impress college girls at parties. now i'd just look like a guy who steals material from mediocre lowbrow books by guys like dan brown. ugh.

regarding crash, i remembering seeing it with my girlfriend at the time, the friday afternoon of its release. we were the only ones in the theatre and she is not what i would call a cinephile.

that was an interesting experience.
 
peterstorey said:
Crash is a quite brilliant novel and Cronenberg did it full justice, which is a fairly rare feat for an adaptation.

i think the film is better than the book, in all honesty. cronenberg has a habit of doing that - naked lunch being another example as the film is miles better the book. well, kilometers better for you brits.

ever tried to read the atrocity exhibition? that's an endurance test for you. great title, though.
 
I think I prefer books over film on the whole so I don't think Cronenberg's Crash was better. I've not read Atrocity Exhibition, I did read his latest, Kingdom Come, which was good if flawed.
 
Kevrockcity said:
i suppose the da vinci code is fine for what it is, that being a fairly artless history lesson/gender studies lecture told as a conventional thriller. would have been better had it not been so popular - i could have at least stolen some of it to impress college girls at parties. now i'd just look like a guy who steals material from mediocre lowbrow books by guys like dan brown. ugh.

regarding crash, i remembering seeing it with my girlfriend at the time, the friday afternoon of its release. we were the only ones in the theatre and she is not what i would call a cinephile.

that was an interesting experience.

:lol: probably not one of your better dating ideas. :lol:

Could have been worse though. You could have taken her to Caligula.
 
Kevrockcity said:
i think the film is better than the book, in all honesty. cronenberg has a habit of doing that - naked lunch being another example as the film is miles better the book. well, kilometers better for you brits.

ever tried to read the atrocity exhibition? that's an endurance test for you. great title, though.

Brits still use miles. Everything else is metric pretty much. It makes us/them feel better about losing the Empire.
 
yeah, it was funny having to watch that film and drive away. in a car. it's like, are we supposed to feck now or something?
 
Kevrockcity said:
yeah, it was funny having to watch that film and drive away. in a car. it's like, are we supposed to feck now or something?

She was probably shitting herself that you wanted to shag her leg or worse.