Film The Redcafe Movie review thread

The China Syndrome

Rewatched this over the past two nights, great flick. It is a 1979 drama about a California nuclear power plant which experiences an 'accident' & the scramble to try to broadcast it out to the public. The stellar cast led by Jane Fonda, Jack Lemmon, & Michael Douglas (who also produced) were top notch, the drama & tension were palpable through the film, & it played out over a rather taut two hours.

The film premiered 12 days before the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant accident in Pennsylvania ( Three Mile Island accident - Wikipedia ) which helped the film's publicity due to its prescience. It got so intense that Columbia actually pulled the film from some theaters so as not to appear trying to exploit the accident.

8.5 / 10
 
Voleuses (Wingwomen) a French film that came out on Netflix a few weeks ago. Watching the trailer, I thought it would be a funny action movie, but there isn't actually all that much action: it's more about how the two (and then three) women form a heist team, how they bond and work together, how they grow to get along with and train their new recruit - and ultimately how they try to get out of the arrangement in which they work for 'The Godmother' who gives them assignments. It's still funny quite often, but the story arch is a mess. You don't really find out what's the deal with this Godmother (who's quite important in the story, but not in the actual events), the ending is rushed, and there are a lot of other underdeveloped plot points as well. 2/5
 
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button Looks great, well acted, great aging special effects but ultimately overly long slow and pointless. 7/10

I've just realised what annoyed me about this film. He was getting physically younger as he got older but at the end he also had dementia which is essentially a physical thing. So if his body and brain were getting physically younger he wouldn't have dementia/Alzheimers.
 
If it's Neill Marshall, yeah he did - he also did The Descent (which was a good, claustrophobic horror film), Doomsday (which was silly but kinda fun, a wonderful hommage to @Mr Pigeon's country), Centurion (a very good survival flick set in Roman times) and then he did do a Hellboy film but never saw that one or any of his other films.
The Descent was really good, great music in it too. Dog Soldiers was a lot of fun. He did a lot with small budgets. Kinda forgot about him, and now he's done a ton more work, so I can add it to my list.
Voleuses (Wingwomen) a French film that came out on Netflix a few weeks ago. Watching the trailer, I thought it would be a funny action movie, but there isn't actually all that much action: it's more about how the two (and then three) women form a heist team, how they bond and work together, how they grow to get along with and train their new recruit - and ultimately how they try to get out of the arrangement in which they work for 'The Godmother' who gives them assignments. It's still funny quite often, but the story arch is a mess. You don't really find out what's the deal with this Godmother (who's quite important in the story, but not in the actual events), the ending is rushed, and there are a lot of other underdeveloped plot points as well. 2/5
It's the laissez-faire attitude of the French.
I've just realised what annoyed me about this film. He was getting physically younger as he got older but at the end he also had dementia which is essentially a physical thing. So if his body and brain were getting physically younger he wouldn't have dementia/Alzheimers.
Weird that Benjamin Button was based on a short story by F. Scott FitzGerald. I never saw it. Didn't they do some face morphing with Brad Pitt onto a child, or am I misremembering that? Didn't sound like it would be any good, was I wrong?
 
The China Syndrome

Rewatched this over the past two nights, great flick. It is a 1979 drama about a California nuclear power plant which experiences an 'accident' & the scramble to try to broadcast it out to the public. The stellar cast led by Jane Fonda, Jack Lemmon, & Michael Douglas (who also produced) were top notch, the drama & tension were palpable through the film, & it played out over a rather taut two hours.

The film premiered 12 days before the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant accident in Pennsylvania ( Three Mile Island accident - Wikipedia ) which helped the film's publicity due to its prescience. It got so intense that Columbia actually pulled the film from some theaters so as not to appear trying to exploit the accident.

8.5 / 10

This is a terrific film. Jack Lemmon is just brilliant.
 
Weird that Benjamin Button was based on a short story by F. Scott FitzGerald. I never saw it. Didn't they do some face morphing with Brad Pitt onto a child, or am I misremembering that? Didn't sound like it would be any good, was I wrong?
:lol:

I really dislike this film.
I really liked it - it's vastly different from the book / novella (which I think is only 20/30 pages long, read it yonks ago). But it has a lot of charm and I thought really well acted.

Fincher turned it into a Forrest Gump-esque tale (including an interspersed love story similar to Forrest and Jenny's). It's enjoyable though.
 
I really liked it - it's vastly different from the book / novella (which I think is only 20/30 pages long, read it yonks ago). But it has a lot of charm and I thought really well acted.

Fincher turned it into a Forrest Gump-esque tale (including an interspersed love story similar to Forrest and Jenny's). It's enjoyable though.
I actually enjoyed the novella, but the film just didn't do it for me. Nothing particularly wrong with it, just leaves me cold.
 
Just started watching full metal jacket. It's been probs 20 years since I last saw it. Man, they don't make them like that anymore. First 5 mins utterly scrambled my 14 yr olds uncultured brain. My 6 yr old got a bit put off by the effin and blinding...
 
The Boy and the Heron

It's been 10 years since The Wind Rises so you can imagine the anticipation. Unfortunately I left the theater a little bit disappointed.

Good:
This might be Miyazaki's most beautiful-looking film. The animation is stunning. This is honestly reason enough to go watch it. Joe Hisaishi is back as well, so you know the score will be good. I also think this might be the funniest Ghibli film since Porco Rosso. There are some hilarious creators in this film that had the movie theater howling with laughter quite often.

The not so good (but still not bad):
The story-telling is a bit messy if I'm being honest. It's not quite Howl's Moving Castle level bad though, so no need to panic.

Other thoughts:
This is definitely Miyazaki's most ambitious film since Spirited Away. And speaking of that: The Boy and the Heron definitely has the same vibe! It also feels like a mish mash of at least 5 other Ghibli films. It's almost like an AI was tasked with writing an homage to Miyazaki.
 
Just started watching full metal jacket. It's been probs 20 years since I last saw it. Man, they don't make them like that anymore. First 5 mins utterly scrambled my 14 yr olds uncultured brain. My 6 yr old got a bit put off by the effin and blinding...
Watching Full Metal Jacket with a 6 year old! You have to ease them into it, start with Apocalypse Now! ;)
 
The Killer Not as bad as the reviews. I quite enjoyed it but there was far too much exposition, which is rarely, if ever, a good sign. It also seemed to run out of plot a third of the way in. And the last bit made no sense.
Why show the last bloke mercy?
If there was a point it escaped me. Overall the film felt like a wasted opportunity. 6/10

+2 for the mainly The Smiths soundtrack.
 
Last edited:
The Killer Not as bad as the reviews. I quite enjoyed it but there was far too much exposition, which is rarely, if ever, a good sign. It also seemed to run out of plot a third of the way in. And the last bit made no sense.
Why show the last bloke mercy?
If there was a point it escaped me. Overall the film felt like a wasted opportunity. 6/10
because he knew the blowback would be too immense.
 
Watched a few films recently. Will try my best to remember.

The Host

I've had this one on my watch list for quite some time, but was waiting for it to pop up on a streaming service that I have. I knew very little about this other than it was a Bong Joon-ho film and that it was rated quite highly. I really liked it, as did the wife. There 'attack' scene that happens in the first part of the film is frantic and pulsating. The 'quest' for the second part is intriguing and you're never quite sure what will happen next, combined with a few twists and a bittersweet ending. I personally thought it was very good. I like his style a lot and this one is perhaps a little different to some of his other films, but it's also still got that 'heart' that runs throughout, and a few societal and moral questions, too. I loved it and will watch this again at some point in the future.

Memories of Murder

Again, I went into this one completely blind and only knew it was by Bong Joon-ho when I looked it up. Think it was on Channel 4's streaming service. Again, I really, really liked it. This one is closer to Parasite than some of his other films in the sense that it depicts that grim, imbalanced world. It's partly based on a series of real life murders and it's somewhat disturbing to see how close it actually is to the reality, even in some of the more bizarre parts. It's very, um, anti-Police in various parts, so to speak. The ending will frustrate some as there is a lack of resolution, but I found that to be very powerful, especially the final closing scene. Kim Sang-kyung arguably steals the show as a detective from Seoul who basically gets brought down to Song Kang-ho's level. It's quite tragic in that sense, almost that the longer you spend in the system, the further it weakens and corrupts you. This is up there with the greats of the 21st century, in my opinion.

Pearl

I've seen X, which I liked a lot, but I personally thought this was better. Without spoiling it, that ending shot will stay with me for a long time. It's masterfully crafted with the way that specific scene is filmed. It's the best kind of prequel in the sense that it doesn't go too far to explain why the events in the first film happen the way they do, but it serves well as it's own separate story that could be viewed without even ever watching X. Mia Goth is utterly brilliant and so watchable in this. Nothing seems to go right and it only seems that it's going to end up going one way...which is complete and utter mayhem. This really should be on people's watchlists if they are into that modern day horror/psychological thriller vibe.

Green Room

This was a grim watch, but it's also a great film, in my opinion. Firstly, it's sad watching Anton Yelchin and knowing that he passed away a year after this film. He had so much promise and he's a great lead in this film. Secondly, Patrick Stewart makes for a very compelling villain. He's not the most obvious choice for the role that he plays, but he carries it through very well. This film handles the whole claustrophobia/backs against the wall feeling well, and it's pretty tense in various places. As mentioned earlier, there are more than a couple of moments that are not easy to watch due to the gruesome nature of the film, so it's not for everyone. However, I'd put this in the same category as Pearl above, in the sense that's a good modern day psychological thriller, with a pretty decent runtime of 95 minutes. I liked it, but I'm not in a rush to watch it again so soon.

Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978 remake)

I'm a huge fan of this film and the original. I grew up watching the original probably a few times a year, as I'm a huge fan of the genre. I have to say that I do think that this film surpasses it and that it is one of the best films of its type, ever. It's just brilliant. Magnificent. It reminds me of that Night/Dawn of the Dead sort of film where the stakes just get higher and higher throughout. I do think that this film handles the growing sense of dread and paranoia slightly better than the original, and the 'garden' scene where Donald Sutherland decides to take a nap is just absolutely fecking terrifying. The way that scene plays out makes my skin crawl and I don't think either myself or my wife took a breath during that sequence. The ending is, in my opinion, one of the greatest all-time endings to any film. It's shocking, it's thrilling, it's memorable, and it's just so well executed.

Looking back on these 5 films, I think I'm on a very good run! :drool:
 
Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One

Absolute crap of a movie. Other than the bike jumping over a cliff stunt, there's nothing that redeems this movie from being a lame sequel that offers nothing new. Ridiculous plot that makes no sense, actions that has been done in similar fashion before, lame comedy content and an boring length makes for a crap sequel.

Rebecca Ferguson > Hayley Atwell

3/10
 
She Came To Me, (Oct. 6, 2023)
With Peter Dinklage, Anne Hathaway, Marisa Tomei.

A rom-com that's not too "rom" and the "com" is mild. Interesting / different characters. Dinklage is an opera composer who has lost his jam. He's married to an OCD psychiatrist (Hathaway), and he has a one-off with a tugboat captain (Tomei) that reignites his songwriting. There's also a B-story involving Dinklage's adopted son and his high school girlfriend, and a C-story with the girlfriend's mother and stepfather. This is the kind of rom-com I can stand. When everything is lit with pixie lights and there are meet-cutes and Hugh Grant shows up, I can't stand those. This one was a quirky film that felt more like a play. The opera parts are presented straight, which is cool to see opera not mocked, but the operas he writes sound ridiculous but are received rapturously.

I was surprised when
Dinklage suddenly confesses his love for Tomei at almost the end of the film
, but my wife saw it coming a mile away. They wrote the tugboat captain character as kind of a drunk slut at the beginning who is in a bar at 11 AM trying to find a dude to bring back to the boat and bone, which she openly admits. Then she admits she had to go to rehab for "sex and romance addiction". You see all that in the trailer. They rehabilitate her by showing how much responsibility she has as a boat captain with a crew of people working for her. And they literally have one of her crew say, "she is just a really good person, with a really good heart, and I don't want to see her get hurt". This felt like Tomei demanded some rewrites. Initially she's a crazy stalker and they change that to hopeless romantic who's crazy in love with Dinklage after one afternoon bonk session. Not sure that actually worked, to be honest. Not seeing what Dinklage or Tomei really saw in each other. I didn't detect any heat between them. They didn't have repartee, they didn't share a bunch of interests, they didn't finish each other's -- sandwiches. It was a little flat.

The other thing that was a bit undercooked was Hathaway's character. I like her. I will watch anything she is in. She is a psychiatrist with elegant clothes in an immaculate house but then she is shown to be an OCD neatness freak. She has an appointment cancel and is stoked to be able to clean alongside her charwoman. They hint around that there must be a reason for this, but nothing comes of it. I expected some big reveal where she realizes her upbringing caused whatever. She mentions that she got pregnant in medical school, continued her studies, and had to go live with her grandma - but they never come back to this and explain what her relationship with her dad was (it's hinted there was something of note there). At the end she
becomes a nun, after rediscovering that she was raised Catholic and longing for the empty cell of a nun. It makes no sense. She has a nervous breakdown and then basically stays insane.
There's a moment where the script is trying to explain her character, when she tells her son that his father left her, and the son says no, he died. Then Anne says, well he left and then he died, but I thought we were going to reconcile.

The script tries to say something about first loves or spontaneous loves or something. It's not clear what it thinks, but there are two characters who are messed up over their first loves (Anne Hathaway, and the girlfriend's mother), and then
their children (high school kids) are suddenly in legal trouble because her stepdad wants to press charges against Hathaway's son for being 18 and having sex with the 16 year old girlfriend. So we're supposed to believe these two are making the right decision when they get married. The girlfriend's stepdad is a weird character who is rigid and convinced he's always right, and is insisting the boyfriend get done for statutory rape -- but doesn't explain why. She's not pregnant. She's going away to college soon. And he doesn't offer a deal, like "stop seeing her and I drop the charges", it's just presented as the stepdad is going to ruin this kid's life and have him be a registered sex offender. Look, I really liked my high school girlfriends too, but marrying them would have been a disaster, as I'm sure is the case for practically everyone, but not in this movie. It's weird.

So, it was enjoyable enough. Dinklage has such great expressions and is always fun to watch. Hathaway is great to look at but should have asked her part to be rewritten so it made some fecking sense. Tomei was good but needed her hair washed. And brushed. The high school kids subplot was kind of unnecessary and I'm not sure what they were trying to prove with it, other than providing a deus ex machina for the other characters.

Forgot three things: 1.) they change the aspect ratio depending on what type of scene is happening. For ordinary every day scenes, they shoot in 1:85 with letter box mattes (like a rectangle). When things are "romantic" they shoot it as 1:33 (like a square more or less), which is the old TV aspect ratio. I found it weird. It didn't heighten anything. I would have switched it, if what they were going for was to make the romantic bits seem grander, more beautiful. Instead, they made shit look like a TV show when it was supposed to be romantic, and then beautiful when it was ordinary stuff. 2.) I read that initially Steve Carell, Amy Schumer (!), and Nicole Kidman were set to star. And then later, Mathew Broderick. That leads me to think the script was massively rejiggered. I can't imagine Amy Schumer in the tugboat captain role, or at least not the way Tomei played it (which was realistic). Schumer would have been broad and loud and stupid, the female Will Farrell. Steve Carell I am assuming would have been the composer, but I just don't see it, same with Broderick. Casting is king, as they say. 3.) Hathaway is shown in the trailer taking off her clothes, but she is not shown naked. I was looking forward to that, and she's been naked in dozens of films, so what gives, Hathaway!

7.5/10 seems high, but I guess it's a C+ / B - type of grade.
 
Last edited:
Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One

Absolute crap of a movie. Other than the bike jumping over a cliff stunt, there's nothing that redeems this movie from being a lame sequel that offers nothing new. Ridiculous plot that makes no sense, actions that has been done in similar fashion before, lame comedy content and an boring length makes for a crap sequel.

Rebecca Ferguson > Hayley Atwell

3/10

Good score though.
 
Bottoms

This movie really wants to be a Superbad clone, but fails miserably. The dialogs are very cringe and forced, the acting and story are horrible and you don't care about the characters at all. It has a few funny moments (especially the jocks and Hazel), so it wasn't too bad.


6 out of 10
 
Last edited:
A Better Tomorrow
Woo greatest strength imo is he ability to overloaded the screen with symbolism, emotion and coolness(cough Mi2 lab scene cough)to the point where the scenes become cinematic.

Scorsese said Citizen Kane showed the world Americans can produce artistic films. Woo is the same but for the action movies.

chow-yun-fat-a-better-tomorrow.gif


9/10

Face Off


On the face of it this should have been a career killer for everyone involved yet…..it’s a work of true genius. Cage & Travolta put in incredible performances and Woo brings great action.

My favourite part might be a character diving off a oil rid in the middle of the Atlantic ocean only to then two scenes later appear in suburban America. It’s never explain how.

Every big blockbuster movie should be this.

10/10

Past Lives


“It's Pretty, But Is It Art?”

I really wanted to like this. It is ernest in the story it wants to tell but ultimately it’s upper class bland progressivism.

There’s a artificial vibe throughout as the characters don’t show any negatives emotions and rarely any humour. Always waiting for the characters to come to life but they never do. Almost feels like the film desperately wants the audience to like love characters without running the risk of putting anyone off.

The white Jewish dude was bizarrely self hating and into thinking about his wife sleeping with other men. Tbh I would argue that character portray was kind of anti semitic.

There’s a few interesting shots but overall it’s very much a A24 looking film. It’s terrified to appear ugly or to do anything interesting with the camera

The final long take was sweet moment but overall pretty disappointingly.

5/10
 
Face Off

On the face of it this should have been a career killer for everyone involved yet…..it’s a work of true genius. Cage & Travolta put in incredible performances and Woo brings great action.

My favourite part might be a character diving off a oil rid in the middle of the Atlantic ocean only to then two scenes later appear in suburban America. It’s never explain how.

Every big blockbuster movie should be this.

10/10

I can't fully express how much I hated this film. 0/10 is far too generous.
 
Watched a few films recently. Will try my best to remember.

The Host

I've had this one on my watch list for quite some time, but was waiting for it to pop up on a streaming service that I have. I knew very little about this other than it was a Bong Joon-ho film and that it was rated quite highly. I really liked it, as did the wife. There 'attack' scene that happens in the first part of the film is frantic and pulsating. The 'quest' for the second part is intriguing and you're never quite sure what will happen next, combined with a few twists and a bittersweet ending. I personally thought it was very good. I like his style a lot and this one is perhaps a little different to some of his other films, but it's also still got that 'heart' that runs throughout, and a few societal and moral questions, too. I loved it and will watch this again at some point in the future.

Memories of Murder

Again, I went into this one completely blind and only knew it was by Bong Joon-ho when I looked it up. Think it was on Channel 4's streaming service. Again, I really, really liked it. This one is closer to Parasite than some of his other films in the sense that it depicts that grim, imbalanced world. It's partly based on a series of real life murders and it's somewhat disturbing to see how close it actually is to the reality, even in some of the more bizarre parts. It's very, um, anti-Police in various parts, so to speak. The ending will frustrate some as there is a lack of resolution, but I found that to be very powerful, especially the final closing scene. Kim Sang-kyung arguably steals the show as a detective from Seoul who basically gets brought down to Song Kang-ho's level. It's quite tragic in that sense, almost that the longer you spend in the system, the further it weakens and corrupts you. This is up there with the greats of the 21st century, in my opinion.

Pearl

I've seen X, which I liked a lot, but I personally thought this was better. Without spoiling it, that ending shot will stay with me for a long time. It's masterfully crafted with the way that specific scene is filmed. It's the best kind of prequel in the sense that it doesn't go too far to explain why the events in the first film happen the way they do, but it serves well as it's own separate story that could be viewed without even ever watching X. Mia Goth is utterly brilliant and so watchable in this. Nothing seems to go right and it only seems that it's going to end up going one way...which is complete and utter mayhem. This really should be on people's watchlists if they are into that modern day horror/psychological thriller vibe.

Green Room

This was a grim watch, but it's also a great film, in my opinion. Firstly, it's sad watching Anton Yelchin and knowing that he passed away a year after this film. He had so much promise and he's a great lead in this film. Secondly, Patrick Stewart makes for a very compelling villain. He's not the most obvious choice for the role that he plays, but he carries it through very well. This film handles the whole claustrophobia/backs against the wall feeling well, and it's pretty tense in various places. As mentioned earlier, there are more than a couple of moments that are not easy to watch due to the gruesome nature of the film, so it's not for everyone. However, I'd put this in the same category as Pearl above, in the sense that's a good modern day psychological thriller, with a pretty decent runtime of 95 minutes. I liked it, but I'm not in a rush to watch it again so soon.

Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978 remake)

I'm a huge fan of this film and the original. I grew up watching the original probably a few times a year, as I'm a huge fan of the genre. I have to say that I do think that this film surpasses it and that it is one of the best films of its type, ever. It's just brilliant. Magnificent. It reminds me of that Night/Dawn of the Dead sort of film where the stakes just get higher and higher throughout. I do think that this film handles the growing sense of dread and paranoia slightly better than the original, and the 'garden' scene where Donald Sutherland decides to take a nap is just absolutely fecking terrifying. The way that scene plays out makes my skin crawl and I don't think either myself or my wife took a breath during that sequence. The ending is, in my opinion, one of the greatest all-time endings to any film. It's shocking, it's thrilling, it's memorable, and it's just so well executed.

Looking back on these 5 films, I think I'm on a very good run! :drool:

Ratings?
 
I can't fully express how much I hated this film. 0/10 is far too generous.
What did you dislike about it ? It’s pretty much a action comedy. With two of the biggest Hollywood leads trying to over acting each other while directed by the greatest action director of all time. It’s too much fun to hate.

giphy.gif
 
The podcast 'How Did This get Made?' has a good episode on Face Off. I found the film a LOT of fun.
 
What did you dislike about it ? It’s pretty much a action comedy. With two of the biggest Hollywood leads trying to over acting each other while directed by the greatest action director of all time. It’s too much fun to hate.

giphy.gif
It’s Wibble. He hates movies.
 
Face/Off has 92% on Rotten Tomatoes, directly influenced the writing of Infernal Affairs and Nic Cage considers it his homage to German expressionism.

Cinema
 
How is the caf-rating for Dredd? Thinking about Fury Road within the other thread made me mentally connect those two for whatever reason. Both embraced that style over substance imho in a positive way so while not being classics for me they‘re both quite re-watchable with some time inbetween. Dredd certainly the niche one of the two although I think both aren‘t really hitting the taste of a mainstream mass audience.
 
Fallen Leaves - The new tragicomedy from Aki Kaurismaki, which I found endearing and highly watchable. It tells a lovely romance story laced with huge amounts of deadpan humour. Brief at only 1hr 20 mins but it didn't need to be longer.

On this note, I find it interesting it's been distributed by Mubi but they aren't putting it on their streaming platform straightaway. Maybe online subs aren't bringing in enough revenue these days?
 
What did you dislike about it ? It’s pretty much a action comedy. With two of the biggest Hollywood leads trying to over acting each other while directed by the greatest action director of all time. It’s too much fun to hate.

giphy.gif

Enragingly stupid even for a Cage film.

And I don't think I've seem a Woo film that was much cop. Broken Arrow and MI2 weren't great for example.
 
Enragingly stupid even for a Cage film.

And I don't think I've seem a Woo film that was much cop. Broken Arrow and MI2 weren't great for example.
I recommend The Killer wherever I can but John Woo films might not just work for you. The style is the substance. As @Wing Attack Plan R says it’s operatic.

The emotions drive the action and plot. Any realism is thrown out the window and shot with an uzi.
 
How is the caf-rating for Dredd? Thinking about Fury Road within the other thread made me mentally connect those two for whatever reason. Both embraced that style over substance imho in a positive way so while not being classics for me they‘re both quite re-watchable with some time inbetween. Dredd certainly the niche one of the two although I think both aren‘t really hitting the taste of a mainstream mass audience.

i really liked it (assume you're talking about the 2012 film), but other reviews online (i don't think here) immediately told me it's a slightly worse copy of an indonesian movie (the raid), which i haven't seen yet.
 
I recommend The Killer wherever I can but John Woo films might not just work for you. The style is the substance. As @Wing Attack Plan R says it’s operatic.

The emotions drive the action and plot. Any realism is thrown out the window and shot with an uzi.

I enjoyed The Killer but it lost its way and ended up being rather pointless. I reviewed it in this thread.

Face/Off was even worse for me as I can't stand Cage and Travolta is rubbish in most things but with occasional exceptions like Pulp Fiction.