OverratedOpinion
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2017
- Messages
- 8,736
Money aside, AJ must be thanking his lucky stars that the Fury fight fell through.
I don't think he'd tell you any different and has stated he'll always be playing catch-up after getting into boxing late, a time when boxers from single digit age are already putting the finishing touches on fundamentals that are intrinsically enmeshed via that formative development.I don't think it's that he's too nice, it's that he doesn't have the brains to work out a problem in front of him. I don't think he's a truly well schooled boxer that has learnt to think about what is happening the right way. He's underperformed and lost now quite a few times, since he's been pushed beyond beating up tired journeymen. He's faced fighters with different styles and too many times he's failed when his robotic combinations, list of head/foot movement etc isn't enough to just blast somebody out. If it gets tactical or a new style is presented, he can't work it out. Perhaps his coaches are partly to blame but I think he is lacking in the fundamentals of being able to box well. Listen to him talk compared to other fighters and he had no real insight into anything and that shows in his fights.
And then we've had clowns talking about him "showing he can box" more after his recent fights, just because he doesn't knock somebody out or fights behind a predictable jab. Laughable.
Cracking post. Will digest that.Sorry haven't popped in in a while. Been super busy. Great fight on Saturday.
My takeaways:
1. Usyk was masterful with his foot placement (see how his lead foot was always on the outside of Joshua's lead?), his feints (body and head) and Joshua simply doesn't have the head movement to avoid his one-two and deadly accurate right down the middle. These are adjustments Joshua probably can't correct in 6 months or with an instant rematch.
2. Joshua fought well contrary to some of the shite I've seen about him being a "bum", or "exposed", fickle "fans" like that are simply shitting on the quality of Usyk and the magnitude of his achievements. I personally hate to see a great fighter have credit taken away from him because some so-called fans are more into hating a fighter (in this case Joshua) than being a fan of the sport or giving someone credit they earned. Joshua, you could see, was making adjustments. He looked like a big clumsy lump for the first four rounds and was badly outclassed but fought well in the middle rounds, connecting some decent shots and taking the play away from Usyk at times. You could see him thinking and certain things working and that's to be credited because after four rounds he looked like he'd lose every round. Still, Usyk's determination, skill, will etc; saw him dominate late. I had him winning the first four and the last four, and of the middle four rounds he won 1 or 2 of them. I think 117-111 felt like the right score.
3. Usyk is certainly the best fighter in the world, and to my estimation, he's the greatest of his era (Mayweather-Pacquaio being the end of the previous era). He's a special talent and a rare character. Think about this: While it took Canelo years and some subpar GGG performances to put his big boy pants on, take some PED's and fight him, he ran away after getting a gift draw and what most consider a gift "win." Look at how difficult it is to get American fighters to fight tough fights, with the exception of Shawn Porter. Spence-Crawford is already past due. Look at the state of the lightweights, just going to social media while doing nothing. Usyk beat a well-regarded unbeaten champion in Krzysztof Glowacki in his backyard in Poland to win a world title in his 10th fight, beats a good unbeaten American challenger, and now respected heavyweight, Michael Hunter, in America. Enters the WBSS, not knowing who he'd have to fight, and is it went, he beat one of the best cruisers ever in Marco Huck in Germany, his backyard, then beats undefeated Mairis Briedis, adding his second title, in his backyard of Latvia (and look at what Briedis has gone on to achieve since...), then went to Russia to beat undefeated Murat Gassiev, who was on fire and held the other two belts. Usyk shut him out. Then he came to England knocked out Bellew, now he's gone to England again in front of 70,000 fans and put on a clinic against a very big, heavy hitting heavyweight champion, who's younger than him and had three titles. There's no drama with Usyk. He's proof if a fighter wants the fights, the fights happen. No controversial wins, no failed PED tests, no suspicions of PED's, no trash talk, just fights, wins, and looks incredible almost every time. I hope he gets the rematch in Ukraine, as he deserves to fight at home for once.
4. Wilder would be cannon fodder for Usyk, Fury would be a style issue. Usyk is definitely the better boxer than Fury, but Fury has height and reach and knows how to use it, isn't afraid to stink it out. He also doesn't gas, so it's a tall order for Usyk, but he's definitely live in that fight.
My new p4p: 1. Usyk 2. Inoue 3. Crawford 4. Lomachenko* 5. Canelo 6. Taylor 7. Fury 8. Lopez 9. Estrada 10. Spence
* Lomachenko above Lopez? Yeah, he's a better fighter and I'm convinced he'd win a rematch rather easily. He carried an injury which was quite clear and it was a case of Lopez also coupling that injury with a massive size advantage but he didn't really do anything. It was a case of both guys doing nothing, but him doing a bit better at doing nothing for the first half, but then Lomachenko bossing the action when they did fight a little. Canelo, as many know, I'm not as blown away as others. The obvious cheating, plus a lot of gift decisions and now he's just moved up to a really, really weak division as middleweight was hot? That was a shitty move IMO. Beterbiev is on the cusp but I wasn't thrilled with his last performance. Estrada, I love, but think lost to Chocolatito, and has a lot of tread in his tires, especially for the lower weights, but his resume is top notch.
What do you think the strategy will be if they get the rematch? I don't buy the go at him with bigger mass and duke it out thing, because, even in this fight, if Usyk had enough power, he would have knocked Joshua out with how he was connecting, and if Joshua is then leaning into punches in the next bout, he'll double up the force and trauma and probably get himself knocked out.Sorry haven't popped in in a while. Been super busy. Great fight on Saturday.
My takeaways:
1. Usyk was masterful with his foot placement (see how his lead foot was always on the outside of Joshua's lead?), his feints (body and head) and Joshua simply doesn't have the head movement to avoid his one-two and deadly accurate right down the middle. These are adjustments Joshua probably can't correct in 6 months or with an instant rematch.
2. Joshua fought well contrary to some of the shite I've seen about him being a "bum", or "exposed", fickle "fans" like that are simply shitting on the quality of Usyk and the magnitude of his achievements. I personally hate to see a great fighter have credit taken away from him because some so-called fans are more into hating a fighter (in this case Joshua) than being a fan of the sport or giving someone credit they earned. Joshua, you could see, was making adjustments. He looked like a big clumsy lump for the first four rounds and was badly outclassed but fought well in the middle rounds, connecting some decent shots and taking the play away from Usyk at times. You could see him thinking and certain things working and that's to be credited because after four rounds he looked like he'd lose every round. Still, Usyk's determination, skill, will etc; saw him dominate late. I had him winning the first four and the last four, and of the middle four rounds he won 1 or 2 of them. I think 117-111 felt like the right score.
3. Usyk is certainly the best fighter in the world, and to my estimation, he's the greatest of his era (Mayweather-Pacquaio being the end of the previous era). He's a special talent and a rare character. Think about this: While it took Canelo years and some subpar GGG performances to put his big boy pants on, take some PED's and fight him, he ran away after getting a gift draw and what most consider a gift "win." Look at how difficult it is to get American fighters to fight tough fights, with the exception of Shawn Porter. Spence-Crawford is already past due. Look at the state of the lightweights, just going to social media while doing nothing. Usyk beat a well-regarded unbeaten champion in Krzysztof Glowacki in his backyard in Poland to win a world title in his 10th fight, beats a good unbeaten American challenger, and now respected heavyweight, Michael Hunter, in America. Enters the WBSS, not knowing who he'd have to fight, and is it went, he beat one of the best cruisers ever in Marco Huck in Germany, his backyard, then beats undefeated Mairis Briedis, adding his second title, in his backyard of Latvia (and look at what Briedis has gone on to achieve since...), then went to Russia to beat undefeated Murat Gassiev, who was on fire and held the other two belts. Usyk shut him out. Then he came to England knocked out Bellew, now he's gone to England again in front of 70,000 fans and put on a clinic against a very big, heavy hitting heavyweight champion, who's younger than him and had three titles. There's no drama with Usyk. He's proof if a fighter wants the fights, the fights happen. No controversial wins, no failed PED tests, no suspicions of PED's, no trash talk, just fights, wins, and looks incredible almost every time. I hope he gets the rematch in Ukraine, as he deserves to fight at home for once.
4. Wilder would be cannon fodder for Usyk, Fury would be a style issue. Usyk is definitely the better boxer than Fury, but Fury has height and reach and knows how to use it, isn't afraid to stink it out. He also doesn't gas, so it's a tall order for Usyk, but he's definitely live in that fight.
My new p4p: 1. Usyk 2. Inoue 3. Crawford 4. Lomachenko* 5. Canelo 6. Taylor 7. Fury 8. Lopez 9. Estrada 10. Spence
* Lomachenko above Lopez? Yeah, he's a better fighter and I'm convinced he'd win a rematch rather easily. He carried an injury which was quite clear and it was a case of Lopez also coupling that injury with a massive size advantage but he didn't really do anything. It was a case of both guys doing nothing, but him doing a bit better at doing nothing for the first half, but then Lomachenko bossing the action when they did fight a little. Canelo, as many know, I'm not as blown away as others. The obvious cheating, plus a lot of gift decisions and now he's just moved up to a really, really weak division as middleweight was hot? That was a shitty move IMO. Beterbiev is on the cusp but I wasn't thrilled with his last performance. Estrada, I love, but think lost to Chocolatito, and has a lot of tread in his tires, especially for the lower weights, but his resume is top notch.
I honestly don’t know what strategy I’d advise to be honest. I’m just sure that his current team aren’t the right team to come up with a strategy. I think his best bet is just trying to utilize his size and hope he land’s something Usyk can’t recover from. But that leaves him open and 9/10 in that type of fight, I’m sure it gets him KO’d.What do you think the strategy will be if they get the rematch? I don't buy the go at him with bigger mass and duke it out thing, because, even in this fight, if Usyk had enough power, he would have knocked Joshua out with how he was connecting, and if Joshua is then leaning into punches in the next bout, he'll double up the force and trauma and probably get himself knocked out.
Your point 1: there's just no way these big heavies are going to match Usyk for movement and the speed at which he transitions from movement to getting shots off before being on his bike again. I was really surprised he could maintain that for the whole fight as I totally expected him to be spent by the 6th if he even attempted that.
2. has been ridiculous, and it was patently obvious Joshua was making adjustments and having success with them; the problem is Usyk is of the calibre where he will make countering adjustments and again take the upper hand, which is what we saw. He's just too good a boxer for Joshua to keep up with in that regard.
It's weird to see Loma so low in any list, but I guess that's in appreciation of those who are above him for the time being. It's a classy top 5, for sure. Not sure I'd put Usyk 1st, but at the same time, can see the logic in doing so after what he's just done.
Nice to see you posting.
Yeah, I've been thinking about that; I think Usyk will make more adaptations and adjustments than Joshua now that he knows how he moves and thinks and negate a counter strategy out the gate. Being bullish and going all out, will, I think get him K.O'd. I thought he could fight long and behind the jab, but Usyk is far too mobile for that.I honestly don’t know what strategy I’d advise to be honest. I’m just sure that his current team aren’t the right team to come up with a strategy. I think his best bet is just trying to utilize his size and hope he land’s something Usyk can’t recover from. But that leaves him open and 9/10 in that type of fight, I’m sure it gets him KO’d.
Usyk has about 100 different ways to fight. Nobody is going to confuse him. He’ll adapt. He’ll only lose because someone is far bigger or he gets old because he’s far too good for fighters of his generation.
Lomachenko looked incredible last time out. It’s been clear he’s undersized at lightweight and he was obviously holding an injury in all those fights. Hope he gets a string of big ones now.
Sorry haven't popped in in a while. Been super busy. Great fight on Saturday.
My takeaways:
1. Usyk was masterful with his foot placement (see how his lead foot was always on the outside of Joshua's lead?), his feints (body and head) and Joshua simply doesn't have the head movement to avoid his one-two and deadly accurate right down the middle. These are adjustments Joshua probably can't correct in 6 months or with an instant rematch.
2. Joshua fought well contrary to some of the shite I've seen about him being a "bum", or "exposed", fickle "fans" like that are simply shitting on the quality of Usyk and the magnitude of his achievements. I personally hate to see a great fighter have credit taken away from him because some so-called fans are more into hating a fighter (in this case Joshua) than being a fan of the sport or giving someone credit they earned. Joshua, you could see, was making adjustments. He looked like a big clumsy lump for the first four rounds and was badly outclassed but fought well in the middle rounds, connecting some decent shots and taking the play away from Usyk at times. You could see him thinking and certain things working and that's to be credited because after four rounds he looked like he'd lose every round. Still, Usyk's determination, skill, will etc; saw him dominate late. I had him winning the first four and the last four, and of the middle four rounds he won 1 or 2 of them. I think 117-111 felt like the right score.
3. Usyk is certainly the best fighter in the world, and to my estimation, he's the greatest of his era (Mayweather-Pacquaio being the end of the previous era). He's a special talent and a rare character. Think about this: While it took Canelo years and some subpar GGG performances to put his big boy pants on, take some PED's and fight him, he ran away after getting a gift draw and what most consider a gift "win." Look at how difficult it is to get American fighters to fight tough fights, with the exception of Shawn Porter. Spence-Crawford is already past due. Look at the state of the lightweights, just going to social media while doing nothing. Usyk beat a well-regarded unbeaten champion in Krzysztof Glowacki in his backyard in Poland to win a world title in his 10th fight, beats a good unbeaten American challenger, and now respected heavyweight, Michael Hunter, in America. Enters the WBSS, not knowing who he'd have to fight, and is it went, he beat one of the best cruisers ever in Marco Huck in Germany, his backyard, then beats undefeated Mairis Briedis, adding his second title, in his backyard of Latvia (and look at what Briedis has gone on to achieve since...), then went to Russia to beat undefeated Murat Gassiev, who was on fire and held the other two belts. Usyk shut him out. Then he came to England knocked out Bellew, now he's gone to England again in front of 70,000 fans and put on a clinic against a very big, heavy hitting heavyweight champion, who's younger than him and had three titles. There's no drama with Usyk. He's proof if a fighter wants the fights, the fights happen. No controversial wins, no failed PED tests, no suspicions of PED's, no trash talk, just fights, wins, and looks incredible almost every time. I hope he gets the rematch in Ukraine, as he deserves to fight at home for once.
4. Wilder would be cannon fodder for Usyk, Fury would be a style issue. Usyk is definitely the better boxer than Fury, but Fury has height and reach and knows how to use it, isn't afraid to stink it out. He also doesn't gas, so it's a tall order for Usyk, but he's definitely live in that fight.
My new p4p: 1. Usyk 2. Inoue 3. Crawford 4. Lomachenko* 5. Canelo 6. Taylor 7. Fury 8. Lopez 9. Estrada 10. Spence
* Lomachenko above Lopez? Yeah, he's a better fighter and I'm convinced he'd win a rematch rather easily. He carried an injury which was quite clear and it was a case of Lopez also coupling that injury with a massive size advantage but he didn't really do anything. It was a case of both guys doing nothing, but him doing a bit better at doing nothing for the first half, but then Lomachenko bossing the action when they did fight a little. Canelo, as many know, I'm not as blown away as others. The obvious cheating, plus a lot of gift decisions and now he's just moved up to a really, really weak division as middleweight was hot? That was a shitty move IMO. Beterbiev is on the cusp but I wasn't thrilled with his last performance. Estrada, I love, but think lost to Chocolatito, and has a lot of tread in his tires, especially for the lower weights, but his resume is top notch.
Good post.Sorry haven't popped in in a while. Been super busy. Great fight on Saturday.
My takeaways:
1. Usyk was masterful with his foot placement (see how his lead foot was always on the outside of Joshua's lead?), his feints (body and head) and Joshua simply doesn't have the head movement to avoid his one-two and deadly accurate right down the middle. These are adjustments Joshua probably can't correct in 6 months or with an instant rematch.
2. Joshua fought well contrary to some of the shite I've seen about him being a "bum", or "exposed", fickle "fans" like that are simply shitting on the quality of Usyk and the magnitude of his achievements. I personally hate to see a great fighter have credit taken away from him because some so-called fans are more into hating a fighter (in this case Joshua) than being a fan of the sport or giving someone credit they earned. Joshua, you could see, was making adjustments. He looked like a big clumsy lump for the first four rounds and was badly outclassed but fought well in the middle rounds, connecting some decent shots and taking the play away from Usyk at times. You could see him thinking and certain things working and that's to be credited because after four rounds he looked like he'd lose every round. Still, Usyk's determination, skill, will etc; saw him dominate late. I had him winning the first four and the last four, and of the middle four rounds he won 1 or 2 of them. I think 117-111 felt like the right score.
3. Usyk is certainly the best fighter in the world, and to my estimation, he's the greatest of his era (Mayweather-Pacquaio being the end of the previous era). He's a special talent and a rare character. Think about this: While it took Canelo years and some subpar GGG performances to put his big boy pants on, take some PED's and fight him, he ran away after getting a gift draw and what most consider a gift "win." Look at how difficult it is to get American fighters to fight tough fights, with the exception of Shawn Porter. Spence-Crawford is already past due. Look at the state of the lightweights, just going to social media while doing nothing. Usyk beat a well-regarded unbeaten champion in Krzysztof Glowacki in his backyard in Poland to win a world title in his 10th fight, beats a good unbeaten American challenger, and now respected heavyweight, Michael Hunter, in America. Enters the WBSS, not knowing who he'd have to fight, and is it went, he beat one of the best cruisers ever in Marco Huck in Germany, his backyard, then beats undefeated Mairis Briedis, adding his second title, in his backyard of Latvia (and look at what Briedis has gone on to achieve since...), then went to Russia to beat undefeated Murat Gassiev, who was on fire and held the other two belts. Usyk shut him out. Then he came to England knocked out Bellew, now he's gone to England again in front of 70,000 fans and put on a clinic against a very big, heavy hitting heavyweight champion, who's younger than him and had three titles. There's no drama with Usyk. He's proof if a fighter wants the fights, the fights happen. No controversial wins, no failed PED tests, no suspicions of PED's, no trash talk, just fights, wins, and looks incredible almost every time. I hope he gets the rematch in Ukraine, as he deserves to fight at home for once.
4. Wilder would be cannon fodder for Usyk, Fury would be a style issue. Usyk is definitely the better boxer than Fury, but Fury has height and reach and knows how to use it, isn't afraid to stink it out. He also doesn't gas, so it's a tall order for Usyk, but he's definitely live in that fight.
My new p4p: 1. Usyk 2. Inoue 3. Crawford 4. Lomachenko* 5. Canelo 6. Taylor 7. Fury 8. Lopez 9. Estrada 10. Spence
* Lomachenko above Lopez? Yeah, he's a better fighter and I'm convinced he'd win a rematch rather easily. He carried an injury which was quite clear and it was a case of Lopez also coupling that injury with a massive size advantage but he didn't really do anything. It was a case of both guys doing nothing, but him doing a bit better at doing nothing for the first half, but then Lomachenko bossing the action when they did fight a little. Canelo, as many know, I'm not as blown away as others. The obvious cheating, plus a lot of gift decisions and now he's just moved up to a really, really weak division as middleweight was hot? That was a shitty move IMO. Beterbiev is on the cusp but I wasn't thrilled with his last performance. Estrada, I love, but think lost to Chocolatito, and has a lot of tread in his tires, especially for the lower weights, but his resume is top notch.
He took his time with Bellew, didn’t take chances, but you could sense he knew he had his man. Great fighters like Salvador Sanchez, Alexis Arguello, Eder Jofre to make just a few we’re notorious for this. They’d take their time and explode when the timing was right.I'm going to say it but I think Usyk is being massively overrated by some. P4P no.1 and yet not even the best fighter in his, albeit new, weight class. Tony Bellew, in the last fight of his career, was probably beating Usyk until he got caught. Ok that's obviously the nature of boxing, but he's not a knockout artist and is being hyped on his boxing skills, so how can that be? I think people are just getting a bit ahead of themselves because they had AJ down as something he wasn't and AJ served up another poor showing.
I do like Usyk and was impressed with him coming up through Cruiser, but when I watched the Bellew fight I didn't think he would be able to live at HW, even though he got the win. As crazy as that sounds. But kudos on beating AJ. Can't be sniffed at with the danger he poses. But there's no way, for me, he beats Fury. Technically as good as Usyk but a true heavyweight and a very intelligent fighter too.
As I said earlier in the thread, I was surprised at his performance because I thought he was poor vs Chisora.He took his time with Bellew, didn’t take chances, but you could sense he knew he had his man. Great fighters like Salvador Sanchez, Alexis Arguello, Eder Jofre to make just a few we’re notorious for this. They’d take their time and explode when the timing was right.
He took his time with Bellew, didn’t take chances, but you could sense he knew he had his man. Great fighters like Salvador Sanchez, Alexis Arguello, Eder Jofre to make just a few we’re notorious for this. They’d take their time and explode when the timing was right.
Legend.It was to be expected and hinted at after the last fight by him, but Pacquiao has officially retired. One of my favourite boxers, he was absolutely relentless and so quick in his prime.
Manny Pacquiao retires from boxing to focus on political career - BBC Sport
Fury beat the unbeatable Vlad a man who dominated the division for 10 years. He also STOPPED the unbeatable dangerous Wilder. So effectively beat the guys who were beating everyone else. Their first losses ever or in a decade came through Fury. Wilder and Vlad at the time were bigger than any of AJ opponentsHe got knocked out. It could've been his dad as ref and it wouldn't have mattered. And his 'aura' was gone in one fight? Equally, and in WK's own words, he didn't prepare for the Fury fight like he did AJ. Game plan and physical fitness was different gravy.
So now you're acknowledging that Joshua had taken the harder fights. What's the problem then? Pre Uysk and it's still incredibly lopsided.
The unbeatable Wilder? When you say everyone else, you mean bums and journeyman. Have you even looked at Wilder's record? It's laughable. How many top 10 boxers had Wilder fought in his 40 fights? Sorry bud but it's not even a contest. The one top name on Fury's record Joshua also fought and beat. And when Joshua fought him he was in better shape and was better prepared. It wasn't just another young pretender, which is how he saw Fury.Fury beat the unbeatable Vlad a man who dominated the division for 10 years. He also STOPPED the unbeatable dangerous Wilder. So effectively beat the guys who were beating everyone else. Their first losses ever or in a decade came through Fury. Wilder and Vlad at the time were bigger than any of AJ opponents
The fury love in will end soon. I'm looking forward to that.
Wilder was smoke and mirrors. I think he had defeated two top 10 guys, one was a hopeless lump in Stiverne, the other a 40+ year old, Ortiz. Wilder is garbage.Fury beat the unbeatable Vlad a man who dominated the division for 10 years. He also STOPPED the unbeatable dangerous Wilder. So effectively beat the guys who were beating everyone else. Their first losses ever or in a decade came through Fury. Wilder and Vlad at the time were bigger than any of AJ opponents
depends on boxing federation. Stiverne, Ortiz,The unbeatable Wilder? When you say everyone else, you mean bums and journeyman. Have you even looked at Wilder's record? It's laughable. How many top 10 boxers had Wilder fought in his 40 fights? Sorry bud but it's not even a contest. The one top name on Fury's record Joshua also fought and beat. And when Joshua fought him he was in better shape and was better prepared. It wasn't just another young pretender, which is how he saw Fury.
No I watched both fights.depends on boxing federation. Stiverne, Ortiz,
Were you part of Vlad training camp?
I think he's getting sparked next fight v Wilder. Can only play Russian roulette so often.Fury is probably the best fighter in the heavyweight division.
Wilder or AJ wont lay a glove on him.
AJ is a big boy but his boxing skillset is very limited. Had he just worked behind a jab against Usyk he may have had a chance to beat him, but I dont know if youve ever noticed, AJ doesnt like being hit and as soon as he felt Usyk getting through his limited defence he had that look of not knowing how to handle him.
Fury beats Usyk for me.
It would be absolutely hilariousI think he's getting sparked next fight v Wilder. Can only play Russian roulette so often.
Agree with John Fury. AJ's team let him down... I was wondering at the time when Rob was asking him to stick to the jab, why were they trying to box a superior boxer, that's something I really didn't understand. AJ should have been grabbing him and using his size difference to bully him, make it uncomfortable and break up his rhythm.
I think he's getting sparked next fight v Wilder. Can only play Russian roulette so often.
Joshua only starting throwing punches with any degree of volume in the fifth round, where he threw 63. By that time, Usyk had already grown into the fight. He was ready for the onslaught and he had four rounds in the bag.
In the earlier rounds, Usyk matched Joshua for volume but was predictably more accurate, so he comfortably took each round while gaining in confidence and punch resistance.
Joshua's only way of winning is simply by swarming Usyk and throwing 60 punches from round one, like Chisora did. I think his problem is either a) he's scared of getting hit, or b) he thinks he's a better boxer than he is (and he is pretty good, just not close to Usyk's level).
Obviously now Usyk is going to know exactly which version of AJ is coming, so it's going to be doubly difficult for AJ to win second time around.
Agree with John Fury. AJ's team let him down... I was wondering at the time when Rob was asking him to stick to the jab, why were they trying to box a superior boxer, that's something I really didn't understand. AJ should have been grabbing him and using his size difference to bully him, make it uncomfortable and break up his rhythm.
He knows his onions and is absolutely spot on. AJ didn't fight to his strengths... madness.Fecking love big John Fury.
Yeah I’m watching, first thing I realised too was the hair transplant.Anyone watching the boxing on Sky?
Didn't know who the ginger pundit was so quick google search.
Turns out George Groves has doubled his weight and got a hair transplant since his retirement.