Just sent him to EAP as my first pick
Had him pinned down as a sub.Roberto Donadoni.
Just ignore the goalkeeper till the last pick and there's no disadvantage with the sub and there are more than enough great goalkeepers available.Odd number of pick means that those closer to the bottom will be at a disadvantage when it comes to subs.
I already picked a keeper.Just ignore the goalkeeper till the last pick and there's no disadvantage with the sub and there are more than enough great goalkeepers available.
Kohler Xavi and Shevchenko? Well it might not be as good as what I got but I don't think there's any room for complaining, top picks in each round imo
Not perfect, but I'm quite happy with it, given the players my DoF brought in for me.
Kohler is great, but while Xavi and Sheva are great players, they're not the ones I would have picked if given the choice. Don't forget Brolin either, who was actually quite good but most will only know as a fattie.Kohler Xavi and Shevchenko? Well it might not be as good as what I got but I don't think there's any room for complaining, top picks in each round imo
Had him pinned down as a sub.
Odd number of pick means that those closer to the bottom will be at a disadvantage when it comes to subs.
Not perfect, but I'm quite happy with it, given the players my DoF brought in for me.
I wanted him mainly for his versatility though he's terribly underrated on here.The cost of pfaffing with that picking.
You wouldn't have gotten Dasayev.
For a second I thought you're talking about Pfaff, which kinda confused me, like a lotI wanted him mainly for his versatility though he's terribly underrated on here.
For a second I thought you're talking about Pfaff, which kinda confused me, like a lot
Brilliant picture.
For a second I thought you're talking about Pfaff, which kinda confused me, like a lot
3. Annah
But he's unpicked and I honestly thought he's younger, didn't expect him to be eligible. Also MJJ won .There was no need to delete it. Let's all laugh at @MJJ with no stated reason anyway
He was top 2 or 3 in legacy rounds.Cocu was alright, far from the best
Who has been the top three most lucky, and the bottom three - most unlucky?
He was top 2 or 3 in legacy rounds.
So you are the third unluckiest manager because you got the second best instead of the best? feck off.Indeed but still far from someone like Enzo who was the best.
I suggested to use him as a left wingback, I actually think he would have been an awesome wingback.I didn't get Effenberg, I got Gerrard as a midfielder. The DoF pick you are missing there is Raúl.
Annah got some great breaks, unlucky to lose Tardelli but Cocu was one of the better legacy picks, not his fault he makes little sense in the team created thereafter.
Indeed but still far from someone like Enzo who was the best.
So you are the third unluckiest manager because you got the second best instead of the best? feck off.
I suggested to use him as a left wingback, I actually think he would have been an awesome wingback.
No, because I was the sole loser of the TBola round. Prior to that I was on the positive side of things. The rest who lost DOF players, lost defenders.
Tardelli was far from being the best player to go in T-bola, let alone the most crucial to a team. And it's not just me arguing your third place, I actually think once I lost Gerrard my only issue is the rigidity of Ljungberg/Raúl. Other managers have had to contend with worse things happening. e.g. crappy getting Mary Poppins, he was far and away the striker I didn't want, or Skizzo getting Solskjaer and Sánchez which pretty much nailed his frontline. Then MJJ/Theon had the relative misfortune of adding Rivaldo to Bochini and Dalglish, which looked a complete nightmare at the time until T-Bola helped out with that.
Losing Tardelli is nowhere near the biggest problem I can imagine, truckloads of competent midfielders knocking about at the time as well, even now.
Yup, Skizzo should probably have been the third in the unluck one.