VivaJanuzaj
Full Member
Yeah and I think Tresor and Montero will work superbly togetherAldo's latter half is crazy. Tresor, Camacho, Gerets, Montero. 4 great picks in a row and somehow he built a really great defense with pick 6-11.
Yeah and I think Tresor and Montero will work superbly togetherAldo's latter half is crazy. Tresor, Camacho, Gerets, Montero. 4 great picks in a row and somehow he built a really great defense with pick 6-11.
The point of having a randomizer would be lost if we have trades. The whole point is to manage with whatever you are dealt.I wanted to have a round of trades
You are never going to fix it. I personally play emphasis on picking the right sort of keeper for the tactics and defensive unit, don't really care what people make of it or the impact on voting, it's about the fuzzy feeling of having a side you are proud of, so this generic keeper nonsense is definitely not one I'd play along with. See a few drafts ago, I picked XXXXXXX because as a sweeper-keeper, then another time XXXXXX because my CBs weren't the tallest so I needed someone who stood out for imposing himself on aerial balls. I sure did argue their value, if people ignore it I'm not really fussed.
As for keepers, the managers/interested people first need to start giving them importance before moaning about scan voters not caring about them. How many in match discussions take the keepers into account? It usually stops at how strong a CB pair is instead of looking at the keeper as the part of the defense.
Charity begins at home.
Yeah and I think Tresor and Montero will work superbly together
Great pick Viva.
It's a game, after all - your moves should have an impact.
Well since non of you twats took my next pick I left it with Annah and he doesn't even know it
Reuter was my original plan. He should have been picked earlier, such a useful player in the right system with his pace.
I'm not sure what your system is, but if it involves Dani Alves you should have picked Reuter, and that's no slight on Alves.
Damn, I wish I could comment on the last few posts but anto would kill me.
I rate Reuter very highly but he has nothing on Alves going forward. Reuter is a very well balanced full back/wing back who is as good defensively and offensively, while not excelling to the absolute highest level at either. Alves is an offensively balanced one who excels at going forward and is absolute world class at doing that, so with an already secured defense that was more important than Reuters better defensive abilities.
Reuter was better than Alves at pretty much every attribute you can consider when comparing two wingbacks. The fact that he was less flashy and could also defend effectively doesn't make Dani Alves better and "more World Class" at attacking, just less balanced, as you admit. It's only natural that your attacking attributes stand out when you can't defend very well, else you wouldn't be a part of such a successful Barca side. Reuter would walk into most sides today or five years ago, if not all of them.
I don't agree with that at all but would be interesting to see what @Balu thinks. I've always loved very pacey players so Reuter has been one of my favorites for a long time. But I think it is really off to consider him better than Alves offensively. I think Alves is comfortably better, which is why he has racked up the statistics to prove it as well both for Sevilla and Barcelona.
I'm not saying he is better, just that Alves is NOT comfortably better and has nothing on Reuter bar being a bit more flashy and being blessed to have played with better players in a more attacking setup. Alves is certainly NOT better offensively to the extent that it is worth sacrificing the significant differential there is in defensive capability.
Mind you, you are discussing this with someone who grew up watching Uruguayan football live, South American football occasionally on TV, and German football every weekend. I'm a strange specimen as a result and grew very fond of tactical discipline and structure, people knowing what the heck they are supposed to be doing, being effective, etc. On balance I put it down as responsible for 70% of a winning side and creativity/flair/genius being responsible for the other 30%. Germans probably raise the 70%, South Americans argue the case of the 30%, and people following England will be happy with either because they are fed up of ineffectual systems that stifle whatever creativity is at hand.
I think that Alves is less flashy than Reuter, but that Reuter offensively is a lot less hit and miss than Alves who is very consistent at producing numbers(assists). Reuter was very flashy with his mesmerizing pace and good dribbling, which when it worked out looked amazing - but it wasn't something Reuter did in every attack.
Litti and Reuter wouldn't work too well in my eyes. Litti is also a pacey dribbler so with Reuter neither of them would have the crisp passing to find the others runs.
So am I the only one who was surprised to see Reuter picked ahead of Kaltz?
I don't understand this premise whereby if players dribble they can't pass the ball. Both could do both and the choice between doing one or the other is down to decision-making.
I take your point re: Becks/Neville vs. Ronaldo/Reuter, it's valid and complementing each other is hugely relevant. The problem is in your example Ronaldo/Alves doesn't necessarily work either. Ronaldo will always be the better one to have on the ball running at defenders.
No, he was the one over whom there was that whole discussion few pages ago where he was mad at me for hinting about Kaltz when I said him and Becks would have been an insane crossing duo for Chester. I presume he was badly hoping to get him (specially now with Vieri!) but couldn't have seen him reach back to him.Did he predict that too? I'm not surprised though, it's a pretty obvious pick
Probably, I haven't studied the teams of both the managers who picked him so that might be the case yeah.That's where I agree with Annah it depends on systems and what's needed from your fb.
No, he was the one over whom there was that whole discussion few pages ago where he was mad at me for hinting about Kaltz when I said him and Becks would have been an insane crossing duo for Chester. I presume he was badly hoping to get him (specially now with Vieri!) but couldn't have seen him reach back to him.
Thought crappy was after him as he has been looking at the 50s players from the start and was annoyed at missing out on Gerets.
I'm not fussed if one move has zero impact TBH, I just accept it and get on with it. There are far more important things to invest your time and effort in than changing voter behaviour regarding keepers in a football draft. I'm not being pedantic, just stating the obvious for the sake of perspective.
Reuter's passing wasn't great that is the issue.
Vieri would've been the perfect one to say "Manni banana, I head, goal", yep.