horsechoker
The Caf's Ezza.
Not a top clubWeren't City in for him?
Not a top clubWeren't City in for him?
Is that seriously your questionHow on earth is it a fact.
Weren't City in for him?
Well the story goes that Sir Alex didn't get to spend much time with Bellingham thanks to Murtough...We got Sir Alex, Bryan Robson, Eric Cantona and Ole give him a tour round carrington. If that doesn’t do it then nothing will, we didn’t feck it up Aaron Ramsey style.
Weren't City in for him?
That was the rumour. It always seemed like it was more a created rumour to help ronaldo get a deal and/or maybe make it look like there was competition for his signing to make United look good.
But if you look beyond that, I can’t see how Ronaldo would fit into a Pep team that is about the team , not the individual.
Ronaldo seems completely the opposite kind of character to the type Pep goes for, especially nearing the end of their career.
A fair portion of the fanbase was against the signing, and for obvious reasons, and we were proved right (although I did get caught up in the sentimentality of it).Of course it makes sense. I was buzzing when we signed Ronaldo. Guaranteed 20-25 goal a season striker + plus iconic club hero = happy days. However, had we had the right structure in place at the time, then someone above the manager would've vetoed the signing.
No I didn't watch it, I'm reacting to the tweet (also I'm a pro-Ole guy, and this isn't a subreddit).Did you even watch it? He says later in the video that if he did would not sign him if he could change something, because with hindsight it was the wrong decision both for Ole/United and Ronaldo. The hatred for Ole on this sub is fecking weird.
Really enjoyed watching it! A lot of interesting bits about the mentality of the players. For example how he thinks Maguire was highly affected by the incident in Greece, a lot more then I would've guessed at least.
He also mentions that he (obviously for people with a brain) was not involved in the financial decisions on what to pay for certain players, so everyone giving ETH shit for overpaying can sod off as well. That's "just" on our shit structure above the manager.
The bit about certain players sending coaches to tell Ole that they don't want to captain certain games is... something else.
Agree, see above.At the time it was the right decision but in hindsight it wasn’t the right decision.
Disagree, see above.It makes perfect sense! What is it that doesn’t make sense?
Yeah but... you're not PepThat was the rumour. It always seemed like it was more a created rumour to help ronaldo get a deal and/or maybe make it look like there was competition for his signing to make United look good.
But if you look beyond that, I can’t see how Ronaldo would fit into a Pep team that is about the team , not the individual.
Ronaldo seems completely the opposite kind of character to the type Pep goes for, especially nearing the end of their career.
If he'd have signed Rice instead of Ronaldo (which I said at the time) he'd probably still be here.
Well the story goes that Sir Alex didn't get to spend much time with Bellingham thanks to Murtough...
Some will say he was the best by virtue of him being Ole, which is fair enough. However, Jose was clearly more successful but happened to be a monumental prick. @RedSky recently had some stats up, and Jose's record here wasn't actually too bad. He would be remembered far more fondly if it weren't for his antics.
To say Ole was 'the best' is incorrect and subjective. He's probably my favourite as he's obviously a legend and he clearly had the clubs best interests at heart. Beyond that, he's an average manager who achieved more than I thought he could. Jose is clearly a better manager but I would take Ole ahead of him, due to Jose being a self-serving cnut. Jose was still the better manager, though.
Manager | Win % | Loss % | CS | Games | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Pts Per Game |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jose | 53.76% | 18.28% | 38 | 93 | 50 | 26 | 17 | 151 | 86 | +65 | 176 | 1.9 |
Ten Hag | 56.92% | 30.77% | 24 | 65 | 37 | 8 | 20 | 95 | 82 | +13 | 119 | 1.8 |
LVG | 51.32% | 23.68% | 29 | 76 | 39 | 19 | 18 | 111 | 72 | +39 | 136 | 1.8 |
Ole | 52.58% | 19.59% | 31 | 97 | 51 | 27 | 19 | 175 | 105 | +70 | 180 | 1.9 |
Ole said at half time in his last game vs Watford he asked in the dressing room who didn't want to play and then made changes.
Just went back and checked and Rashford and McTominay were subbed at HT in that game who don't exactly strike me as not wanting to play for Ole, particularly McTominay.
Would the Ronaldo signing have worked out if we brought in a better winger than Sancho?
Ronaldo was on the slide but his goal return was decent that season and in a better team he might've been just enough to do something serious.
Perhaps Ole had a plan for Sancho, I don't even think he was regular starter in the short time they worked together. Ole spoke about identifying the right kind of player for United but Sancho has proven to not be that so I wonder if he met him enough or he misjudged his character.
If you look at just Premier League Games then you get the following:
Manager Win % Loss % CS Games W D L GF GA GD Pts Pts Per Game Jose 53.76% 18.28% 38 93 50 26 17 151 86 +65 176 1.9 Ten Hag 56.92% 30.77% 24 65 37 8 20 95 82 +13 119 1.8 LVG 51.32% 23.68% 29 76 39 19 18 111 72 +39 136 1.8 Ole 52.58% 19.59% 31 97 51 27 19 175 105 +70 180 1.9
It's actually pretty close between Jose and Ole. The big difference is that we scored more often under Ole but also conceded more. It's also interesting to see how similar all four of our Managers have been with Points per Game.
Pep did apparently try to sign him though, which would contradict what you're saying.
If you look at just Premier League Games then you get the following:
Manager Win % Loss % CS Games W D L GF GA GD Pts Pts Per Game Jose 53.76% 18.28% 38 93 50 26 17 151 86 +65 176 1.9 Ten Hag 56.92% 30.77% 24 65 37 8 20 95 82 +13 119 1.8 LVG 51.32% 23.68% 29 76 39 19 18 111 72 +39 136 1.8 Ole 52.58% 19.59% 31 97 51 27 19 175 105 +70 180 1.9
It's actually pretty close between Jose and Ole. The big difference is that we scored more often under Ole but also conceded more. It's also interesting to see how similar all four of our Managers have been with Points per Game.
Yeah but... you're not Pep
How do we know this?
Are you not dubious of anything said publicly? Maybe it’s just me but I take most things said as possibly true or possibly said for a reason that’s nothing to do with clarity.
There’s nothing in Peps managerial career that suggests a character and player that old would be one he wants. I mean he got rid of Yaya, it’s not like Ronaldo is low maintenance.
Maybe I am but I was just f**king with United fans when I said I wanted Ronaldo, like when I said I wanted Sanchez. Mad how both them turned out, they don’t call me Pep “Trojan horse” Guardiola for no reason
The PPG is definitely interesting, and I'm surprised they're so close in all honesty (albeit over different sample sizes).
Ole could certainly get us scoring at times, and at least could provide some form of entertainment.
Looking at this, Ole is the best PL manager overall. There's practically no difference between the him and Mourinho, but I find scoring goals more important/impressive than defending well so Ole edges it for me. Mourinho (and Van Gaal) were also seriously helped by De Gea, who was past his best when Ole took over.
And Ten Hag is arguably the worst!
No, I'm not dubious of things both CR7 and Pep have said on public record. Its as close as one can get to what transpired. Unless you think both are lying of course.
Wild that we've scored fewer with Ten Hag than with Van GaalIf you look at just Premier League Games then you get the following:
Manager Win % Loss % CS Games W D L GF GA GD Pts Pts Per Game Jose 53.76% 18.28% 38 93 50 26 17 151 86 +65 176 1.9 Ten Hag 56.92% 30.77% 24 65 37 8 20 95 82 +13 119 1.8 LVG 51.32% 23.68% 29 76 39 19 18 111 72 +39 136 1.8 Ole 52.58% 19.59% 31 97 51 27 19 175 105 +70 180 1.9
It's actually pretty close between Jose and Ole. The big difference is that we scored more often under Ole but also conceded more. It's also interesting to see how similar all four of our Managers have been with Points per Game.
Wild that we've scored fewer with Ten Hag than with Van Gaal
He is clearly a very good manager, his record speaks for itself. Unfortunately didn't win a cup with United but he deserved it. His next club will be lucky to have him.
The thing with Ole is that we actually went on fairly long and decent runs of form in the League. The problem was we'd then go through a sticky period of form that would result in us dropping away from a potential title challenge. But we were at least entertaining. The sample size can't really be helped. The other stats that you were referring too shared the same sample size (The first 65 PL Games of each Manager), those stats showed Jose in a better light.
It’s more I look at motive and reason. I don’t see ronaldo being a pep player , just doesn’t fit the kind of player he signs in any measure, particularly on a downward trajectory.
We know why Ronaldo would say it, he doesn’t need an invitation to big himself up and we’ve seen how his ego plays out when he’s told he maybe not as important as he thinks.
Does Pep confirm all players city didn’t sign ? Maybe, I don’t know. In terms of suggesting city might have been in for him , well I don’t see any downside to him saying it. No blowback on him and if Ronaldo does really well he can say “we tried”.
I never take what’s said at face value if it doesn’t correlate with what looks more probable. I can’t understand why city would go for ronaldo for any reason other then trolling United (like Tevez). But they are so far ahead of us theyd be doing themselves a danger to taking on such a character as ronaldo.
I’d be shocked if it’s true cause it’s completely against how city has been run while Pep is there
Not sure I agree with that. EtH only needs to win 1 in 2 games up until he has the same number of games as Ole and Mou to record the same number of wins as them. That's a pretty impressive (in that select group) win ratio, and over the course of the season, that's what's going to give you the highest tally of points.Looking at this, Ole is the best PL manager overall. There's practically no difference between him and Mourinho, but I find scoring goals more important/impressive than defending well so Ole edges it for me. Mourinho (and Van Gaal) were also seriously helped by De Gea, who was past his best when Ole took over.
And Ten Hag is arguably the worst!
You mean that part where Ole goes on to say, he wanted a minutes guarantee?You quite clearly haven't got a clue what went on during his visit with us. You wouldn't have posted such tripe if you did.
Similar to above bar the cuppa, seeing as you addressed the post instead of going for the poster.We got Sir Alex, Bryan Robson, Eric Cantona and Ole give him a tour round carrington. If that doesn’t do it then nothing will, we didn’t feck it up Aaron Ramsey style.