Gimme 10 folks
Really like your team, @Snow, my favourite right now alongside Skizzo's.
One of my unobvious favorites remains unpicked And he is better than a lot of already picked players. He barely makes the ages criteria though, maybe some just assumed that he didn't.
I just thought about another one - definitely underrated here and not rightly so, could've been the great draft for him, even if I, personally, despise the guy. Well, tough luck, even though maybe someone will take him in the last round as a tactic changing sub.
We should have fan after the initial drafting and pick an unpicked XI.
Why? I don't see any weakness in T.Silva-Mertsesacker, not on the ground and not aerially, and Ivanovic's role will change between opponents. Ivanovic is an amazing attack RB, like you can see in nowadays' Chelsea, Ivanovic gets as high up the pitch as Alves does, it all depends on how the opposition's team is set upVJ I would consider playing ivanovic as a CB and getting a more attacking fullback.
Why? I don't see any weakness in T.Silva-Mertsesacker, not on the ground and not aerially, and Ivanovic's role will change between opponents. Ivanovic is an amazing attack RB, like you can see in nowadays' Chelsea, Ivanovic gets as high up the pitch as Alves does, it all depends on how the opposition's team is set up
I get your way of thought, but with Clichy given the freedom to bombard that other wing I prefer more balance and having a smart strict player like Ivanovic who can choose his times of attack and be the third man in defense instead of that DM(freeing Song when he's not roaming), than a RB like Dani Alves who would have made me need a water carrier. But I appreciate the criticism mateWith pedro and gotze both preferring to cut in, I think your team would have benefited more having a more attacking RB who will contribute more in offense than defense. Having a dedicated DM who can drop in to cover will make up for any fallacies on that side.
Not that ivanovic is a bad fullback, just that he is more defensive orientated.
I get your way of thought, but with Clichy given the freedom to bombard that other wing I prefer more balance and having a smart strict player like Ivanovic who can choose his times of attack and be the third man in defense instead of that DM(freeing Song when he's not roaming), than a RB like Dani Alves who would have made me need a water carrier. But I appreciate the criticism mate
I'd be concerned with Marcelo and Lichsteiner as the full-backs. Unless someone proves me wrong, which they probably will, I do not recall Terry or Cahill playing in a defence that had two full-backs who get forward to the extent that they do.
Yea. I've not found Terry or Cahill to be really good at dealing with 1v1. A skillful player who's faster than them will get past them. It doesn't happen often for them because they're so good within a defensive unit and are good markers and strong in the air.
No, you've got a very good point there. Prime Terry rather than current Terry mitigates the need for defensive full backs a bit, but even in his prime he generally played in very good defensive set ups. The other slight concern about his team was how Hargreaves could knit together with the intricate passing game Iniesta/Cazorla/Neymar/RVP would be capable of. Still a strong team though with a potentially mouth-watering attack.
That's a shame really, because Hargreaves isn't the type of midfielder you want "just to win the ball back and give it to a midfielder". Hargreaves is no Busquets of Cambiasso but he's more of a Carrick imo, he can get passes forward really well but he definitely shouldn't be deployed as a water carrier. That's a bad use of him.Lichsteiner is very good defensively though. Its just that Juve play five at the back and they need someone to run up and down the flank consistenly as a RWB due to which he plays in a very attacking role but he has done very well for them as well as before in Lazio in a four man set-up whenever they've employed it. Currently he has, slowed down a bit due to his age which has affected his defensive game as he isn't able to track back as well as he used to but since we are considering his prime, I don't think his defense would be an issue. Marcelo point, I agree but he has improved his defense since Jose took over at Madrid and isn't a liability he used to be defensively pre-2010.
Hargreaves isn't obviously a Busquets or Cambiasso but I think he was still a good passer for a player in his position. I don't need him to create for me. He just needs to win the ball back and give it to Ramsey/Iniesta/Cazorla to start and orchestrate the attacks.
That's a shame really, because Hargreaves isn't the type of midfielder you want "just to win the ball back and give it to a midfielder". Hargreaves is no Busquets of Cambiasso but he's more of a Carrick imo, he can get passes forward really well but he definitely shouldn't be deployed as a water carrier. That's a bad use of him.
I'm assuming my pick will come up before I get back.
@Joga Bonito has my last pick....anyone else gonna be around I can pass it on to? Just in case.
You can PM me. I will be online for the next couple of hours!
I'll be here too.
United players are so under-rated, it's a shame. There is a player who could match and beat any of the players playing against him who have already been picked, his nationality is no issue too.In his role, he is better than others with fancy names and reputations who withered in battles with him on the biggest stage
ok maybe i might over-stated the case for him, but I do consider that at his peak he was much more effective and courageous than his highly-rated (on the caf) partnerAre you sure he's post 80? If so, then I'm really clueless about who you are referring to.
ok maybe i might over-stated the case for him, but I do consider that his peak he was much effective and courageous than his highly-rated (on the caf) partner
Does @Edgar Allan Pillow has NM's pick?
He's certainly inclined to come inside, but he expertly played the very same inside-right role at Villarreal for many years. I see him complementing his full-back, the central midfield effort and Neymar's individuality on the other flank.Very good looking midfield and attack, although you'd surely want someone different than Cazorla to provide that RW width with Neymar at the other hand. Cazorla's tendency will always be going through the middle or even from the left.
Nope. After last pick fiasco, he refuses to even reply to my pm.
Think I need to look for a new job.
With Neymar on the other hand I'd personally would've preferred a more classic winger to provide width there. The full backs are out being asked for too much in this team, I'll save the big explanation for whoever he'll encounter in the matchday thread but if both full backs will be creating the width here(as Neymar & Cazorla won't), Terry-Cahill-Hargreaves will be the players left behind, and I'd have good money that these trio will suffer from a good counter attacking team.He's certainly inclined to come inside, but he expertly played the very same inside-right role at Villarreal for many years. I see him complementing his full-back, the central midfield effort and Neymar's individuality on the other flank.
Thoughts with you, bhai!
When are we having a strike in front of NM's house?
Thoughts with you, bhai!
When are we having a strike in front of NM's house?
I have to admit I'm really uncertain of how you'll shape up.People are either going to murder or love the way I am setting up. There will be no middle ground.
Something like this?I have to admit I'm really uncertain of how you'll shape up.
My guess? Something crazy like this:
Valdes
David Luiz ---- Bonucci ---- Otamendi
----------------------------------------------------- Alaba
Lahm Vidal
Turan Ozil Griezmann
Rooney
With a 3 men + Alaba defensive line, Alaba as the LWB given freedom, Lahm as the RDM with Vidal in midfield and the front 4 pretty much explains itself.
Could be brilliant actually, will require many arrows which is always a plus
ok maybe i might over-stated the case for him, but I do consider that at his peak he was much more effective and courageous than his highly-rated (on the caf) partner
Yeah probably but that's not crazy at all so where's the fun?I rate him pretty highly too but his peak was too short unfortunately.
On Stob's team, surely Lahm at RB and Luiz as DM.
You are indian? Always thought you were german!
Not too different than what I thought, same basic idea with different positions that makes it look more semantic. Could've been be very interesting team to watch in reality.