I think most of that happened even before or at the very beginning of the show. The main issue that's been raised throughout its airtime was the abhorrent writing. To be fair to them the inclusivity stuff & colour-blind casting was done seamlessly enough. Durin's wife has been alright even though a beard would've been a nice addition — and so has been Arondir (his love line has been a bit cringe but it's not on him).But it's also important to remember but that a lot of the bad reactions to it online come from the usual incel-core complaining about women and non-white people. Plus to a lesser extent there was obviously a section of Tolkien fans who had taken against it before it even came out who have been complaining since. Between the two of them you're getting the usual review bombing and internet bullshit that doesn't extent to the way most normal people react to TV shows. So I wouldn't be overly put off by all that noise.
I think most of that happened even before or at the very beginning of the show. The main issue that's been raised throughout its airtime was the abhorrent writing. To be fair to them the inclusivity stuff & colour-blind casting was done seamlessly enough. Durin's wife has been alright even though a beard would've been a nice addition — and so has been Arondir (his love line has been a bit cringe but it's not on him).
I don't dislike Bronwyn but her death would have added something to Theo for the future IMO
The writers are facing a losing battle no matter what they do, as they'll never be able to replicate Tolkien.A lot of people go on about the writing, but i'd love someone to actually explain what they mean by it. Alongside people whining about the dialogue. Is one line of dialogue enough for people to critise it when 99% of it is fine? I'm not directing this at you in particular, but I hear the example of "bad dialogue" over and over. But where actually is it? Where's this cringe dialogue.
The only part in this particular episode that gave me a double take was the hobbit section near the end. Mainly because the Dads speech seemed to contradict what we'd been told about the hobbit society in general for the past several episodes. But I can accept that maybe he's just trying to rally the troops when it feels hopeless. But the thing that really did take me out was when the mean lady said "I was wrong" only for a few moments later for Lennys character to go "you're never wrong wifey". But she just said she was wrong Lenny!! But that is the only example I can think of this episode and even then it's not cringe dialogue, just contradiction.
I'm actually interested to find out how many people in this thread watch youtube videos and which ones concerning Rings of Power. I watch Nerd of the Rings channel, just so he can jog my memory of some of the lore while also finding out what the stranger says.
I think she's the only character I actually don't like. She's only been put in to be a girl boss but her speech was so unimpressive I wanted to join the orcs. What the elf sees in her is beyond me.
The dialogue in general (not one line but 90%) is extremely bland and often unfitting the world. The blandness of it makes it tougher to think of examples for obvious reasons, so I'll give an example of a speech that simply doesn't fit in the Tolkien universe. Remember the angry Numenorian trying to rally the crowd against elves using the on-the-nose right-wing trope of "they take our jobs"? He's worried that the immortal elves have an unfair advantage as a fecking workforce.A lot of people go on about the writing, but i'd love someone to actually explain what they mean by it. Alongside people whining about the dialogue. Is one line of dialogue enough for people to critise it when 99% of it is fine? I'm not directing this at you in particular, but I hear the example of "bad dialogue" over and over. But where actually is it? Where's this cringe dialogue.
The only part in this particular episode that gave me a double take was the hobbit section near the end. Mainly because the Dads speech seemed to contradict what we'd been told about the hobbit society in general for the past several episodes. But I can accept that maybe he's just trying to rally the troops when it feels hopeless. But the thing that really did take me out was when the mean lady said "I was wrong" only for a few moments later for Lennys character to go "you're never wrong wifey". But she just said she was wrong Lenny!!
I'm actually interested to find out how many people in this thread watch youtube videos and which ones concerning Rings of Power. I watch Nerd of the Rings channel, just so he can jog my memory of some of the lore while also finding out what the stranger says.
The writers are facing a losing battle no matter what they do, as they'll never be able to replicate Tolkien.
I think she's the only character I actually don't like. She's only been put in to be a girl boss but her speech was so unimpressive I wanted to join the orcs. What the elf sees in her is beyond me.
This is exactly what I meant when I said it's explained instead of implicated.The dialogue in general (not one line but 90%) is extremely bland and often unfitting the world. The blandness of it makes it tougher to think of examples for obvious reasons, so I'll give an example of a speech that simply doesn't fit in the Tolkien universe. Remember the angry Numenorian trying to rally the crowd against elves using the on-the-nose right-wing trope of "they take our jobs"? He's worried that the immortal elves have an unfair advantage as a fecking workforce.
When it's bland, it's really bland. The best comparison would be not a TV-show but a computer RPG game where the lines of dialog are simply there to guide the character through the story. The story itself is laid out in a way that even a 5-year old can follow it where every bit of the important plot information is fully explained (instead of using things like visual narration and context clues), preferably twice.
I'm going to slightly contradict myself as this is technically a partly visual narration, but the whole foreshadowing of Khazad-dûm's eventual fall illustrates it well. First you have the mineshaft's collapse, then a decent speech by Durin-Sr. that hints on the potentially catastrophic consequences of mining deeper & deeper below the mountain for mithril... if you know what happened (and since it's been shown in the movies, most of the viewers know), that's more than enough to create proper suspense. How long did it last? Around 20 minutes before they went on with the leaf-flying scene to show the completely unsuspecting viewers what's actually hiding below the mountain.
Characters lack depth and realistic motivations. Galadriel is the poster child for this, being one of the fans beloved characters — one of the eldest and wisest elves on the continent she takes the personality of an average young adult fantasy movie's teenage protagonist. Elrond & Durin, a pair that is actually one of the positive highlights of the show, are set up in the worst way possible — we don't know anything about their apparent friendship aside from what they tell us themselves in a few sentences at the beginning. And apparently their bond is stronger than life and Durin even considers Elrond to be his brother from another mother. Do we get any background on their time together? No, he just tells Celebrimbor that Durin is a great friend of his actually.
But then the writing is not only about the words themselves, it's about the coherence of the story, the pacing, the stakes that show you that heroes have something to lose (and to gain). It's all been missing aside from a bright spark like Adar (a good antagonist with an interesting motivation who you can begin to actually root for) here and there.
I agree, I think some of the dialogue has been excellent. The Hobbit films are a low bar tbf.I dunno I'm pretty hardcore on my Tolkien and I think they are scoring above half marks. It's not as good as the LOTR film trilogy but it is better than the Hobbit trilogy. It certainly has the potential to turn into something good - though for now it remains just a tad above mediocre but very pretty.
If they had better dialogue and stopped assuming the viewers were stupid it would probably help a lot. I'd like to see more medieval social attitudes too and less heavily signalled girlboss fetishes.
Also what are the Mordor Orcs going to eat? Clearly Mordor in the book was huge - part of an organised ecocomy with agriculture to the south. TV Mordor is just a volcanic wasteland. Stuff like that just comes across as dumb. The Sauron reveal next week is also going to be dumb and contrived - it will make good TV but make no sense. Tolkien was all about world building and thre's no sense of that here. Characters don't follow the rules of the world.
"We Harfoots heart's are bigger den our feet! What we do better'n anyone else is stick together!"
(Unless you're injured, then we'll leave you behind to feckin' die )
Which was an especially choice bit of dialogue given they wanted to leave that fellow and his family behind because of a sprained ankle.
And the wholethingCelebornspent a thousand years chasing rumours of Sauron but not a min looking for her husband who is obviously not dead just so they can do the Halbrand Galadriel sexual tension stuff, with Halbrand either turning out to be Sauron or a Tom Riddle style vessel for him, oh the drama
And the wholethingCelebornspent a thousand years chasing rumours of Sauron but not a min looking for her husband who is obviously not dead just so they can do the Halbrand Galadriel sexual tension stuff, with Halbrand either turning out to be Sauron or a Tom Riddle style vessel for him, oh the drama
Made more stupid by the fact that if he were really dead then as an Elf he would be in the Halls of Mandos which is in Valinor so that would be known about.
I dunno I'm pretty hardcore on my Tolkien and I think they are scoring above half marks. It's not as good as the LOTR film trilogy but it is better than the Hobbit trilogy. It certainly has the potential to turn into something good - though for now it remains just a tad above mediocre but very pretty.
If they had better dialogue and stopped assuming the viewers were stupid it would probably help a lot. I'd like to see more medieval social attitudes too and less heavily signalled girlboss fetishes.
Also what are the Mordor Orcs going to eat? Clearly Mordor in the book was huge - part of an organised ecocomy with agriculture to the south. TV Mordor is just a volcanic wasteland. Stuff like that just comes across as dumb. The Sauron reveal next week is also going to be dumb and contrived - it will make good TV but make no sense. Tolkien was all about world building and thre's no sense of that here. Characters don't follow the rules of the world.
Do you know this is happening?
Oh and I love a good saying as much as the next guy, but if every other line is something along the lines of "what can not be known hollows the mind", it's starting to tick me off.
Other than thay, still enjoy it well enough.
No it's speculation I just assume it will. I'm discounting the possibility that the writers are better story tellers than I give them credit for.
I was almost literally shouting at my TV at that point. 'Your boss just listed all the people you guys dumped that he had written down in a book.'
Made more stupid by the fact that if he were really dead then as an Elf he would be in the Halls of Mandos which is in Valinor so that would be known about.
Since it's esentially fan fiction the writers are doing whatever they like. Finishing the season with a Sauron reveal would make sense. But since there is going to be 5 seasons in all i don't know. In this show they at least have the liberty to show Sauron as he was before the 3rd age and make up whatever they want. Personally I think the baddies are more interesting than the good guys in the show.
Either Celeborn is a prisoner somewhere or he'll be a Glorfindel type character who will be reborn and sent back to Middle Earth by the Valar. That would be my guess.
Do you think you would have enjoyed this more if you weren't a fan of tolkeins works?They've written themselves into a corner where the Sauron reveal is inevitable, even though it's completely obvious who he is. I'm curious to see where they plan to go with it though. After a lifetime of Sauron as an off stage baddy (save for one paragraph in the book) who Peter Jackson dragged onscreen, he's about to complete his century long journey to becoming a misunderstood heart throb.
Well the latter would at least make sense.
Do you think you would have enjoyed this more if you weren't a fan of tolkeins works?
I know you're trying to keep it as a separate medium but that must be tough if you had expectations (assuming you did before the first episode)
About Sauron being obvious. Sure, but only if you're a fan. The vast majority are aren't into Tolkien lore.
Yes but knowing how Sauron was a master manipulater, stayed in Numenor, was a shapeshifter and then based on that assuming he's Halbrand could only be deduced by a fan. The rest will be utterly confused.This is assuming he's right about him being Sauron. Which he may not be.
If he is Sauron then it doesn't explain how the trees have become diseased in Lindon.
This is assuming he's right about him being Sauron. Which he may not be.
If he is Sauron then it doesn't explain how the trees have become diseased in Lindon. Are they really diseased or is it just an illusion that Mithril dispels.
According to who? The man himself?Tolkien twice used trope of Dwarves being driven from their homelands due to their own greed and selfishness (which is a mishmash of being driven forth from Israel as punishment for Jesus, and medieval anti-semitism about money-lending, keeping in mind Tolkien's dwarves were based on Jews, not Glaswegians.)
Wait, who is obviously Sauron?
Well, maybe Rings of power will get better as the series progresses. Some shows need a season or two to figure what works and what doesn't and they get better. But no guarantees on that of course.That’s shite to hear. Yeah I couldn’t sit through waiting weekly for a world I love so much. It would kill me. the house of the dragon is keeping me at bay while waiting for the show to finalise. I am looking forward and dreading it at the same time.
No, that’s probably one of the odds-on favorite outcomes along with Halbrand, The Stranger, Eminem, Adar, Gil-galad, Daemon, and Isildur’s sister.Genuine question - has it actually been confirmed anywhere that Sauron has even appeared in the show yet? Or are we all just assuming that he's an existing character?
House of dragon is bloody brilliant. Yeah I was unsure the first episode but it's really done very well so far. Hopefully they'll have a better idea where they are going on the 2nd season. Even the best shows needed that 2nd season to take off right.Well, maybe Rings of power will get better as the series progresses. Some shows need a season or two to figure what works and what doesn't and they get better. But no guarantees on that of course.
I've heard good things about house of the dragon and it is backed by GRR Martin himself, but haven't watched it. Still hesitant since GoT ended so badly. Is it worth a shot? Thinking to try it after the season has ended.
Spot on. I call it lazy story telling. It's like the writers stopped caring and just took the brain dead easy way out.The lack of action isn't the problem. It's the awful writing, the cringe inducing dialogue & the fact that the characters in the show are so idiotic & unlikable they make you want to root for Sauron.
It's also got GOT S8 disease of time & distance no longer having relevance as characters zip thousands of miles to and fro because the script demands it and writing is difficult.
I've always said. If the story was good, nobody would be complaining about being true to the lore. The problem is that the story is shite. So people wind up complaining about everything. They sacrificed the lore for this shite?I think most of that happened even before or at the very beginning of the show. The main issue that's been raised throughout its airtime was the abhorrent writing. To be fair to them the inclusivity stuff & colour-blind casting was done seamlessly enough. Durin's wife has been alright even though a beard would've been a nice addition — and so has been Arondir (his love line has been a bit cringe but it's not on him).
Rocks look down. Boats look up.Oh and I love a good saying as much as the next guy, but if every other line is something along the lines of "what can not be known hollows the mind", it's starting to tick me off.
Other than thay, still enjoy it well enough.
There's so much that's crappy.A lot of people go on about the writing, but i'd love someone to actually explain what they mean by it. Alongside people whining about the dialogue. Is one line of dialogue enough for people to critise it when 99% of it is fine? I'm not directing this at you in particular, but I hear the example of "bad dialogue" over and over. But where actually is it? Where's this cringe dialogue.
The only part in this particular episode that gave me a double take was the hobbit section near the end. Mainly because the Dads speech seemed to contradict what we'd been told about the hobbit society in general for the past several episodes. But I can accept that maybe he's just trying to rally the troops when it feels hopeless. But the thing that really did take me out was when the mean lady said "I was wrong" only for a few moments later for Lennys character to go "you're never wrong wifey". But she just said she was wrong Lenny!! But that is the only example I can think of this episode and even then it's not cringe dialogue, just contradiction.
I'm actually interested to find out how many people in this thread watch youtube videos and which ones concerning Rings of Power. I watch Nerd of the Rings channel, just so he can jog my memory of some of the lore while also finding out what the stranger says.
Gotta agree. The Elrond Durin bromance is the best part about the show so far.The dialogue in general (not one line but 90%) is extremely bland and often unfitting the world. The blandness of it makes it tougher to think of examples for obvious reasons, so I'll give an example of a speech that simply doesn't fit in the Tolkien universe. Remember the angry Numenorian trying to rally the crowd against elves using the on-the-nose right-wing trope of "they take our jobs"? He's worried that the immortal elves have an unfair advantage as a fecking workforce.
When it's bland, it's really bland. The best comparison would be not a TV-show but a computer RPG game where the lines of dialog are simply there to guide the character through the story. The story itself is laid out in a way that even a 5-year old can follow it where every bit of the important plot information is fully explained (instead of using things like visual narration and context clues), preferably twice.
I'm going to slightly contradict myself as this is technically a partly visual narration, but the whole foreshadowing of Khazad-dûm's eventual fall illustrates it well. First you have the mineshaft's collapse, then a decent speech by Durin-Sr. that hints on the potentially catastrophic consequences of mining deeper & deeper below the mountain for mithril... if you know what happened (and since it's been shown in the movies, most of the viewers know), that's more than enough to create proper suspense. How long did it last? Around 20 minutes before they went on with the leaf-flying scene to show the completely unsuspecting viewers what's actually hiding below the mountain.
Characters lack depth and realistic motivations. Galadriel is the poster child for this, being one of the fans beloved characters — one of the eldest and wisest elves on the continent she takes the personality of an average young adult fantasy movie's teenage protagonist. Elrond & Durin, a pair that is actually one of the positive highlights of the show, are set up in the worst way possible — we don't know anything about their apparent friendship aside from what they tell us themselves in a few sentences at the beginning. And apparently their bond is stronger than life and Durin even considers Elrond to be his brother from another mother. Do we get any background on their time together? No, he just tells Celebrimbor that Durin is a great friend of his actually.
But then the writing is not only about the words themselves, it's about the coherence of the story, the pacing, the stakes that show you that heroes have something to lose (and to gain). It's all been missing aside from a bright spark like Adar (a good antagonist with an interesting motivation who you can begin to actually root for) here and there.
Contrived. The word you're looking for is contrived. The writers demand certain plot lines. They couldn't be bothered to actually write a coherent story to meet those plot lines. So they just force everything to bend to whatever they want. Whether it makes sense is irrelevant.Which was an especially choice bit of dialogue given they wanted to leave that fellow and his family behind because of a sprained ankle.
And the wholethingCelebornspent a thousand years chasing rumours of Sauron but not a min looking for her husband who is obviously not dead just so they can do the Halbrand Galadriel sexual tension stuff, with Halbrand either turning out to be Sauron or a Tom Riddle style vessel for him, oh the drama
Yeah, they already declared they will not follow the lore and they will compress the timeline. I don't blame them for this. I do, however, blame them for sacrificing the lore for shite writing.Yes, they pick and choose the stuff they want to use, repurpose stuff from better works and the chronology of the show is totally fecked.
None of this would matter if the show was more than a pretty distraction, though in all this I still think the Elrond and Durin stuff is really quite good.