Books The BOOK thread

I just read a book called I am Pilgrim by Terry Hayes.



It was a bit of a tome over 900 pages I think, but the writing in it is sensational, the back story for the character The Saracen is some of the best I've ever read and then the main character is an excellently flawed protagonist with a very good back story himself.



Proper 10 out 10 book it's been around for a while now but I'd only picked it up recently, would make an excellent series
 
I.N.L.A. Deadly Divisions

The story of the history of the leftist terrorist group that emerged from the split with the Official IRA in 1974.

The book is a triumph of investigative journalism. The authors reveal information that comes straight from the horse's mouth and, as a result, we're able to understand the machinations of the organisation that most of us only really heard about when they committed violent acts.

The book is well-written, engaging, and also offers the authors' own criticism of the decisions and actions taken by the INLA and its political wing, the IRSP. In many ways, the IRSP were ahead of the curve, in terms of their political ideas and actions (for example, they led the charge when it came to the rights of republicans to identify as political prisoners, which led to the 1981 Hunger Strikes, whereas the Provos were very reluctant to get involved), but they never seemed to reap the benefits. A lack of money, support on the ground, and constant infighting, ultimately led to acrimonious splits and bloody feuds.

The book details the many internecine battles between rival factions, beginning with the formation of the IRSP/INLA after the Official IRA's ceasefire, through the fallout after Dominic 'Mad Dog' McGlinchey's one-man dictatorship, and the feud between the INLA and IPLO. On each occasion, former friends and comrades hunted each other down, leaving the communities they came from gripped with fear.

What I found most interesting, were the 'coms', smuggled out of prison, between Gerard 'Dr Death' Steenson and Harry Flynn (a man Steenson had tried to kill 4 years earlier). Steenson's reputation in West Belfast - and in popular mythology - is that of a cold-blooded assassin. He shot dead Billy McKillen, the leader of the Official IRA in Belfast, during a feud with the INLA, when he was just 16 years old. However, the coms paint a picture of a very intelligent, very shrewd political thinker, many of whom's predictions were to come true. Ultimately, though, like so many leading characters in the book, he dies at the hands of his former allies.

It's a really excellent book. It's the only one that deals with the INLA in its entirety and, in some ways, it's written almost like a thriller. At almost 500 pages, the fact that I read it in less than a week is testament to how good it is. Highly recommended.

("The Lost Revolution" is an equally good book detailing the history of the Official IRA).
 
I've been in a reading slump this year. The last book I read was in 2024. Could do with some recommendations, preferably a nice and easy read to get me back into the flow of things.
 
I've been in a reading slump this year. The last book I read was in 2024. Could do with some recommendations, preferably a nice and easy read to get me back into the flow of things.
Project Hail Mary, by the guy who wrote The Martian, it's a fun read. Can probably get it second hand for a few quid.
 
Started McCarthy’s The Road last night. About 80 pages in and it’s gripping as feck. Something about this author’s prose just draws you in deeper and deeper.
 
Started McCarthy’s The Road last night. About 80 pages in and it’s gripping as feck. Something about this author’s prose just draws you in deeper and deeper.
Ah man to experience the Road again for the first time.

For anyone who might be interested, a graphic novel adaptation of the Road was released last year. It's a very different experience obviously, but beautifully illustrated.
 
I've been in a mega slump this year when it comes to reading, but newborn babies will do that I guess. I stupidly started The Obscene Bird of Night by Jose Donoso a few weeks before the due date, and it can be weeks between chapters. Not ideal because it's confusing as feck (but excellent all the same).
 
The Committee: Political Assassination in Northern Ireland

This book was banned in the UK (don't know if it still is), and concerns the findings of an independent television production company who investigated claims of collusion in Northern Ireland. They uncovered a conspiracy, involving loyalist terrorists, politicians, security forces and businessmen, which directed a campaign of violence towards members of the Catholic/Nationalist/Republican community.

The Committee in question, the Ulster Loyalist Central Co-ordinating Committee, was chaired by Billy Abernethy, who was a chief executive in the Ulster Bank, as well as being a former RUC reservist. He was joined by notorious loyalist killers, Robin 'The Jackal' Jackson and Billy Wright (aka King Rat), the former head of RUC Special Branch, Trevor Forbes, Reverend Hugh Ross (head of the Ulster Independence Movement), and Nelson McCausland (DUP politician), among others.

They are alleged to have met at regular intervals to discuss the direction of loyalist terror. An insider stated that the Committee's main aim was the killing of republicans, but they also sanctioned the murder of innocent Catholics when it was convenient. The targets were selected at these meetings, with the actual logistics of assassinations being left to the likes of Jackson and Wright to hammer out with the RUC's 'Inner Force' - disaffected members of the police service who ensured safe passage and a clean getaway for the gunmen.

It all reads like fantasy for most people who aren't from Northern Ireland and didn't experience the Troubles. That the police colluded with sectarian killers and 'respectable' members of society, to plot the deaths of innocent people, is just too outlandish to even contemplate. After all, the majority of the evidence of this Committee hails from one man - Jim Sands. A self-confessed member of the Committee, he later recanted his story and claimed that the programme makers encouraged and led him into the allegations he made. However, when you know for a fact that collusion between loyalist killers and security forces definitely happened in other cases, it doesn't seem so far-fetched. I'll leave it to you to make up your own mind.

Here is an online copy of the book

Below is the original Dispatches programme.

 
Started McCarthy’s The Road last night. About 80 pages in and it’s gripping as feck. Something about this author’s prose just draws you in deeper and deeper.
Are you considering watching the film adaptation afterwards? It's very good.
 
I just read a book called I am Pilgrim by Terry Hayes.



It was a bit of a tome over 900 pages I think, but the writing in it is sensational, the back story for the character The Saracen is some of the best I've ever read and then the main character is an excellently flawed protagonist with a very good back story himself.



Proper 10 out 10 book it's been around for a while now but I'd only picked it up recently, would make an excellent series

Absolutely amazing, possibly the most captivating book I've ever read. Could not put it down.

It's such a contrast to his second book.
 
Heaven and Hell: A History of the Afterlife - Bart D. Ehrman

The renowned New Testament scholar looks at the origins of the idea of Heaven and Hell, from the ancient Greek philosophers and the Jewish authors of the Old Testament, to the teachings of Jesus himself and, finally, the Christian theologians who followed.

It's a fascinating book, really easy to read and understand, with Ehrman carefully teasing out subtexts and hidden meanings from the literal words.

He discusses the ancient Greek belief in the soul, which is connected to the body while the person is alive, and which lives on after death. Writers like Homer believed it was a 'finer' (my word) version of the body, almost ghost-like, but enabling the dead person to still experience all of their senses. After death, the soul resided in Hades, which was kind of bleak and boring, but wasn't suffering eternal torment.

Later Greek thinkers, such as Plato, grappled with the notion of divine judgement, with justice being meted out depending whether a person had been good or bad during their life. For him, the soul was eternal. But others, such as Epicurus, despite subscribing to the notion of the soul, thought that it dissolved upon death, and that there was no continuity of consciousness when a person died.

The Jews of the Old Testament era, initially having an Epicurean kind of stance on the afterlife ('Sheol' is often cited as the Hebrew version of the Underworld, but it is also used frequently as the word for a grave or a pit; either way, it was not a place of eternal damnation), are greatly influenced by Greek culture later on (after all, Alexander the Great conquered the known world).

In fact, by the time of Jesus, there isn't a Jewish consensus on the afterlife or the soul: the Pharisees believed in the resurrection of the dead and some form of afterlife with rewards and punishments; the Sadducees generally rejected the idea of resurrection and the immortality of the soul, focusing on the here and now; and the Essenes, according to the historian Josephus, held a more Greek view, believing in the immortality of the soul which would be liberated from the body at death.

Jesus himself preached that his kingdom was earthly and was imminent (he told his disciples that he would return before some of them had died). He didn't talk about disembodied souls rising up to Heaven; rather, believers would rise from the dead and join him in Paradise on Earth. Non-believers and the wicked would be obliterated (ie: cease to exist).

The gospel writers, 2-3 generations after Jesus's death, and dealing with the fact that he hadn't actually returned, were faced with a dilemma, and moved the goalposts somewhat. To a greater or lesser extent, they still ascribed to an Earthly Kingdom which Jesus would rule over, but their different takes on Jesus's life and teachings paved the way for early church leaders and thinkers to put words in Jesus's mouth that he didn't say.

These people develop ideas of the afterlife that contradicted those of Jesus, and it's their teachings, not his, which carried over to the present day. It was they who posited the notion of Heaven being a place of eternal bliss and Hell as a place of everlasting torment.

I could go on. For example, Ehrman talks about early Christian martyrs willingly dying in the most horrific ways in order to mimic the suffering Jesus went through on the cross. And he expounds upon early Christian thinkers' concepts of Heaven and Hell as having different 'levels' or 'areas' where different things were happening to souls depending on how they lived on Earth, which influenced the likes of Dante more than a thousand years later. All the while, he makes it accessible and entertaining (if that's the right word?)

Anyway, in summary, it really is a great book and I highly recommend it.
 
History of the People of England vol 3 (1689-1834) - Alice Greenwood

I bought this trilogy last year from Ebay, but the seller had somehow lost or sold the other two volumes, so kindly gave me this one for free. English history is a big gap in my knowledge, as I've always been more interested in events in Europe (French Revolution is my specialty), so I thought it was time to right that wrong.

This book is absolutely fantastic. It reminded me so much of school, as this is the kind of text we read, and it really is of its time. Published in 1926, there's some wonderfully anachronistic ideas and turns of phrase. For example, the Irish are described as having: "... the peculiar faculty for maintaining two opposed and mutually destructive arguments at once." Furthermore, the apprenticeship system is lauded because: "it really taught the children to earn their living."

The book covers the change from monarchy to parliamentary democracy, and the transformation from an agrarian to an early industrial society, all against the backdrop of the various conflicts and alliances that England was involved in. I learned how port became the drink of the upper classes (England was allied to Portugal at the time, with huge tariffs being put on Spanish and French goods), that Liverpool comprised just 24 streets in 1700, and that England had its own prohibition 200 years before America.

I could go on. Books like this are the reason I fell in love with history in the first place. I finished it and I want to know more. 10/10
 
Absolutely amazing, possibly the most captivating book I've ever read. Could not put it down.

It's such a contrast to his second book.
The 2nd book was such a let down after I Am Pilgrim.

It was like halfway through he decided to throw in a new idea he'd been thinking of but didn't have enough to it to write a full book about it.