Gambit
Desperately wants to be a Muppet
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2004
- Messages
- 31,064
Love it. Best show this year for me.
Agreed, although I don’t think the character development is actually that great. Outside of Carmy, and Richie (to a lesser extent. - his face-turn was way too quick and facile), I don’t think the characters are that compelling (Marcus is ok, I guess).Yeah, that bothered me too. Anyone with the most basic grasp of cooking won’t feck up a dish to the grasping at throat/spitting it out stage, never mind a professional chef. At worst they’ll be thinking they got the balance of spicing/seasoning wrong or the flavour combinations don’t work. Literally gagging on a dish they’ve just cooked is so weird and over the top. And then it happens multiple times…
That’s been a general theme of the show to me. Someone said earlier how real it seems. I think the opposite. They actually lay everything on so thick it’s almost a bit much. A lot of the comedy is bordering on slapstick and a lot of the emotional stuff is in your face, dialled up to 11. It still works though. Because the characters are great so you don’t mind suspending disbelief when it all gets a bit hammy (no pun intended)
Agreed, although I don’t think the character development is actually that great. Outside of Carmy, and Richie (to a lesser extent. - his face-turn was way too quick and facile), I don’t think the characters are that compelling (Marcus is ok, I guess).
Yeah finish it and then we can debrief!I like Sydney a lot too. Although I shouldn’t discuss this much further as I’m still only 3 episodes into season 2!
Aich, she's not likeable at all!I like Sydney a lot too. Although I shouldn’t discuss this much further as I’m still only 3 episodes into season 2!
Just finished season 2.
I really enjoyed the end of the last episode, starting from when Donna showed up and there was that piano music building up in the background. Gave a weird, ominous feeling. Then with REM playing at the end. Don't know why but the score of that last episode gave it a weird vibe. I felt for sure that Marcus was going to get shot or something when he went to sack the new starter that was taking Meth outside, but it didn't show anything else there.
Out of interest, what exactly is supposed to be up with Donna?
On a side note, it's sad seeing JLC looking so aged. She seems to look 10 years older every time i see her in something new.
I think we're ok talking about the show with no spoilers guys, it's been out for a while! Agree on @Lastwolf's take on the scene with Donna and Pete, it's so beautifully poignant.
Also don't quite get why some people don't like Sydney, she's a great character.
It's great. As ever, some nitpicking dullards here who should post a lot less.
What constitutes a nitpicking dullard? Someone who doesn't share your opinion on The Bear?It's great. As ever, some nitpicking dullards here who should post a lot less.
What constitutes a nitpicking dullard? Someone who doesn't share your opinion on The Bear?
Quote and shame, mangy denture.It's great. As ever, some nitpicking dullards here who should post a lot less.
You didn’t answer the question.Ooooh you got me.
Decided to watch, think it’s excellentGutted, it's not about Stephen Bear. Won't watch.
Stuck on episode 6 of the second season. So freaking annoying. Had to stop watching after 20 minutes.
Would I miss too much if I just skip the whole episode?
That episode is a masterpiece. It's meant to be uncomfortable to watch.Stuck on episode 6 of the second season. So freaking annoying. Had to stop watching after 20 minutes.
Would I miss too much if I just skip the whole episode?
What do you mean you’re stuck?
That episode is a masterpiece. It's meant to be uncomfortable to watch.
That episode is a masterpiece. It's meant to be uncomfortable to watch.
I think you have to consider Episode 6 as a bit of an "unreliable narrative" in that it is portrayed as Natalie and Carmy's "memory" of the occasion rather than a straight narrative of what definitely happened. This means that some of the interactions are exaggerated as any memory of such a horrendous event would be over time. Hence Jamie Lee Curtis's acting is one of absolute extremes of emotion / Borderline Personality disorder.I was a bit in between with that episode, felt like it was great acting but slightly annoying still. Why are people calling it a masterpiece?
It does give a bit of background which culminates in a scene near the end that felt quite powerful, which I mentioned in one of my previous posts.
I think you have to consider Episode 6 as a bit of an "unreliable narrative" in that it is portrayed as Natalie and Carmy's "memory" of the occasion rather than a straight narrative of what definitely happened. This means that some of the interactions are exaggerated as any memory of such a horrendous event would be over time. Hence Jamie Lee Curtis's acting is one of absolute extremes of emotion / Borderline Personality disorder.
Why do I think this? The scene at the dinner table has distorted ultra-close-ups of Uncle Lee and Michael's faces as their conflict escalates and as the final act happens, Michael becomes a distant voice and the camera focuses on Natalie and Carmy's faces, seemingly frozen in the moment of a horrible memory.
I could be totally wrong and is meant to be factual, but to me everyone's behaviour in the episode, including the Fak brothers wearing identical clothing and being very tweedledum / tweedledee is a little hyper-real.
I think it's an amazing episode and my wife and I now have a new "Scale" of how awkward a family/work event has been...."It went ok actually - only about a four fish level of awkwardness" or "My god that was awful....we got to six fishes and I had to leave before it went the full 7 fishes""
Yeah this makes a lot of sense.I think you have to consider Episode 6 as a bit of an "unreliable narrative" in that it is portrayed as Natalie and Carmy's "memory" of the occasion rather than a straight narrative of what definitely happened. This means that some of the interactions are exaggerated as any memory of such a horrendous event would be over time. Hence Jamie Lee Curtis's acting is one of absolute extremes of emotion / Borderline Personality disorder.
Why do I think this? The scene at the dinner table has distorted ultra-close-ups of Uncle Lee and Michael's faces as their conflict escalates and as the final act happens, Michael becomes a distant voice and the camera focuses on Natalie and Carmy's faces, seemingly frozen in the moment of a horrible memory.
I could be totally wrong and is meant to be factual, but to me everyone's behaviour in the episode, including the Fak brothers wearing identical clothing and being very tweedledum / tweedledee is a little hyper-real.
I think it's an amazing episode and my wife and I now have a new "Scale" of how awkward a family/work event has been...."It went ok actually - only about a four fish level of awkwardness" or "My god that was awful....we got to six fishes and I had to leave before it went the full 7 fishes""
Yeah this makes a lot of sense.
You mean John Mulaney? He was playing Michelle’s boyfriend Stevie.I just finished Season 2 episode 7 but have a question about episode 6 (Christmas flashback)
Episode 6 the Christmas one was mental. I loved it but it was a very tense and chaotic episode. Everybody killed it in the role. But who was that person sitting beside Uncle Lee and cousin Michelle (I think her name was) at the table?
But episode 7 my favourite episode of the show yet. I never thought I'd get invested in this show but I was actually happy for Richie as he was crushing the restaurant service game. I was glad they did the Tiff getting engaged thing early to show he just got stronger. Also not gonna lie, not a Taylor Swift fan but that whole scene of the pizza serving, him acing the taste test and singing in the car somehow worked with the song playing in the background was my favourite scene by far
You mean John Mulaney? He was playing Michelle’s boyfriend Stevie.
My man!Martyrs or À l'intérieur