Skizzo
Full Member
@Pat_Mustard and @Physiocrat stop being so damn cordial, otherwise Edgar will think we've gone soft.
@Pat_Mustard and @Physiocrat stop being so damn cordial, otherwise Edgar will think we've gone soft.
Usually Sharemytactics.Had a big weekend, just doing my writeup now so may be a bit late. What formation/lineup website should we use?
Aye, it's almost a shame that no subs are allowed here as it prevents being able to test out a wider range of players.Since the quality of picks is pretty uniform it does give you genuine choice of set-up unlike a normal draft where the 12th pick just evens up the snake draft pick order
He was 33 years and was still the best in the world. He did things that the rest of us could only imagine. I do not even dare to think what would be 10 years before, when he was in the best physical form and technique. Honestly, throughout my life I have faced many opponents and seen many players, but for me Hector Scarone remains the best of all - Giuseppe Meazza
Soccer in Sun and Shadow said:Forty years before the Brazilians Pelé and Coutinho, the Uruguayans Scarone and Cea rolled over the rivals’ defense with passes from the thigh and zigzags that sent the ball back and forth from one to the other all the way to the goal, yours and mine, close and right to the foot, question and answer, call and response. The ball rebounded without a moment’s pause, as if off a wall. That’s what they called the River Plate style of attack back in those days: “The Wall.”
Héctor Scarone served up passes like offerings and scored goals with a marksmanship he sharpened during practice sessions by knocking over bottles at thirty meters. And though he was rather short, when it came to jumping he was up long before the rest. Scarone knew how to float in the air, violating the law of gravity. He would leap for the ball, break free of his adversaries, and spin around to face the goal. Then, still aloft, he would head it in.
They called him “The Magician” because he pulled goals out of a hat, and they also called him “The Gardel of Soccer” because while he played he sang like no one else.
Aye, it's almost a shame that no subs are allowed here as it prevents being able to test out a wider range of players.
Maybe allow subs but don't change the OP? In this case if you are to see the actual sub - you have to follow the discussion, so it kinda replicates a match clock.Yes, I thought about the same thing earlier on.
The problem with subs remains the same, though: They're not considered as actual subs (but do-overs) by the neutrals/voters.
We need to implement some kind of match clock format which the voters actually acknowledge first – if that can be done, subs will make sense.
In this draft the 12-14 players do make a difference, even if they aren't used, because they make the selections less predictable – so even if they aren't properly showcased in the match thread, they have their part to play.
Those who lose the ball and remain with folded arms should not play. - Antonio Sastre
Sastre and Leonidas were the Di Stefano and Puskas of Sao Paulo football club
Argentines want to copy us Brazilians, but they forget that an Argentine came to Brazil twenty years ago to teach us football. His name was Antonio Sastre
Angels with Dirty faces said:River scored 105 goals in thirty-two games the following season, 1938, but it was not enough. Independiente, with Erico again supreme, racked up 115 and sealed the title on the final day of the season with an 8-2 victory over Lanus. Erico may have gotten the goals, but the real star of that side was Antonio Sastre, a player hailed by Cesar Luis Menotti as the greatest he ever saw and in 1980 voted one of the five greatest Argentine players of all time, capable of playing in a range of positions. That was part of what made him so dangerous: with the opposition concerned with Erico and his fellow striker - Vicente De La Mata, Sastre would drift deep, breaking the traditional structures of the game to pick up the ball deep and create the play.
Born in Lomas de Zamora in 1911, Sastre, like so many others, came to prominence at Progresista in Avellaneda barrio of the La Mosca. He made his debut in 1931, replacing the injured **** at inside-left, seemingly at the instigation of ****, whose place he would eventually take. Tall and powerful, Sastre may have ended up playing a an orthodox center-forward, but he moved to the left after Independiente signed the great Uruguayan striker ****, his versatility proving a key asset. In total, he played 340 games for Independiente, scoring 112 goals and winning the championship in 1938 and 1939, before moving to Sao Paulo in 1941. He helped them to three Paulista championships and had a statue erected in his honor. "If there was ever a Nobel Prize for Soccer," the club president Decio Pacheco Pedroso said, "there's no doubt the whole of Brazil would vote for Sastre."
Aye fair enough. It works both ways too. Often you might want to bring on a sub to make a defensive change to shut the door when winning the voting, but then you might get a voter who rocks up and thinks that's the way it's played out for the whole game.Yes, I thought about the same thing earlier on.
The problem with subs remains the same, though: They're not considered as actual subs (but do-overs) by the neutrals/voters.
We need to implement some kind of match clock format which the voters actually acknowledge first – if that can be done, subs will make sense.
In this draft the 12-14 players do make a difference, even if they aren't used, because they make the selections less predictable – so even if they aren't properly showcased in the match thread, they have their part to play.
Maybe allow subs but don't change the OP? In this case if you are to see the actual sub - you have to follow the discussion, so it kinda replicates a match clock.
Yeah, Wednesday is perfect. I read that post too @Chesterlestreet. Sounds fair.
Well, I'm skeptical.
If you do it like that, the scan voters won't know that a sub has taken place at all - which is arguably problematic in itself if we're aiming for realism.
And those who follow the discussion won't necessarily treat the subs as subs - in fact, what usually happens in match threads would indicate that they will not treat them as such:
"I like this much better - so, yeah, I'll vote for that."
That's the standard response - and it doesn't factor in a "match clock" at all in most cases. Whether you make the sub after 2 hours or 20 hours makes no difference as long as you manage to catch the voters in time, as it were.
People have to alter their voting habits - and start reasoning like this:
"Yeah, I like that much better - but the fact is that you only have 12 minutes left on the clock, and you won't catch up - so I have to vote for the other guy."
The latter isn't done - and you can't force people to think like that either. It has to be a natural thing.
But by all means, if the majority of the managers want subs - who am I to argue? I think it's a bit late, though - everyone had the chance to question the rules when they were posted.
I think the sensible solution here would be to leave it as it is unless an actual majority voice their opinion in this thread - and do so fairly quickly. If not, it's better left as a debate to be had before the next draft.
No, there's a post by @Chesterlestreet explaining the terms and conditions on that. I pick just before the match and my opponent gets a chance to veto my pick. It's actually quite fair.Have you picked your last player?
No, there's a post by @Chesterlestreet explaining the terms and conditions on that. I pick just before the match and my opponent gets a chance to veto my pick. It's actually quite fair.
Stupid question: why 'just before the match'? Magical surprise effect?
Will pick by tonight, or tomorrow morning.@Mciahel Goodman I suggest you pick as soon as possible, to finalize your roster in good time before the match (scheduled for Wednesday).
Will pick by tonight, or tomorrow morning.
Thanks, will do.Excellent - just tag Mounchester and get his official go-ahead.
Meanwhile, everyone can go ahead and post unpicked XIs and whatnot - the "no unnamed players" rule is no longer in effect.
Antonio Arias Mujica (born October 9, 1944) is a former Chilean football defender, who played for the Chile national team between 1968 and 1973, gaining 30 caps. He was part of the Chilean squad for the 1974 World Cup. At club level, Arias played for Magallanes and Unión Española.
Not just him, though. I found several more interesting players that I was interested in picking but couldn't because I discovered them too late. I was particularly interested in Albrecht after seeing him perform for Argentina in the 1966 World Cup.I was hoping Dirceu might get picked. Looked an interesting player from what I've seen.
Soccer In Sun and Shadow said:“In general Uruguayan football is a far cry from what it used to be. Ever fewer children play it and ever fewer men play it gracefully. Nevertheless, there is no Uruguayan who does not consider himself a PhD in tactics and strategy, and a scholar of football history.
Uruguayans’ passion for soccer comes from those days long ago, and its deep roots are still alive. Every time the national team plays, no matter against whom, the country holds its breath. Politicians, singers, and carnival barkers shut their mouths, lovers suspend their caresses, and flies refuse to budge. ”
While doing research on Scarone I came across this excerpt -
Reminded me of antohan
While doing research on Scarone I came across this excerpt -
Reminded me of antohan
@Chesterlestreet or any other neutral
We are ready to get our match started against @Aldo. Let us know when we need to submit our write-up and formation pic.
Both matches are up.
Final pick is Gary Medel @MounchesterUtd
Not sure if it has been asked elsewhere, but do we need to play all the Pool 2 players?
Also, what site do you make the formations at?