So..you still think miracles don't happen ?Well, yeah. The whole thing started when I said he's a win away from London though. If he gets it Sock is out, as is practically everyone else. If he doesn't win the next one, he'll finish behind Busta anyway, regardless of what Sock does.
It's the smart thing to do. I'm surprised he didn't retire in the previous match. He was really struggling with his movement big time.Nadal must have more withdrawals than actual losses.....no wonder his win ratio is epic. Solid tactic.
Just looked it up and talk about trying too hard!The NextGen Draw Party will go down as one of the most cringy events in tennis history. Not an auspicious start to the whole thing.
This will be available on Amazon right?Just looked it up and talk about trying too hard!
Group A looks interesting I think. Won't watch much of it, but hope to watch at least one match to see how the rules for the tournament are implemented.
I actually have no idea who's got the tv rights to it.This will be available on Amazon right?
I actually have no idea who's got the tv rights to it.
I'm off ill from work today, I guess I will see how the next gen tournament starts shortly.
How have you found it? I've been drifting in and out of it. Not sure I like the best of five, first to four games.Same here
Or a young Federer perhaps?The mens game is in disarray at the moment. It needs a young Nadal, Djokovic or Murray desperately. Aged 19/20/21 they would have been gobbling up circus events like the one in Paris this week. It really makes you appreciate (if you didn't already) how brilliant they were for the game.
Group A/Pete Sampras - Rafael Nadal, Dominic Thiem, Grigor Dimitrov, David Goffin
Group B/Boris Becker - Roger Federer, Alexander Zverev, Marin Cilic, Jack Sock
Still not convinced Nadal will play and if he does make it through the tournament.
Fairly random I believe. Think they just get two legends who are available to participate.Am not familiar with the tournament, but what are Sampras and Becker about? /edit: ah, those are actually group names...any particular reason why those two?
I have to say I'm enjoying these new test rules. I hope they implement them in the tour. Maybe without the shorter sets. The deciding point(no adv) system will help end games and sets quicker
The shotclock is the only change I like (and I'm a biased Federer fan, so take that with a grain of salt.)And why would we want that? There are few things more exciting and dramatic than a 6+ deuce game, each point adding more pressure and tension. These are often the highlights of matches and to me, the Milan tournament felt a bit flat party because of that rule. It sucks so much thrill out of it.
It looks like that rule is designed to streamline tennis for ADHD sufferers and pump more players per day into court and tv schedules. feck that.
I have changed my mind a bit about the headset coaching stuff, not all that shitty.
The shotclock is a must!
The shotclock is the only change I like (and I'm a biased Federer fan, so take that with a grain of salt.)
Wanting to finally win it I guess.Why did Nadal even play this tournament?
He struggles here when fully fit never mind when he’s half fit.
And again in the TB with a double fault. 7th I think...Credit to Nadal there saving three match points. But Goffin is trying his best to choke it.