wr8_utd
Ripped :'(
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 39,172
How any bloody BP does he need to break?! He put a second serve out on BP and that sitter he missed in the previous game as well.
How any bloody BP does he need to break?! He put a second serve out on BP and that sitter he missed in the previous game as well.
So basically unless Rafa breaks before, this set will go to a tie breaker that Rafa wins comfortably.
Looks like it.I don't really get Rafa's game plan here. Is he just hoping Anderson double faults him a break?
So happy for both of them.It's early enough still but all signs point to this being the third quite dull men's grand slam final in a row. Still amazing that the two greatest of all time look on course to win them all.
Why do so many here dislike Nadal? Is it because he won so many times vs Fed?
Why do so many here dislike Nadal? Is it because he won so many times vs Fed?
Why do so many here dislike Nadal? Is it because he won so many times vs Fed?
Anderson just needs to regroup and pretend the 1st set didn't happen.
Well ie your posts are very much anti-Nadal, just felt there's a bit of dislike there.Who dislikes him ? He's clearly the 2nd best player of all time and deserves the respect commensurate with that title.
He would have to risk but I doubt he has something up his sleeve which can surprise Rafa.Anderson just needs to regroup and pretend the 1st set didn't happen.
Well ie your posts are very much anti-Nadal, just felt there's a bit of dislike there.
He would have to risk but I doubt he has something up his sleeve which can surprise Rafa.
I wouldn't say comfortably, it's definitely debateable.Really ? I've never been anti-Nadal. He's a great player. I, like a vast majority of others, just consider Federer to comfortably be the GOAT.
I wouldn't say comfortably, it's definitely debateable.
Tbd then?And its been debated numerous times in different threads in places like here - https://www.redcafe.net/threads/greatest-mens-tennis-player-of-all-time.347887/
Tbd then?
But 23-14!I could be if Federer retires and Nadal wins 3 more slams. Otherwise its much pretty set in stone.
But 23-14!
The only GOAT metric in tennis is how many slams a player wins. The rest is always forgotten.
I'm not sure even just catching 19 would change the debate (and I say this as someone who prefers Nadal but really likes both and sees them as the 2 best ever). If he becomes the first player in the open era to win each slam twice or was to somehow do something at Wimbledon again (say, he won at least 2 of another 3 slams away from Roland Garros) then the debate becomes more interesting.Nadal winning three more French opens is doable Imo.
Nadal winning three more French opens is doable Imo.