coolredwine
lameredboots
Except he didn’t.This wasn't the case though? Macron ordered the cartoons to be projected onto government buildings, was there a need to do this? There are plenty of other ways to make the point.
Except he didn’t.This wasn't the case though? Macron ordered the cartoons to be projected onto government buildings, was there a need to do this? There are plenty of other ways to make the point.
I have to agree with 2mufc on this. This has got nothing to do with the cartoons anymore. It's got all to do with Macron now.
That said humiliation and insults against the Prophet is nothing new. History tells us that he was humiliated and insulted many times during his time. He didn't do anything about it and neither did his followers. Understandable that Muslims would get extremely angry but violence should not be the way forward. I don't think even Erdogan is calling for violence. He is calling for boycott of French products and he has the right to call for it too.
Some people are mixing up the cartoons issue and the French Governments support for the cartoons to be displayed. Two different issues.
This wasn't the case though? Macron ordered the cartoons to be projected onto government buildings, was there a need to do this? There are plenty of other ways to make the point.
As I just posted, it’s extremists that have effectively manipulated people into reacting this way. Sure the vast majority of Muslims will be offended but it would generally end there. The problem is if extremists are able to get into the psyche of even one person through propaganda you can end up with these types of reactions.The idea that some Muslims should get mad enough to murder because of some cartoons or French support for the cartoons is frankly .
Half of the things can be banned to maintain public order because almost everyone is offended by one thing or the other.The point i was trying to make is that the french govt can legally ban the cartoons to maintain "public order". The next point i am making is the cartoons can be legally seen as racism and also defamatory and insulting to the "honor of a particular group". The final point i am making is that french law allows "opinions" on religions and therefore people should be free to critique religions.
Having said all of that i see the situation worsening in france and europe, erdogen will milk it politically for his political benefit and so will the far right politicians in europe. Even the islamic terrorists are conservative right wingers living in there eco chamber. I won't be surprised if there's another ethnic cleansing in europe a few decades from now, the left is doomed.
Err what? Macron ordered that only after a crazy had lost his head and went into the building to kill the cartoonists. Not before.
Which means a tiny fringe satirical magazine provoked the ire of religious conservatives in the first place. So the point stands.
Misinformation. Two townhalls in the south projected the cartoon and none of them have anything to do with Macron.Also about Macron demanding cartoons be projected, is this truly what he did or is this an exaggeration?
How does Erdogan even enter in this argument? Murders happened in France anyway.
I have to agree with 2mufc on this. This has got nothing to do with the cartoons anymore. It's got all to do with Macron now.
That said humiliation and insults against the Prophet is nothing new. History tells us that he was humiliated and insulted many times during his time. He didn't do anything about it and neither did his followers. Understandable that Muslims would get extremely angry but violence should not be the way forward. I don't think even Erdogan is calling for violence. He is calling for boycott of French products and he has the right to call for it too.
Some people are mixing up the cartoons issue and the French Governments support for the cartoons to be displayed. Two different issues.
Yeah sane Muslims will be rolling their eyes alright. It’s the crazies you have to fix.As I just posted, it’s extremists that have effectively manipulated people into reacting this way. Sure the vast majority of Muslims will be offended but it would generally end there. The problem is if extremists are able to get into the psyche of even one person through propaganda you can end up with these types of reactions.
The real issue is the question of how you fix it. Be weak on extremists and they won’t change their views and you disillusion your population and that leads to more aggression and hatred towards Muslims overall. Be strong and you alienate Muslims and that feeds into the extremism cycle.
I think you’re missing the point. Regardless of whether the act which caused Macron to do this is valid in justifying the action he took, that’s not the only point to consider is it? You have to look at the wider impact and consequence and what it means. It’s not that difficult to appreciate.
Misinformation. Two townhalls in the south projected the cartoon and none of them have anything to do with Macron.
Because he is trying to project himself as the guardian of Muslim dignity globally. Just as Khomeini did in 1989.
I have to agree with 2mufc on this. This has got nothing to do with the cartoons anymore. It's got all to do with Macron now.
That said humiliation and insults against the Prophet is nothing new. History tells us that he was humiliated and insulted many times during his time. He didn't do anything about it and neither did his followers. Understandable that Muslims would get extremely angry but violence should not be the way forward. I don't think even Erdogan is calling for violence. He is calling for boycott of French products and he has the right to call for it too.
Some people are mixing up the cartoons issue and the French Governments support for the cartoons to be displayed. Two different issues.
The fact that some Muslims seem more concerned by them being made to look bad than the fact their members of their faith are being radicalised to the extent where they carry out these attacks says a lot to me.
The fact that some Muslims seem more concerned by them being made to look bad than the fact their members of their faith are being radicalised to the extent where they carry out these attacks says a lot to me.
What should macron do? Ban the cartoons of Muhammad in France? Will that prevent the killings?
Totally. Cartoons. Beheadings.This is ultimately about a very small minority of Muslims and the ruling elite in France wanting to win this so-called argument of freedom of speech and censorship with the combination of murder, toughness, insensitivity, intolerance, and triumphalism. Basically, both sides are just out to prove my dick is bigger than yours. Sadly, this doesn't end well for anybody.
Totally. Cartoons. Beheadings.
Six of one, half a dozen of the other.
There’s good on both sides.Totally. Cartoons. Beheadings.
Six of one, half a dozen of the other.
Sadly, I’m afraid you might by right.France is fecked. Can only hope that countries around Europe that can still prevent this, do so. Including my own.
Surely tolerance and sympathy is not a bad thing. But who should he be tolerant to? Not the murderer surely? He can and should preach for tolerance all around. Is he not doing that?Allegedly he should be more tolerant and sympathetic as intolerants are murdering innocents. Go figure.
So you are saying that Muslims have no right to be angry? That's ridiculous. Yes they have no right to violence but now Muslims must not get angry because they are showing cartoons of The Prophet?
Macron is right that violence has no place not only in France but in any country because of the cartoons. He is right the extremism should stop.
But he has poured fuel into the fire by supporting the cartoons to be displayed publicly.
Yes. If you are angry over cartoons you are in the wrong. Blasphemy is fine in France. If that's something you have an issue with you are the problem but can't admit it.So you are saying that Muslims have no right to be angry? That's ridiculous. Yes they have no right to violence but now Muslims must not get angry because they are showing cartoons of The Prophet?
Macron is right that violence has no place not only in France but in any country because of the cartoons. He is right the extremism should stop.
But he has poured fuel into the fire by supporting the cartoons to be displayed publicly.
Surely tolerance and sympathy is not a bad thing. But who should he be tolerant to? Not the murderer surely? He can and should preach for tolerance all around. Is he not doing that?
He is being tolerant, he's jut not perceived as being tolerant by those who choose to interpret it as an attack on their religion.
When this is happening in France....
(source: BBC)
...he's entirely right in pointing out that it's a particular a religion that has a problem with indoctrination, intolerance and freedom of speech which it needs to solve.
Stating the obvious to everyone fact that we have a problem in our hands, is not an attack or discrimination. Charlie Hebdo cartoons made fun of all religions. But only one community got riled up and angry which resulted in violence from some of their followers.
So you are saying that Muslims have no right to be angry? That's ridiculous. Yes they have no right to violence but now Muslims must not get angry because they are showing cartoons of The Prophet?
Macron is right that violence has no place not only in France but in any country because of the cartoons. He is right the extremism should stop.
But he has poured fuel into the fire by supporting the cartoons to be displayed publicly.
So you are saying that Muslims have no right to be angry? That's ridiculous. Yes they have no right to violence but now Muslims must not get angry because they are showing cartoons of The Prophet?
Macron is right that violence has no place not only in France but in any country because of the cartoons. He is right the extremism should stop.
But he has poured fuel into the fire by supporting the cartoons to be displayed publicly.
So you are saying that Muslims have no right to be angry? That's ridiculous. Yes they have no right to violence but now Muslims must not get angry because they are showing cartoons of The Prophet?
Macron is right that violence has no place not only in France but in any country because of the cartoons. He is right the extremism should stop.
But he has poured fuel into the fire by supporting the cartoons to be displayed publicly.
The difference is that islamophobia doesn't exist. There's never been a case of someone getting terribly frightened with no reason when seeing a mosque or someone looking like a muslim. People who get scared of islam because they're about to get their head cut off or fear muslims will attack their freedom of speech have no irrational fear, but a very real and justified one, so that's not a phobia either.@Abizzz @utdalltheway
Now you're conflating criticism (reasonable) with Islamophobia (unreasonable) which are different.
Yes, absolutely. There is no right not to be offended. It's everybody's freedom of religion to not abide someone else's religious rules and ridicule anyone they want, that's exactly the same freedom of religion that allows muslims to be in France and practice their religion in the first place. Not showing the cartoons is kneeling for the totalitarian rule of islam, the claim that their religious rules apply to everybody.This wasn't the case though? Macron ordered the cartoons to be projected onto government buildings, was there a need to do this?