Scholes has just retired, Anderson is likely to be sold. Fellaini would a.) replace them, and b.) be an improvement on playing Giggs or Jones in CM. And I say this as someone who isn't totally against Giggs and Jones in CM on occasion.
Just thought I'd make a sensible reply as you've been getting a lot of shit. But, yeah, you're not really making a whole lot of sense. We can buy both a solid central midfield AND a match-winning winger/forward.
Scholes and Ando didn't play much anyway this season. So the argument would be Fellaini should be brought in strengthen the squad. I'm all for strengthening the squad, but do you really do that with a 24m player? Maybe, but I doubt it.
I assume we don't have unlimited funds, wihch may or may not be a warranted assumption. My hunch is that our warchest for summer transfers is somewhere in the 60-80m range. Even that could be wildly optimistic. Unless rumors that Ronaldo is interested in coming back to OT -- and as of just a few hours ago the media speculation has it down to United and PSG -- are definitively refuted by Moyes or Ronaldo himself, we'd be absolutely fukking crazy to spend 24m on Marouanne Fellani and not that money to better use bringing in Ronaldo.
And if we have the warchest to bring in both Fellaini AND Ronaldo, then who am I to argue against Moyes brining in both?
We actually could use a bit of depth to supplement our midfielders (I assume Ando will be gone soon), although I don't know why we wouldn't give Cleverley a clearer shot at staking his claim and even giving Powell more minutes. But as we saw this season when he was fit, Kagawa was a dominating presence in the last third of the pitch, easily finding the right man with the perfectly weighted ball or easily scoring when the chances presented themselves.
What Fellaini would give us is a massive target on crosses. That would be a nice tool to have in the toolbox. He's a bit clumsy in the middle third, but he does get stuck in defensively and you have to love that. However, the legitimate criticism of our central midfielders this season was the lack of playmaking ability. Fellaini just isn't a playmaking central mid. But on the oddball occasion where we're down late in the game and we need to hoof long balls into the box, I really can't think of a better man with proven experience in the prem for the job than Fellaini.
A good argument for Fellaini is that we need cover for Carrick, who's been relatively injury-free for a very long time now. Fellaini is no Carrick, but he's a tough guy with very sharp elbows (he'll be a favorite referee target if he joins United and continues to throw elbows at opponents) who's got the ability to pillage up and down the pitch. I've only seen snippets of Strootman so I can't judge who's the better player in this regard but everything I've read in other forums and media scouting reports suggest Strootman has vastly more potential than Fellaini. If we're looking for cover or an eventual replacement for Carrick, perhaps we should took a harder look at him.